课题基金 / 基金详情

An investigation into the acceptance and the opposition of food inspection officers and food businesses towards disclosure regimes

An investigation into the acceptance and the opposition of food inspection officers and food businesses towards disclosure regimes
食品检验官员和食品企业对披露制度的接受和反对的调查
批准号:
203552599
负责人:
Professor Dr. Norbert Hirschauer
金额:
$0.0万
依托单位国家:
德国
项目类别:
Research Grants
财政年份:
2011
资助国家:
德国
项目状态:
已结题
起止时间:
2010-12-31 至 2020-12-31

项目摘要

项目成果

Professor Dr. Norbert Hirschauer的其他基金

相似基金

相关文献

中文摘要
翻译
点击翻译按钮获取中文摘要
英文摘要
From a regulatory perspective, adverse outcomes associated with deviance represent negative externalities that are caused by the breaking of rules designed to prevent them. From a rational choice perspective, the probability of malpractice increases with the benefits for its authors. It decreases with the probability of detection and resulting losses. It also decreases with bonds to social norms that protect producers from yielding to economic temptations. The design of mechanisms that reduce behavioural risks and prevent malpractice requires an understanFding of why food businesses obey or not obey the rules. Our first-time project contributed to a better understanding of malpractice on the restaurant/retail level through a statistical analyses of food inspection results and food businesses survey data. The results show that not only economic incentives but also social and psychological factors influence compliance behaviour. Furthermore, we found evidence that the disclosure system in Berlin provides incentives that have significant potential to increase compliance. Still, there is a considerable number of opponents of disclosure systems among businesses, administrators and policy makers. The strong opposition resulted in the suspension of the disclosure pilot projects in Berlin in 2014. Therefore, new and policy relevant research question arise: What are the main factors that make certain social actors reject/support disclosure policies? And what is the set of actions available to these opponents. If we understand the reasons for rejection of the system, we can suggest measures that have the potential to increase the support of the system (e.g. informational campaigns, modified designs of disclosure schemes). We will analyse the factors that affect the attitude of two influential lobbying groups: the food businesses and the food inspectors. We will also continue our study of behavioural determinants by considering the inspectors evaluations regarding the factors and regulatory measures (including disclosure schemes) that promote business compliance and with it food safety.
期刊论文(4)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
Compliance with Food Safety Laws in Germany: Food Businesses in Berlin
遵守德国食品安全法:柏林的食品企业
DOI: 10.1111/lapo.12105
发表时间: 2018
期刊: SRPN: Politics of Food (Topic)
影响因子: --
作者: [Bavorová, Grüner, Hirschauer]
通讯作者: Hirschauer
The Smiley in North Rhine-Westphalia (Germany): which companies regret the cancellation of the transparency system?
北莱茵-威斯特法伦州的笑脸(德国):哪些公司对透明度系统的取消感到遗憾?
DOI: 10.1007/s00003-017-1108-y
发表时间: 2017
期刊: Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety
影响因子: 2.4
作者: [Grüner]
通讯作者: Grüner
DOI: 10.1108/bfj-02-2016-0061
发表时间: 2017
期刊: British Food Journal
影响因子: 3.3
作者: [Bavorová, Hirschauer]
通讯作者: Hirschauer
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.305581
发表时间: 2020
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者: []
通讯作者:
A behavioural economic analysis of compliance and non-compliance with water-protection and food-safety rules in primary production: a survey- and experiment-based study
A game-theoretic and institutional anlysis of moral hazards and social dilemmas: the case of behavioural food risks and white-collar crime in agri-food chains
Real Options: What contribution does the theory of irreversible investment under uncertainty make to our understanding of the determinants of competitiv capacity of agricultural industries?
海外基金