权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Values and Ecological Risk Assessment: Two Policy Paradigms

价值观和生态风险评估：两种政策范式

基本信息

批准号：
9512133
负责人：
Kristin Shrader-Frechette
金额：
$ 9万
依托单位：
University of South Florida
依托单位国家：
美国
项目类别：
Continuing Grant
财政年份：
1996
资助国家：
美国
起止时间：
1996-02-01 至 1999-01-31
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=9512133&HistoricalAwards=false
关键词：
Values Ecological Risk Assessment Two

项目摘要

This research project is undertaken by an experienced team: a philosopher who specializes in environmental risk assessment and the ethics of scientific research and a biologist who specializes in habitat evaluation and ecological restoration. The project has four objectives: to examine and clarify the ethical dimensions of two dominant paradigms of ecological risk assessment; to discover major ethical assumptions built into the paradigms, so as to clarify the normative dimensions of these procedures; to assess the ethical consequences, for ecological research and environmental management, of alternative stances on questions about the normative foundations of these paradigms; and to evaluate the ethical adequacy of important applications of these assessments. The research plan involves careful reading and analysis of ecological risk assessments that incorporate the animal-toxicity and the ecological health approaches to identify and clarify their value assumptions and ethical implications. The investigators will consider such questions as whether ecological risk assessment should include ethical goals or advocacy, economic measures of welfare, public preferences, or standards of ethical rationality. Related questions include, whether the burden of proof should lie on ecologists or risk imposers and which assessment paradigm is likely to lead to greater good. Through presentations and publications, the project teams expects to participate in on-going debates about the ethical aspects of ecological research and its environmental applications and about the contributions that ecologists can make to ethical debates about environmental issues. The project will result in articles and presentations, and a book length monograph.

该研究项目由一个经验丰富的团队承担：一位专门从事环境风险评估和科学研究伦理的哲学家和一位专门从事栖息地评估和生态恢复的生物学家。该项目有四个目标：审查和澄清生态风险评估的两个主要范例的道德方面;发现范例中的主要道德假设，以澄清这些程序的规范方面;评估对这些范例的规范基础问题的不同立场对生态研究和环境管理的道德后果;并评估这些评估的重要应用在道德上是否适当。研究计划包括仔细阅读和分析生态风险评估，其中包括动物毒性和生态健康的方法，以确定和澄清其价值假设和伦理影响。调查人员将考虑这样的问题，生态风险评估是否应包括道德目标或宣传，福利的经济措施，公众的偏好，或道德合理性的标准。相关的问题包括，举证责任是否应该落在生态学家或风险施加者身上，以及哪种评估范式可能带来更大的好处。通过演讲和出版物，项目团队希望参与有关生态研究及其环境应用的伦理方面以及生态学家可以为有关环境问题的伦理辩论做出的贡献的持续辩论。该项目将导致文章和演示文稿，以及一本书的篇幅专著。