Livestock Disease Management for Trading Across Different Regulatory Regimes.
Livestock Disease Management for Trading Across Different Regulatory Regimes.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s10393-018-1312-y
复制
发表时间：
2018-06
期刊：
影响因子：
2.5
通讯作者：
Touza J
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bate AM;Jones G;Kleczkowski A;Naylor R;Timmis J;White PCL;Touza J
牲畜健康的维护取决于许多不同行为者在不同监管框架内和跨不同监管框架采取的联合行动。先前的工作认识到，私人风险管理选择有能力减少感染向贸易伙伴的传播。我们评估农民的替代性生物安全选择的效率，从他们自己的单方面战略的利益，并量化他们可能在过滤贸易的疾病外部性的影响。我们使用牛病毒性腹泻（BVD）在英格兰和苏格兰作为案例研究，因为这提供了一个例子的情况下，BVD管理策略的对比发生在销售和购买农场。我们使用一个基于代理的生物经济模型来评估农民的收益依赖贸易连接，但使用不同的BVD管理策略。我们比较了三种疾病管理行动：试验扑杀，试验扑杀与疫苗接种和单独接种。对于两个农场的贸易情况，出售农场所采取的所有行动都为购买农场提供了避免疾病的实质性利益，其中最大的利益来自于出售农场的疫苗接种试验性扑杀。同样，购买者的单方面疾病战略可有效减少贸易造成的疾病风险。我们的结论是，监管需要平衡私人收益之间的权衡，从那些承担疾病管理成本和对他人的积极溢出效应。
The maintenance of livestock health depends on the combined actions of many different actors, both within and across different regulatory frameworks. Prior work recognised that private risk management choices have the ability to reduce the spread of infection to trading partners. We evaluate the efficiency of farmers’ alternative biosecurity choices in terms of their own-benefits from unilateral strategies and quantify the impact they may have in filtering the disease externality of trade. We use bovine viral diarrhoea (BVD) in England and Scotland as a case study, since this provides an example of a situation where contrasting strategies for BVD management occur between selling and purchasing farms. We use an agent-based bioeconomic model to assess the payoff dependence of farmers connected by trade but using different BVD management strategies. We compare three disease management actions: test-cull, test-cull with vaccination and vaccination alone. For a two-farm trading situation, all actions carried out by the selling farm provide substantial benefits to the purchasing farm in terms of disease avoided, with the greatest benefit resulting from test-culling with vaccination on the selling farm. Likewise, unilateral disease strategies by purchasers can be effective in reducing disease risks created through trade. We conclude that regulation needs to balance the trade-off between private gains from those bearing the disease management costs and the positive spillover effects on others.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
3.4
作者：
Bennett, R
通讯作者：
Bennett, R
DOI：
10.1111/j.1467-8276.2007.01088.x
发表时间：
2007-01-01
影响因子：
4.2
作者：
Hennessy, David A.
通讯作者：
Hennessy, David A.
通过贸易管理动态流行病学风险。
影响因子：
1.9
作者：
Horan RD;Fenichel EP;Finnoff D;Wolf CA
通讯作者：
Wolf CA
影响因子：
3.3
作者：
Courcoul, Aurelie;Ezanno, Pauline
通讯作者：
Ezanno, Pauline
影响因子：
2.6
作者：
HOUE, H;PEDERSEN, KM;MEYLING, A
通讯作者：
MEYLING, A