Insecticide resistance mediated by an exon skipping event.
Insecticide resistance mediated by an exon skipping event.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1111/mec.13882
复制
发表时间:
2016-11
影响因子:
4.9
通讯作者:
Bass C
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Berger M;Puinean AM;Randall E;Zimmer CT;Silva WM;Bielza P;Field LM;Hughes D;Mellor I;Hassani-Pak K;Siqueira HA;Williamson MS;Bass C
Many genes increase coding capacity by alternate exon usage. The gene encoding the insect nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) α6 subunit, target of the bio‐insecticide spinosad, is one example of this and expands protein diversity via alternative splicing of mutually exclusive exons. Here, we show that spinosad resistance in the tomato leaf miner, Tuta absoluta is associated with aberrant regulation of splicing of Taα6 resulting in a novel form of insecticide resistance mediated by exon skipping. Sequencing of the α6 subunit cDNA from spinosad selected and unselected strains of T. absoluta revealed all Taα6 transcripts of the selected strain were devoid of exon 3, with comparison of genomic DNA and mRNA revealing this is a result of exon skipping. Exon skipping cosegregated with spinosad resistance in survival bioassays, and functional characterization of this alteration using modified human nAChR α7, a model of insect α6, demonstrated that exon 3 is essential for receptor function and hence spinosad sensitivity. DNA and RNA sequencing analyses suggested that exon skipping did not result from genetic alterations in intronic or exonic cis‐regulatory elements, but rather was associated with a single epigenetic modification downstream of exon 3a, and quantitative changes in the expression of trans‐acting proteins that have known roles in the regulation of alternative splicing. Our results demonstrate that the intrinsic capacity of the α6 gene to generate transcript diversity via alternative splicing can be readily exploited during the evolution of resistance and identifies exon skipping as a molecular alteration conferring insecticide resistance.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
7.3
作者:
Howard, Jonathan M.;Sanford, Jeremy R.
通讯作者:
Sanford, Jeremy R.
DOI:
10.1073/pnas.0500543102
发表时间:
2005-04-05
影响因子:
11.1
作者:
Ibrahim, EC;Schaal, TD;Maniatis, T
通讯作者:
Maniatis, T
影响因子:
12.3
作者:
Langmead B;Trapnell C;Pop M;Salzberg SL
通讯作者:
Salzberg SL
影响因子:
5.8
作者:
Conesa, A;Götz, S;Robles, M
通讯作者:
Robles, M
DOI:
10.1038/nrm.2015.2
发表时间:
2016-01
期刊:
Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology
影响因子:
--
作者:
Dominguez AA;Lim WA;Qi LS
通讯作者:
Qi LS