Predictive gaze cues and personality judgments: Should eye trust you?
Predictive gaze cues and personality judgments: Should eye trust you?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01737.x
复制
发表时间：
2006-06
影响因子：
8.2
通讯作者：
Tipper SP
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bayliss AP;Tipper SP
虽然跟随他人的目光在流畅的社交互动中是必不可少的，但这种凝视暗示效应的反射性质意味着凝视可以用来欺骗。在凝视提示过程中，参与者看到了几张向左或向右看的脸。有些面孔总是看向目标（预测有效），有些面孔从不看向目标（预测无效），还有一些面孔看向和远离目标的比例相等（非预测）。标准的凝视提示效应似乎不受这些偶然事件的影响。然而，参与者倾向于选择预测有效的面孔，因为它们比预测无效的面孔更值得信赖。这种效应与评估自闭症样特征的量表分数呈负相关。此外，我们提出了初步的证据表明，“欺骗性”的面孔编码更强烈的记忆比“合作”的面孔。这些数据证明了注意力、凝视感知、面部身份识别和个性判断之间的重要相互作用。
Although following another person's gaze is essential in fluent social interactions, the reflexive nature of this gaze-cuing effect means that gaze can be used to deceive. In a gaze-cuing procedure, participants were presented with several faces that looked to the left or right. Some faces always looked to the target (predictive-valid), some never looked to the target (predictive-invalid), and others looked toward and away from the target in equal proportions (nonpredictive). The standard gaze-cuing effects appeared to be unaffected by these contingencies. Nevertheless, participants tended to choose the predictive-valid faces as appearing more trustworthy than the predictive-invalid faces. This effect was negatively related to scores on a scale assessing autistic-like traits. Further, we present tentative evidence that the “deceptive” faces were encoded more strongly in memory than the “cooperative” faces. These data demonstrate the important interactions among attention, gaze perception, facial identity recognition, and personality judgments.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
1.7
作者：
Hietanen, JK
通讯作者：
Hietanen, JK
影响因子：
2.6
作者：
Pelphrey, KA;Singerman, JD;McCarthy, G
通讯作者：
McCarthy, G
影响因子：
3.5
作者：
Friesen, CK;Kingstone, A
通讯作者：
Kingstone, A
影响因子：
8.2
作者：
Macrae, CN;Hood, BM;Mason, MF
通讯作者：
Mason, MF
影响因子：
4
作者：
Bayliss, AP;Tipper, SP
通讯作者：
Tipper, SP