Tolerability of Repeated Application of Transcranial Electrical Stimulation with Limited Outputs to Healthy Subjects.
Tolerability of Repeated Application of Transcranial Electrical Stimulation with Limited Outputs to Healthy Subjects.
复制标题
重复应用经颅电刺激的耐受性,对健康受试者的输出有限。
DOI:
10.1016/j.brs.2016.05.008
复制
发表时间:
2016-09
影响因子:
7.7
通讯作者:
Bikson M
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Paneri B;Adair D;Thomas C;Khadka N;Patel V;Tyler WJ;Parra L;Bikson M
The safety and tolerability of limited output transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) in clinical populations support a non-significant risk designation. The tolerability of long-term use in a healthy population had remained untested. We tested the tolerability and compliance of two tES waveforms, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and modulated high frequency transcranial pulsed current stimulation (MHF-tPCS) compared to sham-tDCS, applied to healthy subjects for three to five days (17–20 minutes per day) per week for up to six weeks in a communal setting. MHF-tPCS consisted of asymmetric high-frequency pulses (7–11 kHz) having a peak amplitude of 10–20 mA peak, adjusted by subject, resulting in an average current of 5–7 mA. A total of 100 treatment blind healthy subjects were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups: tDCS (n = 33), MHF-tPCS (n = 30), or sham-tDCS (n = 37). In order to test the role of waveform, electrode type and montage were fixed across tES and sham-tDCS arms: high-capacity self-adhering electrodes on the right lateral forehead and back of the neck. We conducted 1905 sessions (636 sham-tDCS, 623 tDCS, and 646 MHF-tPCS sessions) on study volunteers over a period of six weeks. Common adverse events were primarily restricted to influences upon the skin and included skin tingling, itching, and mild burning sensations. The incidence of these events in the active tES treatment arms (MHF-tPCS, tDCS) was equivalent or significantly lower than their incidence in the sham-tDCS treatment arm. Other adverse events had a rarity (<5% incidence) that could not be significantly distinguished across the treatment groups. Some subjects were withdrawn from the study due to atypical headache (sham-tDCS n = 2, tDCS n = 2, and MHF-tPCS n = 3), atypical discomfort (sham-tDCS n = 0, tDCS n = 1, and MHF-tPCS n = 1), or atypical skin irritation (sham-tDCS n = 2, tDCS n = 8, and MHF-tPCS n = 1). The rate of compliance, elected sessions completed, for the MHF-tPCS group was significantly greater than the sham-tDCS group’s compliance (p = 0.007). There were no serious adverse events in any treatment condition. We conclude that repeated application of limited output tES across extended periods, limited to the hardware, electrodes, and protocols tested here, is well tolerated in healthy subjects, as previously observed in clinical populations.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
7.7
作者:
Brunoni, Andre Russowsky;Nitsche, Michael A.;Bolognini, Nadia;Bikson, Marom;Wagner, Tim;Merabet, Lotfi;Edwards, Dylan J.;Valero-Cabre, Antoni;Rotenberg, Alexander;Pascual-Leone, Alvaro;Ferrucci, Roberta;Priori, Alberto;Boggio, Paulo Sergio;Fregni, Felipe
通讯作者:
Fregni, Felipe
影响因子:
2.5
作者:
Fricke, K.;Seeber, A. A.;Rothwell, J. C.
通讯作者:
Rothwell, J. C.
影响因子:
2.5
作者:
Gladwin, Thomas E.;den Uyl, Tess E.;Wiers, Reinout W.
通讯作者:
Wiers, Reinout W.
影响因子:
3
作者:
Guleyupoglu, Berkan;Schestatsky, Pedro;Edwards, Dylan;Fregni, Felipe;Bikson, Marom
通讯作者:
Bikson, Marom
影响因子:
5.3
作者:
Harty, Siobhan;Robertson, Ian H.;O'Connell, Redmond G.
通讯作者:
O'Connell, Redmond G.