Comparing the effects of focal and conventional tDCS on motor skill learning: A proof of principle study.
Comparing the effects of focal and conventional tDCS on motor skill learning: A proof of principle study.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.neures.2022.01.006
复制
发表时间：
2022-05
影响因子：
2.9
通讯作者：
Spampinato, Danny A.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Iannone, Aline;Santiago, Irene;Ajao, Silvia T.;Brasil-Neto, Joaquim;Rothwell, John C.;Spampinato, Danny A.
我们比较了传统TDCS的后效与更集中、更有针对性的方法。TDCS蒙太奇选择影响运动技能学习。我们发现，它也影响神经生理学结果与定向TMS测量。经颅直流电刺激（tDCS）已成为临床和行为神经科学中一种有前途的干预措施;然而，对这种技术的反应变异性限制了其影响，部分原因是传统方法的电流流动广泛。在这里，我们调查是否更有针对性的，集中的方法在初级运动皮层（M1）是有利于运动学习和针对特定的神经元群体。我们的初步研究结果表明，局灶性刺激导致增强技能学习和差异招聘不同的途径M1。这一发现表明，焦点tDCS的方法可能会改善未来的研究，旨在提高行为的结果。
We compare the after-effects of conventional TDCS to a more focal, targeted approach. TDCS montage selection influences motor skill learning. We show that it also influences neurophysiological outcomes measured with directional TMS. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has emerged as a promising intervention in clinical and behavioral neuroscience; however, the response variability to this technique has limited its impact, partly due to the widespread of current flow with conventional methods. Here, we investigate whether a more targeted, focal approach over the primary motor cortex (M1) is advantageous for motor learning and targeting specific neuronal populations. Our preliminary results show that focal stimulation leads to enhanced skill learning and differentially recruits distinct pathways to M1. This finding suggests that focal tDCS approaches may improve the outcomes of future studies aiming to enhance behavior.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.016
发表时间：
2009-12
期刊：
Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology
影响因子：
--
作者：
Rossi S;Hallett M;Rossini PM;Pascual-Leone A;Safety of TMS Consensus Group
通讯作者：
Safety of TMS Consensus Group
影响因子：
4.6
作者：
Lefebvre, Stephanie;Jann, Kay;Liew, Sook-Lei
通讯作者：
Liew, Sook-Lei
DOI：
10.1017/s1355617716000345
发表时间：
2016-10-01
影响因子：
2.6
作者：
Doppelmayr, Michael;Pixa, Nils Henrik;Steinberg, Fabian
通讯作者：
Steinberg, Fabian
影响因子：
5.3
作者：
Cantarero, Gabriela;Spampinato, Danny;Celnik, Pablo
通讯作者：
Celnik, Pablo
影响因子：
4.6
作者：
Masina F;Arcara G;Galletti E;Cinque I;Gamberini L;Mapelli D
通讯作者：
Mapelli D