The unintended consequences of regulatory import: the Basel Accord’s failure during the financial crisis

The unintended consequences of regulatory import: the Basel Accord’s failure during the financial crisis
复制标题

监管进口的意外后果:巴塞尔协议在金融危机期间的失败

DOI:
10.1080/13501763.2020.1725096
复制
发表时间:
2020
影响因子:
4.2
通讯作者:
Linder
Linder
中科院分区:
管理学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Becker;Linder

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

本文探讨了在何种程度上,监管进口(RI),一个常见的,但研究不足的治理模式,在政权复合体,是一个独立的因素,在2008年全球金融危机。RI描述了一种特定的治理模式,当监管机构明确地将外部论坛的重要功能治理纳入自己的监管时,就会出现这种模式,从而使自己的绩效依赖于外部机构。虽然RI与专业化等好处有关,但它可能会导致意想不到的后果。对外部权威的片面依赖可能导致非互补性治理或监管失败的输入,并损害监管者的绩效。我们以巴塞尔银行监管委员会为例说明我们的论点,该委员会从国际会计准则委员会和信用评级机构引进了治理权威。本文发现,在2008年金融危机中,风险投资对巴塞尔委员会的监管绩效产生了两个负面影响。首先,会计规则的不协调变化增加了顺周期效应,加剧了银行业危机。第二,引入信用评级机构的信用风险度量,导致对风险敞口的误判。
This article examines to what extent regulatory import (RI), a common, but understudied mode of governance in regime complexes, was a separate factor of the global financial crisis in 2008. RI describes a specific mode of governance that occurs when regulators explicitly incorporate functionally important governance from an external forum to their own regulations, thus making their own performance dependent on external agency. While RI is associated with benefits, such as specialisation, it could cause unintended consequences. The one-sided dependence on external authority could result in the import of non-complementary governance or regulatory failures and undermine the regulator’s performance. We illustrate our argument with the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision that imported governance authority from the International Accounting Standards Board and credit rating agencies. The paper finds two negative consequences of RI for the Basel Committee’s regulatory performance in the 2008 financial crisis. First, uncoordinated changes of accounting rules increased pro-cyclical effects that exacerbated the banking crisis. Second, import of credit risk measurement from credit rating agencies led to misjudgement of risk exposure.
金砖国家挑战的局限性:信用评级改革和全球金融制度创新
DOI: 10.1080/09692290.2018.1490330
发表时间: 2018
影响因子: 4.3
作者:
E. Helleiner;Hongying Wang
通讯作者: Hongying Wang
国际组织中的授权与代理:无政府状态下的授权:国家、国际组织和委托代理理论
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511491368.002
发表时间: 2006
影响因子: 4.2
作者:
Darren Hawkins;David A. Lake;D. Nielson;M. Tierney
通讯作者: M. Tierney
DOI: 10.1111/j.1835-2561.2012.00184.x
发表时间: 2012
影响因子: 3.4
作者:
W. McGregor
通讯作者: W. McGregor
会计中的责任?公共利益中的私人规则制定的政治
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2005.00282.x
发表时间: 2005
期刊: Governance
影响因子: 2.9
作者:
W. Mattli;Tim Büthe
通讯作者: Tim Büthe
监管中介机构理论化
DOI: --
发表时间: 2017
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Kenneth W. Abbott;D. Levi‐Faur;D. Snidal
通讯作者: D. Snidal