Automatic and controlled response inhibition: associative learning in the go/no-go and stop-signal paradigms.
Automatic and controlled response inhibition: associative learning in the go/no-go and stop-signal paradigms.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/a0013170
复制
发表时间：
2008-11
影响因子：
4.1
通讯作者：
Logan, Gordon D.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Verbruggen, Frederick;Logan, Gordon D.
在五个实验中，作者研究了在走/不走范式和一个修改版本的停止信号范式中自动反应抑制的发展。他们假设，当刺激始终与停止联系在一起时，自动反应抑制可能会在练习中发展。所有五个实验都包括一个训练阶段和一个测试阶段，在测试阶段，刺激映射被反转为刺激的子集。与自动抑制假说一致，作者发现，当刺激一直与训练阶段的停止联系在一起时，测试阶段的反应就会减慢。此外，他们发现反应抑制受益于持续的刺激-停止关联。这些发现表明，反应抑制可能依赖于在具有一致的刺激-停止映射的练习后对刺激-停止关联的检索。刺激-停止映射在去/不去范式中通常是一致的，因此很可能发生自动抑制。然而，在停止信号范式中，刺激-停止映射通常是不一致的，因此不太可能发生自动抑制。因此，结果表明，这两种范式并不等同，因为它们允许不同类型的反应抑制。
In five experiments, the authors examined the development of automatic response inhibition in the go/no-go paradigm and a modified version of the stop-signal paradigm. They hypothesized that automatic response inhibition may develop over practice when stimuli are consistently associated with stopping. All five experiments consisted of a training phase and a test phase in which the stimulus mapping was reversed for a subset of the stimuli. Consistent with the automatic-inhibition hypothesis, the authors found that responding in the test phase was slowed when the stimulus had been consistently associated with stopping in the training phase. In addition, they found that response inhibition benefited from consistent stimulus-stop associations. These findings suggest that response inhibition may rely on the retrieval of stimulus-stop associations after practice with consistent stimulus-stop mappings. Stimulus-stop mapping is typically consistent in the go/no-go paradigm, so automatic inhibition is likely to occur. However, stimulus-stop mapping is typically inconsistent in the stop-signal paradigm, so automatic inhibition is unlikely to occur. Thus, the results suggest that the two paradigms are not equivalent because they allow different kinds of response inhibition.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
2.3
作者：
Fillmore, MT;Rush, CR;Hays, L
通讯作者：
Hays, L
影响因子：
4.1
作者：
Gomez, Pablo;Perea, Manuel;Ratcliff, Roger
通讯作者：
Ratcliff, Roger
影响因子：
10.6
作者：
Crawford, TJ;Higham, S;Tetley, S
通讯作者：
Tetley, S
影响因子：
9.9
作者：
Hershey, T;Revilla, FJ;Perlmutter, JS
通讯作者：
Perlmutter, JS
影响因子：
5.3
作者：
Aron, Adam R.;Behrens, Tim E.;Poldrack, Russell A.
通讯作者：
Poldrack, Russell A.