Linking electoral realignment to welfare politics: an assessment of partisan effects on active labour market policy in post-industrial democracies

Linking electoral realignment to welfare politics: an assessment of partisan effects on active labour market policy in post-industrial democracies
复制标题

将选举调整与福利政治联系起来:评估党派对后工业民主国家积极劳动力市场政策的影响

DOI:
10.1057/s41295-021-00246-5
复制
发表时间:
2021
影响因子:
1.7
通讯作者:
Hieda Takeshi
Hieda Takeshi
中科院分区:
法学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
千野貴裕;山本圭;Hieda Takeshi

文献摘要

参考文献

相似文献

本文探讨了发达民主国家积极劳动力市场政策变化的政治决定因素。具体而言,它调查的条件下,一个福利国家容纳,而不是无视劳动力市场的局外人的利益。依靠后工业选举调整的文献,本文认为,不仅在社会经济,而且在社会文化层面的意识形态取向决定了劳动力市场方案的政党的政策偏好。本研究假设,自由主义政府比专制政府更有可能支持人力资本形成的劳动力市场的局外人。对1985年至2017年21个发达工业化国家内阁分期数据的分析表明,左翼和右翼自由主义政府倾向于在积极的劳动力市场计划上进行公共支出,从而支持本研究的假设。此外,它还表明,虽然左翼自由主义政府增加直接创造就业计划的支出,但右翼自由主义政府也增加了就业援助和培训计划的支出。
This article examines the political determinants of the variations in active labour market policies across advanced democracies. Specifically, it investigates the conditions under which a welfare state accommodates rather than disregards the interests of labour market outsiders. Relying on the literature on post-industrial electoral realignment, this article argues that ideological orientations not only in socio-economic but also in sociocultural dimensions dictate the policy preferences of political parties for labour market programmes. This study then hypothesizes that libertarian governments are more likely than authoritarian governments to support human capital formation of labour market outsiders. An analysis of cabinet-based periodization data of 21 advanced industrialized countries from 1985 to 2017 shows that left- and right-libertarian governments favour public spending on active labour market programmes, thereby supporting this study’s hypothesis. Furthermore, it also reveals that while left-libertarian governments increase expenditures for direct job creation schemes, right-libertarian ones do so for employment assistance and training programmes.
比较政治学中的面板数据分析:方法与理论的联系
DOI: --
发表时间: 2005
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Thomas Plümper;Vera E. Troeger;P. Manow
通讯作者: P. Manow
DOI: --
发表时间: 2010
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Silja Häusermann
通讯作者: Silja Häusermann
DOI: --
发表时间: 2004
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Herbert P. Kitschelt
通讯作者: Herbert P. Kitschelt
从困境到二元化:“不愿移民的国家”的社会和移民政策
DOI: --
发表时间: 2012
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Romana Careja;P. Emmenegger
通讯作者: P. Emmenegger
DOI: --
发表时间: 2002
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Kittel;H. Winner;Link
通讯作者: Link