US Efforts to Influence Government Policies on Human Trafficking

美国努力影响政府有关人口贩运的政策

• 批准号: 1260423
• 负责人: Judith Kelley
• 金额: $ 29.97万
• 依托单位: Duke University
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 项目类别: Standard Grant
• 财政年份: 2014
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2014-07-01 至 2018-06-30
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1260423&HistoricalAwards=false
• 关键词: US; Efforts; Influence; Government; Policies

This award satisfies Division B, Title V, Sec. 543 of the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act of 2013 (P.L. 113-6, enacted on March 26, 2013).This project examines the efforts of the US government to influence countries around the world to fight human trafficking. The project's intellectual impact is to improve our understanding of diplomacy and of how the international community can encourage governments to undertake domestic reforms through different strategies such as persuasion, shaming and economic pressure. The project thus contributes to core questions about power and mechanisms of influence.The US has a strong program against trafficking in persons: every year since 2001 the US State Department has reported publically on the efforts of countries around the world to combat human trafficking. The reports themselves are similar to other State Department reports on freedom of religion or human rights, but they differ in one important respect: the issuance of a grade for each country. The State Department uses the reports and the grades to shame and praise countries and issue recommendations, and, backed by national legislation, to threaten recalcitrant states with sanctions. In each country, US embassy staff engage with officials, non-governmental and intergovernmental organizations, and encourage countries to create national anti-trafficking action plans, pass laws, or build shelters. The US also requires national authorities to provide data about their efforts, and criticizes them if they do not. After ten years, opinions of the program are mixed. This project examines the global reactions to the TIP program and its contribution to promoting some of its recommended anti-trafficking policies in countries around the world. Has the US been able to advance its preferred policies and if so, which states have been most or least responsive, what strategies have worked and which have backfired? The project will rely on multiple sources and methods. The author has gathered over 9000 documents related to diplomacy, news and organizational reports and has also built a database of about 500 relevant NGOs around the world. The research will combine quantitative analysis with content analysis of documents, extensive interviews, and case studies to trace the developments on the ground. The project will proceed at three levels. Level one seeks to explain variation in how countries react to receiving bad grades. Level two focuses on a sub-component of US efforts to push for domestic anti-trafficking laws, and will use both a global quantitative study and a detailed analysis of 26 countries for which the documentary record on the issue is particularly rich. Level three goes deeper using only 7-8 countries to analyze the effect of the entirety of US efforts in the context of other local and international actors. The broader impacts will be twofold. First is the practical policy impact: Trafficking is a human rights tragedy that destroys the lives of more than 2.4 million men, women and children every year. Because data on trafficking are still unreliable, this project cannot assess whether the current policy solutions reduce trafficking volume, but it can assess whether diplomatic efforts are succeeding in getting countries to bolster their anti-trafficking efforts and offer prescriptions for improvements. This can be relevant far beyond the specific focus of this project to other efforts to promote policies such as democracy, human rights and various political reforms. The second impact is on education: The project will involve students in teaching and research opportunities, and disseminate project findings widely through conferences, lectures, publications and, with the PI in a school of public policy, also concerted policy engagement.

该奖项符合SEC第五章B组的要求。《2013年综合和进一步继续拨款法案》(2013年3月26日颁布的第113-6号法律公告)的543条。这个项目考察了美国政府影响世界各国打击人口贩运的努力。该项目的智力影响是提高我们对外交以及国际社会如何通过说服、羞辱和经济施压等不同策略鼓励各国政府进行国内改革的理解。因此，该项目有助于解决有关权力和影响机制的核心问题。美国有一个强大的打击人口贩运计划：自2001年以来，美国国务院每年都公开报告世界各国打击人口贩运的努力。这些报告本身与国务院关于宗教自由或人权的其他报告相似，但它们在一个重要方面有所不同：为每个国家发布评级。美国国务院利用这些报告和评级来羞辱和赞扬国家，并发布建议，并在国家立法的支持下，以制裁来威胁顽固的国家。在每个国家，美国大使馆工作人员与官员、非政府组织和政府间组织接触，并鼓励各国制定国家反人口贩运行动计划，通过法律，或建立庇护所。美国还要求国家当局提供有关他们努力的数据，如果他们不提供，就批评他们。十年后，人们对该计划的看法不一。该项目审查了全球对TIP方案的反应，以及它对在世界各国推广其建议的一些反人口贩运政策的贡献。美国能够推进其偏好的政策吗？如果是的话，哪些州的反应最积极或最不积极，哪些战略奏效了，哪些产生了适得其反的效果？该项目将依赖于多种来源和方法。作者收集了9000多份与外交、新闻和组织报道有关的文件，并建立了一个由全球约500个相关非政府组织组成的数据库。这项研究将把定量分析与文献内容分析、广泛访谈和案例研究相结合，以追踪实地的发展。该项目将分三个层次进行。第一级试图解释各国对收到不好成绩时的反应差异。第二级侧重于美国推动国内反人口贩运法律努力的一个子组成部分，将使用全球量化研究和对26个国家的详细分析，这些国家在这一问题上的记录特别丰富。第三级更深入，仅使用7-8个国家来分析美国在其他当地和国际行为者背景下的整体努力的效果。更广泛的影响将是双重的。首先是实际的政策影响：人口贩运是一场人权悲剧，每年摧毁240多万男女和儿童的生命。由于关于人口贩运的数据仍然不可靠，该项目无法评估目前的政策解决方案是否减少了人口贩运，但它可以评估外交努力是否正在成功地促使各国加强打击人口贩运的努力，并提供改善的处方。这可能远远超出本项目的具体重点，与促进民主、人权和各种政治改革等政策的其他努力有关。第二个影响是对教育的影响：该项目将使学生参与教学和研究机会，并通过会议、讲座、出版物广泛传播项目成果，并与公共政策学院的国际和平研究所一道，协调一致的政策参与。