SGER: Effects of Terrorism on Judgments and Decisions Concerning Civil Liberties

SGER：恐怖主义对有关公民自由的判断和决定的影响

• 批准号: 0202448
• 负责人: Michael Birnbaum
• 金额: $ 2.36万
• 依托单位: CSU Fullerton Auxiliary Services Corporation
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 项目类别: Standard Grant
• 财政年份: 2002
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2002-01-01 至 2003-12-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=0202448&HistoricalAwards=false
• 关键词: SGER; Effects; Terrorism; Judgments; Decisions

This proposal studies changes in opinion and judgment that follow as consequences of the ongoing "War on Terrorism," declared in response to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. It is anticipated that military and diplomatic success and failure and renewed terrorist events will influence opinions regarding security versus liberty. The research will be done in the lab, by national telephone polling, and via the Internet using several of the new WWW methods for conducting research.The primary goal of the research is to study models of how biasing phrases affect judged agreement with questions posed in polls. It has long been known that the results of polls depend strongly on how questions are worded. This research will attempt to separate the effects of bias from those of more stable "true" psychological values.A secondary goal is to compare results obtained with inexpensive, efficient, new Internet methods to those obtained from more standard polling. This project will also attempt to determine which of several Internet methods of sampling is most accurate in matching the results of more standard polling.

本提案研究了2001年9月11日恐怖袭击事件后宣布的正在进行的“反恐战争”的后果所带来的意见和判断的变化。 预计军事和外交的成败以及新的恐怖主义事件将影响人们对安全还是自由的看法。 这项研究将在实验室中进行，通过全国电话民意调查，并通过互联网使用几个新的WWW方法进行research.The研究的主要目标是研究模型的偏见短语如何影响判断与民意调查中提出的问题的一致性。 人们早就知道，民意调查的结果在很大程度上取决于问题的措辞。 本研究将试图将偏见的影响与更稳定的“真实”心理价值观的影响区分开来。第二个目标是将廉价、有效、新的互联网方法获得的结果与更标准的民意调查结果进行比较。 本项目还将试图确定几种互联网抽样方法中哪一种在匹配更标准的民意调查结果方面最准确。