Collaborative Research: Contentious Issues in World Politics: Updating the ICOW Dataset

这个项目提供了额外的数据收集的问题相关的战争（ICOW）项目，一个合作项目共同指导的保罗R。亨塞尔（北德克萨斯大学）和萨拉麦克劳克林米切尔（爱荷华州大学）。 ICOW项目收集两个或多个国家之间涉及有争议边界的地缘政治冲突的信息，包括陆地边界（或岛屿），海洋区域和跨境河流的冲突。 迄今为止，该项目已编码并公开了自1816年以来在北美、中美洲和南美洲、西欧和东欧以及中东发生的450多起问题冲突的信息。 该项目已经研究过的一些激烈争议地区包括福克兰群岛、丰塞卡湾、约旦河和阿尔萨斯-洛林。 对这些数据的分析已经使我们了解到，各国何时可能诉诸军事化手段来解决地缘政治问题，以及和平冲突管理努力何时能够取得成功。 拟议的项目涉及完成关于目前未包括在委员会项目范围内的其余区域（非洲、亚洲和大洋洲）的边界争端（1816-2001年）、海洋争端（1900 - 2001年）和河流争端（1900-2001年）的数据收集工作。 ICOW项目记录了有关所声称的问题对每个有关国家的重要性的信息，以及为解决有争议的问题而进行的所有和平外交和军事化尝试。 和平尝试包括争端双方之间的双边会谈，以及第三方通过调解、仲裁、裁决等方式解决争议问题的努力。迄今为止，该项目已记录了2005年在美洲、欧洲和中东地区和平与军事化解决争端的尝试。 项目完成后，我们将把案件年表上传到网站，这将使决策者更容易获得有关每一个历史和正在发生的边界争端的详细信息。 从理论上讲，这个项目通过使用新的数据来研究新的有争议的问题出现的过程，问题导致长期国家间竞争的过程，以及管理和解决问题的国际机构的相对成功，扩大了我们对问题的理解。 第一，审查新冲突出现的方式。 一些国家对，如马达加斯加-尼加拉瓜和法国-德国，在他们的历史互动过程中出现了许多不同的地缘政治问题，而其他国家对则完全避免了这种冲突。 这些冲突的一个明显的预测因素是它们发生的基本机会，例如通过共同的陆地边界。 在水资源更加稀缺且由于人口和工业需求较多而需求量更高的地区，也更有可能发生水资源纠纷。 该项目还侧重于国家？国内机构和参与国际组织（如联合国）。 民主国家和国际组织成员国是否有更相似的外交政策偏好，从而避免地缘政治冲突，或者他们只是用和平工具更有效地管理出现的问题？ 初步分析支持后一种解释，尽管来自亚洲、非洲和大洋洲的更多数据将确保这些结果的普遍性。 第二，基于地缘政治问题的新的竞争措施。 这包括两个或两个以上正在进行的问题冲突或两个或两个以上军事争端的国家对同一问题。 这些措施提供了一个更清晰的画面，冲突管理过程中的不同问题的竞争和非竞争的环境。 最后，主要调查人员将其先前关于机构和冲突管理的工作加以扩展。 例如，海洋问题可以由《海洋法公约》（UNCLOS）等具体问题组织管理，也可以由欧洲联盟和联合国等更一般的组织管理。 他们研究哪些类型的组织最适合帮助各国达成成功且持久的协议。 除了这些新的研究课题之外，新扩展的数据还将使学者们能够通过引入有关殖民历史更丰富地区的问题冲突的信息来改进以前对殖民遗产等因素的研究。

This project provides for additional data collection by the Issue Correlates of War (ICOW) project, a collaborative project co-directed by Paul R. Hensel (University of North Texas) and Sara McLaughlin Mitchell (University of Iowa). The ICOW project collects information on geopolitical conflicts between two or more countries involving disputed boundaries, including conflicts over land boundaries (or islands), maritime areas, and cross-border rivers. To date, the project has coded and made public information on over 450 issue conflicts since 1816 in North, Central, and South America, Western and Eastern Europe, and the Middle East. Some examples of hotly contested areas already studied by the project include the Falkland Islands, the Gulf of Fonseca, the Jordan river, and Alsace-Lorraine. Analysis of this data has already taught us a great deal about when countries are likely to resort to militarized means to resolve geopolitical issues, as well as when peaceful conflict management efforts are well positioned to succeed. The proposed project involves completion of data collection on border disputes (1816-2001), maritime disputes (1900-2001), and river disputes (1900-2001) for the remaining regions not currently covered by the ICOW project: Africa, Asia, and Oceania. The ICOW project records information on the importance of the claimed issue to each state involved, as well as all peaceful diplomatic and militarized attempts to resolve the contested issue. Peaceful attempts include bilateral talks between the disputants, as well as third party efforts to resolve the contested issue using mediation, arbitration, adjudication, etc. To date, the project has recorded information on 2005 peaceful and militarized attempts to settle issue claims in the Americas, Europe, and the Middle East. When the project is complete, we will upload case chronologies to the website, which will make it easier for policy makers to access detailed information about each historical and ongoing boundary dispute. Theoretically, this project expands our understanding of issues by using the new data to study the process by which new contentious issues arise, the process by which issues lead to long-term interstate rivalries, and the relative success of international institutions for managing and settling issues. First, the manner in which new conflicts emerge is examined. Some pairs of states, such as Honduras-Nicaragua and France-Germany, have had lots of different geopolitical issues arise throughout the course of their historical interactions, while other pairs of states avoid such conflicts altogether. One obvious predictor of these conflicts involves basic opportunities for them to occur, such as through shared land borders. Water-based disputes are also more likely to occur in areas where water is more scarce and in higher demand due to larger population and industrial needs. This project also focuses on countries? domestic institutions and participation in international organizations (such as the United Nations). Do democracies and international organization members have more similar foreign policy preferences and thus avoid geopolitical conflicts, or do they simply manage issues that arise more efficiently with peaceful tools? Initial analyses support the latter explanation, although additional data from Asia, Africa, and Oceania will ensure the generalizability of these results. Second, a new measure of rivalry based on geopolitical issues is developed. This includes pairs of countries with two or more ongoing issue conflicts or two or more militarized disputes over the same issue. These measures provide a clearer picture of the process of conflict management differs in issue rivalry and issue non-rivalry environments. Finally, the principal investigators extend their previous work on institutions and conflict management. Maritime issues, for example, can be managed by issue specific organizations like the Law of the Sea Convention (UNCLOS) or by more general organizations like the European Union and United Nations. They examine which types of organizations are best suited to helping states reach successful and long-lasting agreements. Beyond these new research topics, the newly expanded data will also allow scholars to improve previous research on factors such as colonial legacies by introducing information about issue conflicts in regions with richer colonial histories.