Political agenda-building under the conditions of a hybrid media system - a comparison across countries and issues

混合媒体系统条件下的政治议程建设——不同国家和问题的比较

基本信息

项目摘要

This study addresses the question of how online communication changes political communication in contemporary democracy with respect to the hopes that the internet can grant those without access to political decision making a platform to mobilize issues and opinions and set the agenda for journalists, politicians and a broad public. Within this framework, our study focuses on media agenda-building. We assume that the democratic potential of online communication lies in spill-over of challengers’ issue networks into traditional media and political debate. In particular we expect that the characteristics of challengers’ online issue networks, i.e. dominant coalitions, frame strength and type of frame-sponsors, affect the likelihood of a breakthrough to traditional media. Our empirical program is to assess issue-specific online networks and analyze under what conditions their issues and frames appear in traditional print media. In the first period of the project we use two issues in environmental policy (Co2 emissions) and consumer/health policy (food safety). While these issues represent left wing challenger’s causes, in the second period of the project we will choose two right wing issues and trace additionally the consequences of online issue dynamics with respect to the political agenda. The project applies a comparative research design to control for political and media opportunity structures in four countries (Germany, Switzerland, UK, US). Empirically, we use content and network analysis to assess the issue-specific debates in the internet and in traditional news media.
这项研究解决了在线传播如何改变当代民主政治传播的问题,希望互联网能够为那些无法参与政治决策的人提供一个动员问题和意见的平台,并为记者、政客和广大公众设定议程。在这一框架下,我们的研究重点是媒体议程建设。我们认为,在线交流的民主潜力在于挑战者的问题网络溢出到传统媒体和政治辩论中。特别是,我们预计挑战者的在线问题网络的特点,即占主导地位的联盟、帧强度和帧赞助商的类型,会影响向传统媒体突破的可能性。我们的经验项目是评估特定问题的在线网络,并分析它们的问题和框架在什么条件下出现在传统的印刷媒体中。在项目的第一阶段,我们使用环境政策(二氧化碳排放)和消费者/健康政策(食品安全)中的两个问题。虽然这些问题代表了左翼挑战者的原因,但在项目的第二阶段,我们将选择两个右翼问题,并额外追踪在线问题动态对政治议程的影响。该项目采用比较研究设计,对四个国家(德国、瑞士、英国、美国)的政治和媒体机会结构进行控制。在经验上,我们使用内容和网络分析来评估互联网和传统新闻媒体中针对特定问题的辩论。

项目成果

期刊论文数量(13)
专著数量(0)
科研奖励数量(0)
会议论文数量(0)
专利数量(0)
Homophily and prestige: An assessment of their relative strength to explain link formation in the online climate change debate
  • DOI:
    10.1016/j.socnet.2018.05.001
  • 发表时间:
    2018-10
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    0
  • 作者:
    H. Schmid-Petri;S. Adam;U. Reber;T. Häussler;D. Maier;P. Miltner;B. Pfetsch;A. Waldherr
  • 通讯作者:
    H. Schmid-Petri;S. Adam;U. Reber;T. Häussler;D. Maier;P. Miltner;B. Pfetsch;A. Waldherr
Constructing an illusion of scientific uncertainty? Framing climate change in German and British print media
构建科学不确定性的幻觉?
  • DOI:
    10.1515/commun-2016-0011
  • 发表时间:
    2016
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    0
  • 作者:
    Schmid-Petri
  • 通讯作者:
    Schmid-Petri
Politicization of science: how climate change skeptics use experts and scientific evidence in their online communication
  • DOI:
    10.1007/s10584-017-2112-z
  • 发表时间:
    2017-11
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    4.8
  • 作者:
    H. Schmid-Petri
  • 通讯作者:
    H. Schmid-Petri
Do Conservative Media Provide a Forum for Skeptical Voices? The Link Between Ideology and the Coverage of Climate Change in British, German, and Swiss Newspapers
保守媒体是否为怀疑的声音提供了论坛?
  • DOI:
    10.1080/17524032.2017.1280518
  • 发表时间:
    2017
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    0
  • 作者:
    Schmid-Petri
  • 通讯作者:
    Schmid-Petri
Heating up the debate? Measuring fragmentation and polarisation in a German climate change hyperlink network
  • DOI:
    10.1016/j.socnet.2017.10.002
  • 发表时间:
    2018-07-01
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    3.1
  • 作者:
    Haussler, Thomas
  • 通讯作者:
    Haussler, Thomas
{{ item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
  • DOI:
    {{ item.doi }}
  • 发表时间:
    {{ item.publish_year }}
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    {{ item.factor }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.authors }}
  • 通讯作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ journalArticles.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ monograph.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ sciAawards.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ conferencePapers.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ patent.updateTime }}

