Collaborative Research: Showups vs. Lineups: A Comparison of Two Identification Techniques

合作研究：出场与阵容：两种识别技术的比较

• 批准号: 1060902
• 负责人: Scott Gronlund
• 金额: $ 11.47万
• 依托单位: University of Oklahoma Norman Campus
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 项目类别: Standard Grant
• 财政年份: 2011
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2011-06-01 至 2015-05-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1060902&HistoricalAwards=false
• 关键词: Collaborative; Research; Showups; vs.; Lineups

In the area of eyewitness identification, few studies compare showups (one-person identifications), simultaneous lineups (all lineup members viewed simultaneously), and sequential lineups (lineup members viewed one at a time) to determine which is most accurate. The current research involves a series of experiments in which participants will first watch a staged video of multiple perpetrators breaking into a storage unit and then complete a showup, sequential lineup, and simultaneous lineup, each involving a different suspect. Finally, participants will indicate their confidence in their decision and complete additional questions about the manipulation and witnessing experience. The current research has three objectives: to compare identification accuracy between showups and lineups within a single set of studies; to develop techniques that improve eyewitness identification; and to promote a better understanding of the underlying memory and decision-making processes that occur in showup and lineup identifications using formal computational models. The research focuses on improving eyewitness identification in showups and reducing the fallibility of eyewitness evidence leading to the wrongful conviction of the innocent.

在目击者识别领域，很少有研究比较出场（一人识别）、同步阵容（所有阵容成员同时观看）和顺序阵容（一次观看一个阵容成员）来确定哪一种最准确。目前的研究涉及一系列实验，参与者首先观看多个犯罪者闯入存储单元的分阶段视频，然后完成一次展示、顺序排列和同时排列，每一个都涉及不同的嫌疑人。最后，参与者将表明他们对自己的决定的信心，并完成有关操纵和见证经历的其他问题。当前的研究有三个目标：在一组研究中比较出场和阵容之间的识别准确性；开发改进目击者识别的技术；并促进更好地理解使用正式计算模型出现和阵容识别中发生的底层记忆和决策过程。该研究的重点是提高现场目击者的识别能力，并减少目击者证据的错误性，从而导致无辜者被错误定罪。