Highly sensitive detection of malaria parasitemia in a malaria-endemic setting: performance of a new loop-mediated isothermal amplification kit in a remote clinic in Uganda.

Highly sensitive detection of malaria parasitemia in a malaria-endemic setting: performance of a new loop-mediated isothermal amplification kit in a remote clinic in Uganda.
复制标题

在疟疾流行环境中对疟疾寄生虫血症的高度敏感性检测:在乌干达偏远诊所中新的环路介导的等温扩增试剂盒的性能。

DOI:
10.1093/infdis/jit184
复制
发表时间:
2013-08-15
期刊:
The Journal of infectious diseases
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Bell D
Bell D
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hopkins H;González IJ;Polley SD;Angutoko P;Ategeka J;Asiimwe C;Agaba B;Kyabayinze DJ;Sutherland CJ;Perkins MD;Bell D

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

背景:目前的疟疾诊断测试,包括显微镜和抗原检测快速测试,不能可靠地检测低密度感染。 聚合酶链反应等分子方法非常敏感,但对于实地部署来说仍然过于复杂。一种新的商业分子检测的基础上环介导的等温扩增(LAMP)进行了评估,现场使用。方法:对来自乌干达乡村诊所的272名门诊患者的样本进行疟疾LAMP(日本Eiken Chemical)评价,并与专家显微镜、巢式PCR和定量PCR(qPCR)进行比较。 两名技术人员在3天培训后使用2种替代血液样品制备方法进行测定,并通过荧光测定法对结果进行目视判读。结果:与3孔巢式PCR相比,LAMP和单孔巢式PCR的敏感性均为90%,显微镜检查的敏感性为51%。 对于恶性疟原虫qPCR滴度≥2个寄生虫/µL的样本,LAMP灵敏度为97.8%(95%置信区间,93.7%-99.5%)。大多数假阴性LAMP结果涉及寄生虫血症水平可通过3孔巢式PCR检测但通过qPCR检测非常低或不可检测的样品。结论:疟疾LAMP在乌干达一个偏远的诊所达到了与英国参考实验室的单孔巢式PCR相似的灵敏度。 LAMP大大降低了在疟疾流行环境中可达到的检测阈值,为消除战略中的诊断、监测和筛查提供了新的工具。
Background. Current malaria diagnostic tests, including microscopy and antigen-detecting rapid tests, cannot reliably detect low-density infections. Molecular methods such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) are highly sensitive but remain too complex for field deployment. A new commercial molecular assay based on loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) was assessed for field use. Methods. Malaria LAMP (Eiken Chemical, Japan) was evaluated for samples from 272 outpatients at a rural Ugandan clinic and compared with expert microscopy, nested PCR, and quantitative PCR (qPCR). Two technicians performed the assay after 3 days of training, using 2 alternative blood sample–preparation methods and visual interpretation of results by fluorescence assay. Results. Compared with 3-well nested PCR, the sensitivity of both LAMP and single-well nested PCR was 90%; the microscopy sensitivity was 51%. For samples with a Plasmodium falciparum qPCR titer of ≥2 parasites/µL, LAMP sensitivity was 97.8% (95% confidence interval, 93.7%–99.5%). Most false-negative LAMP results involved samples with parasitemia levels detectable by 3-well nested PCR but very low or undetectable by qPCR. Conclusions. Malaria LAMP in a remote Ugandan clinic achieved sensitivity similar to that of single-well nested PCR in a United Kingdom reference laboratory. LAMP dramatically lowers the detection threshold achievable in malaria-endemic settings, providing a new tool for diagnosis, surveillance, and screening in elimination strategies.
DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-10-370
发表时间: 2011-12-16
期刊: Malaria journal
影响因子: 3
作者:
Manjurano A;Okell L;Lukindo T;Reyburn H;Olomi R;Roper C;Clark TG;Joseph S;Riley EM;Drakeley C
通讯作者: Drakeley C
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013733
发表时间: 2010-10-29
期刊: PloS one
影响因子: 3.7
作者:
Lucchi NW;Demas A;Narayanan J;Sumari D;Kabanywanyi A;Kachur SP;Barnwell JW;Udhayakumar V
通讯作者: Udhayakumar V
DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.2011.10-0507
发表时间: 2011-06-01
影响因子: 3.3
作者:
Campos, Ivon M.;Uribe, Mary L.;Maestre, Amanda
通讯作者: Maestre, Amanda
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008410
发表时间: 2009-12-22
期刊: PLOS ONE
影响因子: 3.7
作者:
Ouedraogo, Andre Lin;Bousema, Teun;Sauerwein, Robert
通讯作者: Sauerwein, Robert
DOI: 10.1086/526502
发表时间: 2008-02-15
影响因子: 6.4
作者:
Hopkins, Heidi;Bebell, Lisa;Dorsey, Grant
通讯作者: Dorsey, Grant