权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

GRK 1608: Self-Making. Practices of Subjectivation in Historical and Interdisciplinary Perspective

GRK 1608：自我创造。

基本信息

批准号：
118660364
负责人：
金额：
--
依托单位：
Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg
依托单位国家：
德国
项目类别：
Research Training Groups
财政年份：
2010
资助国家：
德国
起止时间：
2009-12-31 至 2018-12-31
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/118660364?language=en
关键词：
GRK 1608 Self Making.Practices

项目摘要

The status of the subject and its capacity for agency has become one of the key issues of current times. The apparent dominance of market mechanisms, technical automatisms, and genetics is juxtaposed with a demand for lifelong learning, flexibility, creativity, and compe-tence. At the same time, people engage in new forms of protest and resistance, self - model-ing, and self-liberation by means of dropping out and abstention. Subsequently, what seemed to be a ¿decline of the subject¿ in debates of the humanities in the 1980s, now appears to us as a radicalization and pluralization of the subjectivity of the subject. This is no longer about the sovereign subject, but rather the emergence of (intrinsically) fragmented subjectivities in disparate historical contexts. Consequently, we look beyond conceptual considerations to the process of subjectivation in (everyday) social practices. As an analytical category, subjectivation allows us to unearth the phenomenon of self-making across historical epochs. With its focus on practices, subject analysis, we argue, is interdisciplinary: it incorporates material arrangements, discourses, and techniques within which and through which subjects form themselves and are being formed. During the first phase of our graduate research group the focus was on how people grow into specific subject forms and the mutability of these forms. However, our empirical studies have made us aware of the ambivalence and challenges of these formation processes and the need for negotiation, reflection, and criticism in practices. Thus, our empirical studies have brought to light a blind spot of current practice theories: they fail to address how the capabili-ties of self-orientation and (critical) reflection ¿ both characteristics traditionally associated with an autonomous subject ¿ are acquired in practices. However, these issues must be tackled if we wish to comprehend not only social reproduction, but also transformation, inno-vation, and transgression without arguing for the return of the autonomous subject. Therefore, in the second phase of our graduate research group we will focus on the simultaneity of the formation of social order and its subjects in contingent historical practices. The interrelation of three research fields (formation of dispositions; actualization of action potential; trans-formation, criticism, and exit) brings to the forefront the emergence and appearance of (re-flexive) abilities through which individuals make themselves accountable as subjects. The programmatic aim of our concept is an interdisciplinary praxeology of subjectivation.

主体的地位和主体的能动性已成为当今时代的关键问题之一。市场机制、技术自动化和遗传学的明显主导地位与对终身学习、灵活性、创造力和能力的需求并存。与此同时，人们通过退学、退隐等方式进行新形式的抗议和反抗、自我塑造和自我解放。随后，在20世纪80年代的人文学科辩论中似乎是主体的衰落，现在在我们看来是主体主体性的激进化和多元化。这不再是关于主权主体，而是在不同的历史背景下（本质上）分裂的主体性的出现。因此，我们超越概念上的考虑，看到（日常）社会实践中的主观化过程。作为一个分析范畴，主体化使我们能够挖掘出跨越历史时代的自我创造现象。我们认为，主体分析以实践为重点，是跨学科的：它包含了主体形成和正在形成的物质安排、话语和技术。在我们的研究生研究小组的第一阶段，重点是人们如何成长为特定的学科形式和这些形式的可变性。然而，我们的实证研究使我们意识到这些形成过程的矛盾和挑战，以及在实践中进行谈判、反思和批评的必要性。因此，我们的实证研究揭示了当前实践理论的一个盲点：它们未能解决自我定向和（批判）反思的能力-这两个传统上与自主主体相关的特征-是如何在实践中获得的。然而，如果我们希望不仅理解社会再生产，而且理解变革、创新和超越，而不主张自主主体的回归，就必须解决这些问题。因此，在我们研究生研究小组的第二阶段，我们将集中在偶然的历史实践中的社会秩序及其主体的形成的偶然性。三个研究领域（性格的形成;动作电位的实现;转化、批评和退出）的相互关系使（自反性）能力的出现和出现成为最前沿的问题，通过这些能力，个体使自己成为主体。我们概念的纲领性目标是主体化的跨学科行为学。