A Role for Declarative and Procedural Memory in Language

人类的语言依赖于一本词汇词典（心理词典）和一些规则，这些规则规定了如何将这些单词组合成更大的单词、短语和句子（心理语法）。 这两种基本语言能力的计算和大脑基础仍然没有得到很好的理解。 该项目研究了一种新的观点，即两种语言能力的学习和使用取决于两种更通用的记忆系统，其神经基础相对较好地研究。 具体来说，它是假设，收购和使用的话取决于“陈述性记忆”颞叶脑回路先前显示的基础学习和使用的事实知识，如斑马是什么，它的生活。 也有人假设，语法规则的获得和使用取决于“程序性记忆”，左额叶/基底神经节脑回路先前被证明是运动和认知“技能”的学习和表达的基础，例如骑自行车。 在这种“陈述性/程序性”的语言观中，词汇和语法与不同的通用系统相联系，每个系统负责一组特定的语言和非语言功能。 陈述/程序观点与先前提出的关于语言的计算和神经机制的两大类理论形成对比。 它与传统的“双系统”理论观点相同，即词汇和语法依赖于不同的系统，但它与他们声称这些系统只负责语言的说法不同。 相反，虽然陈述性/程序性观点同意“单一系统”理论，即两种语言能力取决于通用的大脑回路，但它与他们的主张不同，即两种能力都与大脑中广泛分布的单一系统有关。为了区分这三种观点，该项目将侧重于语言中的一个简单区别：过去时态和语言其他方面的规则和不规则转换之间的区别。 在这个区别中，词汇和语法可以被对比，而其他心理相关因素保持不变。 不规则变换至少部分是任意的（例如，sing-sang，bring-bringed），因此必须依赖于存储器，而规则变换是可预测的（例如，动词+ -艾德），因此可以通过语法规则来计算。 因此，可以预测不规则（词汇）、事实和颞叶回路之间的联系，以及规则（语法）、技能和额叶/基底神经节回路之间的联系。 脑损伤仅限于特定颞叶区域的患者（例如，“后失语症”）应该有更多的麻烦与非正规比正规，并与事实比技能。 损伤仅限于特定左额叶/基底神经节结构的患者（例如，“前失语症”）应显示相反的模式。 如果陈述性记忆系统和程序性记忆系统确实在词汇和语法中发挥作用，那么对人类和动物两种大脑记忆系统的神经、计算和发育基础的大量研究数据将有助于我们理解语言。 相反，在我们对语言结构、加工和习得的了解的基础上，研究这两种记忆系统的新方法将成为可能。 词汇和语法的测试，如在拟议的项目中使用的测试，可能会成为这两个大脑系统的有用探针。 除了认知科学基础知识的进步，动物和人类对两个大脑系统的研究对我们理解语言的贡献，应该会导致新的临床方法来诊断和治疗获得性和发育性语言障碍。

Human language depends upon a dictionary of words (the mental lexicon) and rules which specify how those words are put together into larger words, phrases, and sentences (the mental grammar). The computational and brain bases of these two fundamental language capacities are still not well understood. This project investigates the novel view that the learning and use of the two language capacities depends upon two more general-purpose memory systems whose neural foundations are relatively well studied. Specifically, it is hypothesized that the acquisition and use of words depends upon "declarative memory" temporal-lobe brain circuits previously shown to underlie the learning and use of fact knowledge, such as what a zebra is and where it lives. It is also hypothesized that the acquisition and use of grammatical rules depends upon "procedural memory" left frontal/basal-ganglia brain circuits previously shown to underlie the learning and expression of motor and cognitive "skills," such as riding a bicycle. On this "declarative/procedural" view of language, lexicon and grammar are linked to distinct general-purpose systems, each responsible for a particular set of language and non-language functions. The declarative/procedural view contrasts with the two main classes of previously proposed theories regarding the computational and neural mechanisms of language. It shares the perspective of traditional "dual-system" theories that lexicon and grammar depend upon distinct systems, but it diverges from their claim that these systems are responsible for language alone. Conversely, while the declarative/procedural view agrees with "single-system" theories that the two language capacities depend upon general-purpose brain circuitry, it diverges from their claim that both capacities are linked to a single system with a broad distribution in the brain. To distinguish the three views, the project will focus on a simple distinction in language: between regular and irregular transformations in past tense and in other aspects of language. In this distinction lexicon and grammar can be contrasted, while other psychologically relevant factors are held constant. Irregular transformations are at least partially arbitrary (e.g., sing-sang, bring-brought), and therefore must depend upon memory, whereas regular transformations are predictable (e.g., verb + -ed), and so could be computed by a grammatical rule. Thus links are predicted among irregulars (lexicon), facts, and temporal-lobe circuits, and among regulars (grammar), skills, and frontal/basal-ganglia circuits. Patients with brain damage limited to particular temporal-lobe areas (e.g., "posterior aphasics") should have more trouble with irregulars than regulars, and with facts than skills. Patients with damage limited to particular left frontal/basal-ganglia structures (e.g., "anterior aphasics") should show the opposite pattern. If indeed the declarative and procedural memory systems play a role in lexicon and grammar, then data from numerous investigations of the neural, computational, and developmental underpinnings of the two brain memory systems in humans and in animals will contribute to our understanding of language. Conversely, new approaches to the study of the two memory systems will become possible on the basis of our knowledge of language structure, processing, and acquisition. Tests of lexicon and grammar, such as those used in the proposed project, may become useful probes of the two brain systems. In addition to the advancement of fundamental knowledge in cognitive science, the contributions of animal and human studies of the two brain systems to our understanding of language should lead to new clinical approaches for the diagnosis and treatment of acquired and developmental language disorders.