How Peers Make a Difference: The Role of Peer Groups and Peer Relationships in Personality Development
How Peers Make a Difference: The Role of Peer Groups and Peer Relationships in Personality Development
复制标题
同伴如何发挥作用：同伴群体和同伴关系在人格发展中的作用
DOI：
10.1002/per.1965
复制
发表时间：
2014
影响因子：
5.9
通讯作者：
Specht
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Zimmermann;Hutteman;Specht
同伴是人们生活中普遍存在的一个方面，但他们在人格发展中的作用却很少被考虑。这是令人惊讶的，因为同龄人是解释整个生命过程中人格发展的有希望的候选人。由于同伴的定义并不明确，本文首先阐述了同伴的定义标准及其在不同生命阶段的作用。然后，我们讨论了同龄人在整个生命周期的个性发展中的作用。我们主张，社会群体观点和社会关系观点的整合是必不可少的理解同伴对人格发展的影响。群体社会化理论特别适合于解释群体规范导致的群体之间的发展差异。然而，它忽视了同龄群体内部的发展差异。相比之下，PERSOC框架特别适合于解释群体内发展的个体差异，这是特定的二元同伴关系经历的结果。我们认为，同伴群体效应和二元同伴关系效应的共同考虑可以促进人格发展的一般理解。我们讨论了两个框架的交叉施肥的例子，为未来的研究提出了途径。版权所有© 2014欧洲人格心理学协会
Peers are a pervasive aspect of people's lives, but their role in personality development has rarely been considered. This is surprising, given that peers are promising candidates to explain personality development over the entire lifespan. Owing to the lack of clear–cut definitions of peers, we first elaborate on their defining criteria and functions in different life phases. We then discuss the role of peers in personality development across the lifespan. We advocate that an integration of social group perspectives and social relationship perspectives is essential to understand peer effects on personality development. Group socialization theory is particularly suited to explain developmental differences between groups as a result of group norms. However, it is blind towards differences in development within peer groups. In contrast, the PERSOC framework is particularly suited to explain individual differences in development within groups as a result of specific dyadic peer–relationship experiences. We propose that a conjunct consideration of peer–group effects and dyadic peer–relationship effects can advance the general understanding of personality development. We discuss examples for a cross–fertilization of the two frameworks that suggest avenues for future research. Copyright © 2014 European Association of Personality Psychology
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
W. Swann
通讯作者：
W. Swann
影响因子：
5.9
作者：
Hutteman, Roos;Hennecke, Marie;Specht, Jule
通讯作者：
Specht, Jule
第三时代的社会关系：使用护航模型评估优势和挑战
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2006
期刊：
Annual review of gerontology and geriatrics Vol.26
影响因子：
--
作者：
Antonucci;T.C.;Akiyama;H.;Birditt;K.S.
通讯作者：
K.S.
影响因子：
22.4
作者：
Wrzus, Cornelia;Haenel, Martha;Neyer, Franz J.
通讯作者：
Neyer, Franz J.
影响因子：
158.5
作者：
Christakis, Nicholas A.;Fowler, James H.
通讯作者：
Fowler, James H.