Environmental Ethics, Uncertainty, and Preservation Policy: The Case of the Florida Scrub

环境伦理、不确定性和保护政策:佛罗里达灌木丛案例

基本信息

  • 批准号:
    9112661
  • 负责人:
  • 金额:
    $ 8.11万
  • 依托单位:
  • 依托单位国家:
    美国
  • 项目类别:
    Standard Grant
  • 财政年份:
    1992
  • 资助国家:
    美国
  • 起止时间:
    1992-08-15 至 1995-07-31
  • 项目状态:
    已结题

项目摘要

This research enables a biologist and a philosopher to examine two ethical issues related to science. On the abstract level, they will consider what ethical principles are relevant to ecologists' interpretations of uncertain scientific results that might have consequences for environmental policy. Concretely, they will consider how ecologists should apply these principles to a current problem in policy, preservation of the unique and rare Florida scrub habitat. The investigators begin having completed an analysis of normative assumptions involved in ecological concepts and conclusions. In this project, they will consider how conflicts between ethical principles can be resolved, by developing second-order principles and examining alternative, plausible consequences from their use. They will test their results from this procedure by examining the case of the preservation of the Florida scrub habitat. Because the case is environmentally significant but biologically uncertain, the ethical constraints on how to interpret research relevant to its preservation are likely to be applicable in many situations of environmental ethics and public policy. The research has three objectives: to examine the ethical obligations of ecologists in interpreting and disseminating their results; to identify the normative assumptions in alternative positions on how ecologists ought to interpret their results in problematic cases; and to assess the consequences, in a specific case, of taking particular stands on interpretation and dissemination. The results should illuminate public and professional debates about ethical standards for science and scientific obligations to the public.
这项研究使生物学家和哲学家能够研究 两个与科学有关的伦理问题。 在抽象层面上, 他们会考虑什么样的道德原则与 生态学家对不确定的科学结果的解释, 可能会对环境政策产生影响。 具体地说, 他们将考虑生态学家应该如何应用这些原则 目前的政策问题,保护独特的, 罕见的佛罗里达灌木栖息地。 调查人员开始 完成了对涉及的规范性假设的分析, 生态概念和结论。 在这个项目中,他们将 考虑伦理原则之间的冲突如何 通过发展二阶原理和研究 替代的,合理的后果。 他们将 测试他们的结果,从这个程序通过检查的情况下, 保护佛罗里达的灌木栖息地。 由于案件 具有环境意义,但在生物学上不确定, 如何解释与其相关的研究的伦理约束 保存可能适用于许多情况, 环境伦理和公共政策。 该研究有三个 目的:审查生态学家在以下方面的道德义务: 解释和传播其结果; 关于生态学家如何 应该在有问题的案件中解释其结果;以及 评估在特定情况下, 立足于诠释和传播。 结果应 启发公众和专业人士对道德问题的辩论 科学标准和科学对公众的义务。

项目成果

期刊论文数量(0)
专著数量(0)
科研奖励数量(0)
会议论文数量(0)
专利数量(0)

数据更新时间:{{ journalArticles.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
  • DOI:
    {{ item.doi }}
  • 发表时间:
    {{ item.publish_year }}
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    {{ item.factor }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.authors }}
  • 通讯作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ journalArticles.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ monograph.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ sciAawards.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ conferencePapers.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ patent.updateTime }}

Kristin Shrader-Frechette其他文献

Flawed attacks on contemporary human rights: Laudan, Sunstein, and the cost-benefit state
  • DOI:
    10.1007/s12142-005-1004-1
  • 发表时间:
    2005-10-01
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    1.300
  • 作者:
    Kristin Shrader-Frechette
  • 通讯作者:
    Kristin Shrader-Frechette
Agriculture, Property, and procedural justice
  • DOI:
    10.1007/bf01530709
  • 发表时间:
    1984-06-01
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    3.600
  • 作者:
    Kristin Shrader-Frechette
  • 通讯作者:
    Kristin Shrader-Frechette
Equity and nuclear waste disposal
Non-Indigenous Species and Ecological Explanation
  • DOI:
    10.1023/a:1011953713083
  • 发表时间:
    2001-09-01
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    1.800
  • 作者:
    Kristin Shrader-Frechette
  • 通讯作者:
    Kristin Shrader-Frechette
Comparativist Rationality and

Kristin Shrader-Frechette的其他文献

{{ item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
  • DOI:
    {{ item.doi }}
  • 发表时间:
    {{ item.publish_year }}
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    {{ item.factor }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.authors }}
  • 通讯作者:
    {{ item.author }}

