Achieving international biodiversity targets: Learning from local norms, values and actions regarding migratory waterfowl management in Kazakhstan.
Achieving international biodiversity targets: Learning from local norms, values and actions regarding migratory waterfowl management in Kazakhstan.
复制标题
实现国际生物多样性目标：学习哈萨克斯坦关于迁徙水禽管理的当地规范、价值观和行动。
DOI：
10.1111/1365-2664.14198
复制
发表时间：
2022-07
影响因子：
5.7
通讯作者：
Bunnefeld, Nils
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Jones, Isabel L.;Timoshenko, Alexey;Zuban, Ivan;Zhadan, Konstantin;Cusack, Jeremy J.;Duthie, A. Bradley;Hodgson, Isla D.;Minderman, Jeroen;Pozo, Rocio A.;Whytock, Robin C.;Bunnefeld, Nils
关键词：
迁徙物种受到国际立法的保护;因此，它们跨越国际边界的季节性迁移可能为理解全球保护政策如何在不同的社会生态背景下转化为地方一级的行动提供了机会。此外，地方一级对迁徙物种的管理可以揭示文化和治理如何影响实现全球目标的进展。在这里，我们调查潜在的错位之间的双向关系的全球层面的保护政策（即狩猎禁令和配额）和地方层面的规范，价值观和行动（即法律的和非法狩猎）在北方哈萨克斯坦的水禽狩猎作为一个案例研究。北方哈萨克斯坦是全球重要的水禽和北极繁殖物种的关键中转区。狩猎是根据联合国-西非国家经济共同体政府间协议通过许可证、配额和季节性禁令进行管理的。为了更好地了解当地水禽狩猎的社会生态背景，我们采用混合方法，使用社会生态调查，非正式讨论和重点迁徙鹅物种的人口建模：（a）调查狩猎动机与社会经济因素的关系;（B）评估物种保护状况的知识;（c）预测小白色额鹅的人口规模（LWfG; Anser erythropus; IUCN Vulnerable）在不同的生存率和狩猎量情况下，了解鹅种群人口统计与当地社会生态环境的相互作用。模型结果表明，没有证据表明，水禽狩猎是出于经济利益，社会和文化的重要性是更强的因素。大多数猎人了解物种的保护状况;然而，11%的人不知道LWfG受到保护，这突出了增加利益相关者参与的关键领域。对20年来LWfG种群增长的模拟表明，即使在存活率很高的情况下，LWfG也极易受到狩猎压力的影响。狩猎的这种潜在影响突出表明，需要有效的监管沿着整个飞行路线;我们的调查结果显示，猎人普遍遵守新出台的狩猎法规，表明有效的监管是可能的地方一级。 合成与应用。在这里，我们调查全球保护政策和当地规范如何相互作用，影响受威胁的迁徙物种的管理，这是特别重要的保护和可持续管理的野生动物跨越国际边界，当地的情况可能有所不同。我们的研究强调，为了长期有效和可持续，全球保护政策必须充分整合当地的社会经济，文化，治理和环境背景，以确保干预措施在整个物种范围内是公平的。这种方法是相关的，并适用于涉及保护广泛和迁徙物种的不同情况，包括UN-AEWA（联合国保护非洲-欧亚迁徙水鸟协定）所涵盖的255种迁徙水鸟。在这里，我们调查全球保护政策和当地规范如何相互作用，影响受威胁的迁徙物种的管理，这是特别重要的保护和可持续管理的野生动物跨越国际边界，当地的情况可能有所不同。我们的研究强调，为了长期有效和可持续，全球保护政策必须充分整合当地的社会经济，文化，治理和环境背景，以确保干预措施在整个物种范围内是公平的。这种方法是相关的，并适用于涉及保护广泛和迁徙物种的不同情况，包括UN-AEWA（联合国保护非洲-欧亚迁徙水鸟协定）所涵盖的255种迁徙水鸟。
Migratory species are protected under international legislation; their seasonal movements across international borders may therefore present opportunities for understanding how global conservation policies translate to local‐level actions across different socio‐ecological contexts. Moreover, local‐level management of migratory species can reveal how culture and governance affects progress towards achieving global targets. Here, we investigate potential misalignment in the two‐way relationship between global‐level conservation policies (i.e. hunting bans and quotas) and local‐level norms, values and actions (i.e. legal and illegal hunting) in the context of waterfowl hunting in northern Kazakhstan as a case‐study. Northern Kazakhstan is globally important for waterfowl and a key staging area for arctic‐breeding species. Hunting is managed through licences, quotas and seasonal bans under UN‐AEWA intergovernmental agreements. To better understand the local socio‐ecological context of waterfowl hunting, we take a mixed‐methods approach using socio‐ecological surveys, informal discussions and population modelling of a focal migratory goose species to: (a) investigate motivations for hunting in relation to socio‐economic factors; (b) assess knowledge of species' protection status; and (c) predict the population size of Lesser White‐fronted Geese (LWfG; Anser erythropus; IUCN Vulnerable) under different scenarios of survival rates and hunting offtake, to understand how goose population demographics interact with the local socio‐ecological context. Model results showed no evidence that waterfowl hunting is motivated by financial gain; social and cultural importance were stronger factors. The majority of hunters are knowledgeable about species' protection status; however, 11% did not know LWfG are protected, highlighting a key area for increased stakeholder engagement. Simulations of LWfG population growth over a 20‐year period showed LWfG are highly vulnerable to hunting pressure even when survival rates are high. This potential impact of hunting highlights the need for effective regulation along the entire flyway; our survey results show that hunters were generally compliant with newly introduced hunting regulations, showing that effective regulation is possible on a local level. Synthesis and applications. Here, we investigate how global conservation policy and local norms interact to affect the management of a threatened migratory species, which is particularly important for the protection and sustainable management of wildlife that crosses international borders where local contexts may differ. Our study highlights that to be effective and sustainable in the long‐term, global conservation policies must fully integrate local socio‐economic, cultural, governance and environmental contexts, to ensure interventions are equitable across entire species' ranges. This approach is relevant and adaptable for different contexts involving the conservation of wide‐ranging and migratory species, including the 255 migratory waterfowl covered by UN‐AEWA (United Nations Agreement on the Conservation of African‐Eurasian Migratory Waterbirds). Here, we investigate how global conservation policy and local norms interact to affect the management of a threatened migratory species, which is particularly important for the protection and sustainable management of wildlife that crosses international borders where local contexts may differ. Our study highlights that to be effective and sustainable in the long‐term, global conservation policies must fully integrate local socio‐economic, cultural, governance and environmental contexts, to ensure interventions are equitable across entire species' ranges. This approach is relevant and adaptable for different contexts involving the conservation of wide‐ranging and migratory species, including the 255 migratory waterfowl covered by UN‐AEWA (United Nations Agreement on the Conservation of African‐Eurasian Migratory Waterbirds).
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
6.5
作者：
Madsen J;Williams JH;Johnson FA;Tombre IM;Dereliev S;Kuijken E
通讯作者：
Kuijken E
影响因子：
27.6
作者：
Fritz, Steffen;See, Linda;West, Sarah
通讯作者：
West, Sarah
影响因子：
8.5
作者：
Cusack, Jeremy J.;Duthie, A. Brad;Bunnefeld, Nils
通讯作者：
Bunnefeld, Nils
DOI：
10.1098/rstb.2011.0175
发表时间：
2012-01-19
影响因子：
6.3
作者：
Milner-Gulland, E. J.
通讯作者：
Milner-Gulland, E. J.
影响因子：
6.6
作者：
Duthie, A. Bradley;Cusack, Jeremy J.;Bunnefeld, Nils
通讯作者：
Bunnefeld, Nils