Does Impedance Matter When Recording Spikes With Polytrodes?
Does Impedance Matter When Recording Spikes With Polytrodes?
复制标题
DOI:
10.3389/fnins.2018.00715
复制
发表时间:
2018
影响因子:
4.3
通讯作者:
Kampff AR
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Neto JP;Baião P;Lopes G;Frazão J;Nogueira J;Fortunato E;Barquinha P;Kampff AR
Extracellular microelectrodes have been widely used to measure brain activity, yet there are still basic questions about the requirements for a good extracellular microelectrode. One common source of confusion is how much an electrode’s impedance affects the amplitude of extracellular spikes and background noise. Here we quantify the effect of an electrode’s impedance on data quality in extracellular recordings, which is crucial for both the detection of spikes and their assignment to the correct neurons. This study employs commercial polytrodes containing 32 electrodes (177 μm2) arranged in a dense array. This allowed us to directly compare, side-by-side, the same extracellular signals measured by modified low impedance (∼100 kΩ) microelectrodes with unmodified high impedance (∼1 MΩ) microelectrodes. We begin with an evaluation of existing protocols to lower the impedance of the electrodes. The poly (3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)-polystyrene sulfonate (PEDOT-PSS) electrodeposition protocol is a simple, stable, and reliable method for decreasing the impedance of a microelectrode up to 10-fold. We next record in vivo using polytrodes that are modified in a ‘chess board’ pattern, such that the signal of one neuron is detected by multiple coated and non-coated electrodes. The performance of the coated and non-coated electrodes is then compared on measures of background noise and amplitude of the detected action potentials. If the proper recording system is used, then the impedance of a microelectrode within the range of standard polytrodes (∼0.1 to 2 MΩ) does not greatly affect data quality and spike sorting. This study should encourage neuroscientists to stop worrying about one more unknown.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.3389/fneng.2010.00005
发表时间:
2010
期刊:
Frontiers in neuroengineering
影响因子:
--
作者:
Desai SA;Rolston JD;Guo L;Potter SM
通讯作者:
Potter SM
影响因子:
4.3
作者:
Obien ME;Deligkaris K;Bullmann T;Bakkum DJ;Frey U
通讯作者:
Frey U
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
Du J;Blanche TJ;Harrison RR;Lester HA;Masmanidis SC
通讯作者:
Masmanidis SC
影响因子:
14
作者:
Green, Rylie A.;Lovell, Nigel H.;Poole-Warren, Laura A.
通讯作者:
Poole-Warren, Laura A.
影响因子:
4.6
作者:
Cui, XY;Martin, DC
通讯作者:
Martin, DC