{{ truncateString('Kristin Shrader-Frechette', 18)}}的其他基金

Scholars Award: Three Methodological Rules in Risk Assessment
学者奖:风险评估的三大方法论规则
  • 批准号:
    0724781
  • 财政年份:
    2007
  • 资助金额:
    $ 8.11万
  • 项目类别:
    Continuing Grant
Nuclear Technology and the Ethics of Worker Radiation Risk
核技术与工人辐射风险道德
  • 批准号:
    9810611
  • 财政年份:
    1999
  • 资助金额:
    $ 8.11万
  • 项目类别:
    Standard Grant
Values and Ecological Risk Assessment: Two Policy Paradigms
价值观和生态风险评估:两种政策范式
  • 批准号:
    9512133
  • 财政年份:
    1996
  • 资助金额:
    $ 8.11万
  • 项目类别:
    Continuing Grant
Laws and Explanation in Community Ecology
群落生态学的规律与解释
  • 批准号:
    9112445
  • 财政年份:
    1992
  • 资助金额:
    $ 8.11万
  • 项目类别:
    Standard Grant
Normative Concepts in Ecology and Their Consequences for Enviromental Policy
生态学的规范概念及其对环境政策的影响
  • 批准号:
    8619533
  • 财政年份:
    1988
  • 资助金额:
    $ 8.11万
  • 项目类别:
    Standard Grant
Ethical and Value Issues in Siting Low-Level Radioactive Waste Facilities
低放射性废物设施选址的道德和价值问题
  • 批准号:
    8209517
  • 财政年份:
    1983
  • 资助金额:
    $ 8.11万
  • 项目类别:
    Standard Grant
Four Methodological Assumptions in Risk-Cost-Benefit Analysis
风险成本效益分析中的四种方法假设
  • 批准号:
    8205112
  • 财政年份:
    1982
  • 资助金额:
    $ 8.11万
  • 项目类别:
    Standard Grant

相似海外基金

Project Incubation: Training Undergraduates in Collaborative Research Ethics
项目孵化:培养本科生合作研究伦理
  • 批准号:
    2316154
  • 财政年份:
    2024
  • 资助金额:
    $ 8.11万
  • 项目类别:
    Standard Grant
The Ethics of Voluntary Assisted Dying: Promoting Constructive Debate
自愿辅助死亡的伦理:促进建设性辩论
  • 批准号:
    DP240102614
  • 财政年份:
    2024
  • 资助金额:
    $ 8.11万
  • 项目类别:
    Discovery Projects
Feedback Literacy and AI Ethics: Leveraging Auto-Peer for Productive Interaction with Generative AI Tools in L2 Writing Education in Japan
反馈素养和人工智能道德:在日本二语写作教育中利用 Auto-Peer 与生成式人工智能工具进行富有成效的互动
  • 批准号:
    24K04103
  • 财政年份:
    2024
  • 资助金额:
    $ 8.11万
  • 项目类别:
    Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
"Ethical Review to Support Responsible AI in Policing - A Preliminary Study of West Midlands Police's Specialist Data Ethics Review Committee "
“支持警务中负责任的人工智能的道德审查——西米德兰兹郡警察专家数据道德审查委员会的初步研究”
  • 批准号:
    AH/Z505626/1
  • 财政年份:
    2024
  • 资助金额:
    $ 8.11万
  • 项目类别:
    Research Grant
Development and Impact Assessment of an Interactive Online System for Computing Ethics Education
计算机伦理教育交互式在线系统的开发和影响评估
  • 批准号:
    2337132
  • 财政年份:
    2024
  • 资助金额:
    $ 8.11万
  • 项目类别:
    Standard Grant
The Ethics of Randomization in Social Science Experiments
社会科学实验中随机化的伦理
  • 批准号:
    2316155
  • 财政年份:
    2024
  • 资助金额:
    $ 8.11万
  • 项目类别:
    Standard Grant
Doctoral Dissertation Research: Encoding the Human in AI Development, Ethics, and Safety Communities
博士论文研究:人工智能开发、伦理和安全社区中的人类编码
  • 批准号:
    2342518
  • 财政年份:
    2024
  • 资助金额:
    $ 8.11万
  • 项目类别:
    Standard Grant
Vulnerability & The Other Non-Human Animal: a Phenomenological Approach to Animal Ethics
漏洞
  • 批准号:
    2906707
  • 财政年份:
    2024
  • 资助金额:
    $ 8.11万
  • 项目类别:
    Studentship
Development and Impact Assessment of an Interactive Online System for Computing Ethics Education
计算机伦理教育交互式在线系统的开发和影响评估
  • 批准号:
    2337133
  • 财政年份:
    2024
  • 资助金额:
    $ 8.11万
  • 项目类别:
    Standard Grant
Moral Injury and the Ethics of Military Conditioning
道德伤害与军事训练的伦理
  • 批准号:
    DP240102082
  • 财政年份:
    2024
  • 资助金额:
    $ 8.11万
  • 项目类别:
    Discovery Projects
{{ showInfoDetail.title }}

作者:{{ showInfoDetail.author }}

知道了