Professorin Dr. Barbara Pfetsch其他文献

Professorin Dr. Barbara Pfetsch的其他文献

{{ item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
  • DOI:
    {{ item.doi }}
  • 发表时间:
    {{ item.publish_year }}
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    {{ item.factor }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.authors }}
  • 通讯作者:
    {{ item.author }}

{{ truncateString('Professorin Dr. Barbara Pfetsch', 18)}}的其他基金

Politische Kommunikationskultur in Frankreich - Eine empirische Bestandsaufnahme in vergleichender Perspektive
法国的政治传播文化——比较视角下的实证盘点
  • 批准号:
    85378942
  • 财政年份:
    2008
  • 资助金额:
    --
  • 项目类别:
    Research Grants
Political Communication Cultures in Western Europe - A Comparative Study
西欧政治传播文化——比较研究
  • 批准号:
    34732204
  • 财政年份:
    2007
  • 资助金额:
    --
  • 项目类别:
    Research Grants

相似海外基金

An Alternative Mode of Student Well-Being or Unhappy Schools? Exploring Interdependence in Education across East and Southeast Asia, Building Evidence to Impact the Post-SDG 2030 Global Policy Agenda
学生福祉的替代模式还是不快乐的学校?
  • 批准号:
    23K25636
  • 财政年份:
    2024
  • 资助金额:
    --
  • 项目类别:
    Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
Building an agenda and community of biodiversity data science
建立生物多样性数据科学议程和社区
  • 批准号:
    2329533
  • 财政年份:
    2024
  • 资助金额:
    --
  • 项目类别:
    Standard Grant
An Alternative Mode of Student Well-Being or Unhappy Schools? Exploring Interdependence in Education across East and Southeast Asia, Building Evidence to Impact the Post-SDG 2030 Global Policy Agenda
学生福祉的替代模式还是不快乐的学校?
  • 批准号:
    23H00939
  • 财政年份:
    2023
  • 资助金额:
    --
  • 项目类别:
    Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
Caring for Older People Living with HIV in Long-Term Care and Assisted Living in BC's Fraser Health Region - Building a Partnered Research Agenda With Stakeholder Communities
在 BC 省弗雷泽卫生区的长期护理和辅助生活中照顾艾滋病毒感染者 - 与利益相关者社区制定合作研究议程
  • 批准号:
    467739
  • 财政年份:
    2022
  • 资助金额:
    --
  • 项目类别:
    Operating Grants
Building Capacity to Develop a Collaborative Research Agenda on Project-Based Learning as a Mechanism for Program and Institutional Transformation
建设能力以制定基于项目的学习的合作研究议程作为计划和机构转型的机制
  • 批准号:
    2020978
  • 财政年份:
    2020
  • 资助金额:
    --
  • 项目类别:
    Standard Grant
Developing a Patient-Oriented Rehabilitation Research Agenda
制定以患者为中心的康复研究议程
  • 批准号:
    363877
  • 财政年份:
    2016
  • 资助金额:
    --
  • 项目类别:
    Operating Grants
Building a Unified Research Agenda for K-12 Online Learning Environments to Improve STEM Outcomes for Students with Learning Disabilities and Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder
为 K-12 在线学习环境建立统一的研究议程,以改善有学习障碍的学生和患有自闭症谱系障碍的学生的 STEM 成果
  • 批准号:
    1431148
  • 财政年份:
    2014
  • 资助金额:
    --
  • 项目类别:
    Continuing Grant
Workshop: PFI: BIC Smart Service Systems Grantees Meeting and Workshop toward Building a Rigorous Research Agenda for Service Systems.
研讨会:PFI:BIC 智能服务系统受资助者会议和研讨会,旨在建立严格的服务系统研究议程。
  • 批准号:
    1449113
  • 财政年份:
    2014
  • 资助金额:
    --
  • 项目类别:
    Standard Grant
Building a Collaborative Learning Research Agenda for Natural History Museums in the UK
为英国自然历史博物馆制定协作学习研究议程
  • 批准号:
    ES/L00125X/2
  • 财政年份:
    2014
  • 资助金额:
    --
  • 项目类别:
    Research Grant
Building an Arctic Enteric Infections Research Agenda
制定北极肠道感染研究议程
  • 批准号:
    314898
  • 财政年份:
    2014
  • 资助金额:
    --
  • 项目类别:
    Miscellaneous Programs
{{ showInfoDetail.title }}

作者:{{ showInfoDetail.author }}

知道了