Intersectional trends in employment quality in older adults in the United States.
Intersectional trends in employment quality in older adults in the United States.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100868
复制
发表时间：
2021-09
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Hajat A
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Andrea SB;Eisenberg-Guyot J;Peckham T;Oddo VM;Hajat A
在过去的几十年里，美国人的工作生活变得越来越不稳定。就业质量的恶化与较差的身心健康有关，并可能对边缘化工作人口产生不成比例的影响。我们研究了美国（US）跨性别、种族/民族、教育亚组的老年工人之间工人-雇主关系的质量和特征的差异。利用健康与退休研究（1992-2016）中关于就业稳定性、物质奖励、工人权利、工作时间安排、工会组织和人际权力关系的纵向数据，我们使用主成分分析来构建就业质量（EQ）评分。我们使用广义估计方程估计了总体上和随时间变化的EQ的交叉差异。总体而言，拥有大学学历的白人男性情商最高，而拥有高中以下学历的拉丁裔女性情商最低。随着时间的推移，EQ在相交地层上趋于不变或略有恶化；拥有大学学历的拉丁裔女性的情商下降幅度最大，而拥有高中学历的白人女性的情商提高幅度最大。在美国，被边缘化的老年人在情商方面存在着持续不断的不平等，这可能会导致健康不平等的加剧。
Americans' working lives have become more precarious over the past several decades. Worsening employment quality has been linked to poorer physical and mental health and may disproportionately impact marginalized working populations. We examined differences in the quality and character of worker-employer relationships among older workers in the United States (US) across intersecting gender-racial/ethnic-educational subgroups. Using longitudinal data on employment stability, material rewards, workers’ rights, working-time arrangements, unionization, and interpersonal power relations from the Health and Retirement Study (1992–2016), we used principal components analysis to construct an employment quality (EQ) score. We estimated intersectional differences in EQ, overall and over time, using generalized estimating equations. Overall, EQ was greatest for white men with college degrees and poorest for Latinx women with < high school degrees. Over time, EQ tended to remain unchanged or slightly worsen across intersectional strata; the greatest EQ reduction was for Latinx women with college degrees, while the greatest improvement was for white women with high school degrees. There are enduring and growing inequities in EQ for older marginalized adults in the US, which may contribute to growing health inequities.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
6.3
作者：
Benach, J.;Muntaner, C.
通讯作者：
Muntaner, C.
DOI：
10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113327
发表时间：
2020-11
期刊：
Social science & medicine (1982)
影响因子：
--
作者：
Eisenberg-Guyot J;Peckham T;Andrea SB;Oddo V;Seixas N;Hajat A
通讯作者：
Hajat A
影响因子：
3.7
作者：
Visser, Mark;Gesthuizen, Maurice;Wolbers, Maarten H. J.
通讯作者：
Wolbers, Maarten H. J.
影响因子：
3.7
作者：
Vives A;Benmarhnia T;González F;Benach J
通讯作者：
Benach J
DOI：
10.7758/rsf.2019.5.4.09
发表时间：
2019-09-01
影响因子：
3.8
作者：
Peckham, Trevor;Fujishiro, Kaori;Seixas, Noah
通讯作者：
Seixas, Noah