Asymmetric genetic attributions for one's own prosocial versus antisocial behavior.
Asymmetric genetic attributions for one's own prosocial versus antisocial behavior.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/00224545.2022.2058906
复制
发表时间：
2024-05-03
影响因子：
2.1
通讯作者：
Appelbaum, Paul S.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Lebowitz, Matthew S.;Tabb, Kathryn;Appelbaum, Paul S.
人们倾向于认为亲社会或积极的行为比反社会或消极的行为更受演员基因的影响。目前的研究测试了人们在评价基因在自己行为中的作用时是否会表现出类似的不对称性，如果是这样，什么变量可能会调解这种差异。参与者被要求思考他们自己过去一年的行为，无论是亲社会还是反社会。那些在亲社会条件下的人认为遗传在导致行为方面的作用明显大于反社会条件下的人。一项中介分析表明，这种不对称可以解释为倾向于认为亲社会行为比反社会行为更自然，更符合一个人的真实自我。这些发现增加了越来越多的证据，表明人们对遗传学的推理可能受到评价性判断的影响。
People tend to rate prosocial or positive behavior as more strongly influenced by the actor’s genes than antisocial or negative behavior. The current study tested whether people would show a similar asymmetry when rating the role of genes in their own behavior, and if so, what variables might mediate this difference. Participants were prompted to think about an example of their own behavior from the past year that was either prosocial or antisocial. Those in the prosocial condition rated the role of genetics in causing the behavior as significantly greater than did those in the antisocial condition. A mediation analysis suggested that this asymmetry could be accounted for by a tendency to view prosocial behavior as more natural and more aligned with one’s true self than antisocial behavior. These findings add to a growing body of evidence suggesting that people’s reasoning about genetics may be influenced by evaluative judgments.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
7.2
作者：
Turkheimer, E
通讯作者：
Turkheimer, E
影响因子：
2.6
作者：
Willoughby, Emily A.;Love, Alan C.;Lee, James J.
通讯作者：
Lee, James J.
影响因子：
0.9
作者：
de Geus, Eco J. C.;Bartels, Meike;Thomis, Martine
通讯作者：
Thomis, Martine
影响因子：
2.6
作者：
Lynch, Kate E.;Morandini, James S.;Griffiths, Paul E.
通讯作者：
Griffiths, Paul E.
影响因子：
2.7
作者：
Condit, Celeste M.
通讯作者：
Condit, Celeste M.