Collaborative Research: Worker Insecurity and the Institutionalization of Part-Time Work

合作研究：工人的不安全感和兼职工作的制度化

• 批准号: 1324000
• 负责人: Andrew Fullerton
• 金额: $ 10.49万
• 依托单位: Oklahoma State University
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 项目类别: Standard Grant
• 财政年份: 2013
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2013-09-15 至 2016-08-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1324000&HistoricalAwards=false
• 关键词: Collaborative; Research; Worker; Insecurity; Institutionalization

SES-1324000PI: Andrew FullertonOklahoma State UniversitySES-1324019PI: Jeffrey DixonHoly Cross CollegePart-time work is an important potential source of insecurity that workers around the world face, but it is understudied in the context of worker insecurity, partly because of the cross-national variation in the meanings and measurements of part-time work. This project examines the relationship between part-time work and several forms of perceived worker insecurity, including the perceived threat of job loss in the near future, worries about the threat of job loss, and the perceived difficulty of finding a comparable job in the labor market. Focusing on multiple levels of analysis, this project asks: Do part-time workers feel more insecure than full-time workers? Does this vary by country? At the country level, what is the relationship between the size of the part-time workforce and average levels of insecurity? Based on individual-level data from the 2005 International Social Survey Program (ISSP) Work Orientations III module linked to macro-level data, preliminary results reveal that workers in part-time jobs feel more insecure than workers in full-time jobs, all else equal. However, the size of the part-time gap in worker insecurity varies substantially across countries, and countries with higher rates of part-time work tend to have lower levels of average worker insecurity. To account for these seemingly contradictory findings, the investigators develop a model of the "institutionalization of part-time work," which refers to the creation and perpetuation of scripts and shared rules that guide decisions and actions regarding employers' use of part-time work. Using this framework, the research hypothesizes that the gap in perceived worker insecurity between part-time and full-time workers will be smallest in countries in which part-time work has been institutionalized to such a degree that: A) a substantial number of men work part-time (even if most part-time workers are women), B) part-time workers have the same legal protections and benefits as full-time workers, C) most part-time workers are employed in those positions voluntarily, and D) part-time work is not concentrated in low-wage occupations. This model will be tested with ISSP and other survey data linked to macro-level data, including a country-level dataset that will contain aggregate measures of part-time work and other labor market characteristics for more than 50 countries and several time points between 2000 and 2010.Broader ImpactsThe knowledge gained from this study about the sources of perceived worker insecurity has important implications for scholars and policy makers concerned with the consequences of part-time and other forms of non-standard work on workers' health, families, and communities. The results will also bear on debates about "flexicurity" policies in parts of Europe, which are intended to reconcile employer preferences for flexible work arrangements (such as part-time work) with employment security for workers. Furthermore, the new country-level dataset will be made available to interested scholars, teachers, and researchers to examine part-time work and other types of non-standard work. These data can also be supplemented with other macro- or micro-level data to examine other socioeconomic outcomes. Additionally, this project will involve undergraduate and graduate students who have an interest in quantitative methods of research, comparative sociology, and work and occupations, and the researchers will seek assistants who will help in each stage of this project and gain valuable research skills as a result. Finally, the principal investigators will produce several presentations and scholarly publications based on this project.

兼职工作是世界各地工人面临的不安全感的一个重要潜在来源，但在工人不安全感的背景下研究不足，部分原因是兼职工作的含义和测量的跨国差异。本研究探讨了兼职工作和几种形式的工人不安全感之间的关系，包括在不久的将来失业的威胁，对失业威胁的担忧，以及在劳动力市场上找到类似工作的困难。这个项目关注多个层面的分析，提出了一个问题：兼职工人比全职工人更不安全吗？这是否因国家而异？在国家一级，非全时劳动力的规模与平均不安全程度之间的关系是什么？根据2005年国际社会调查方案工作方向三模块中与宏观层面数据相联系的个人层面数据，初步结果显示，在其他条件相同的情况下，从事非全时工作的工人比从事全时工作的工人感到更不安全。然而，非全时工作者不安全感的差距在各国之间有很大差异，非全时工作比例较高的国家往往工人的平均不安全感较低。为了解释这些看似矛盾的调查结果，调查人员开发了一个“非全时工作制度化”的模型，这是指创建和延续脚本和共同规则，指导雇主使用非全时工作的决定和行动。利用这一框架，研究假设，在非全时工作制度化程度达到以下程度的国家，非全时工人和全时工人之间在工人不安全感方面的差距最小：A.相当多的男子从事非全时工作（即使大多数兼职工人是女性），B）兼职工人享有与全职工人相同的法律的保护和福利，C）大多数兼职工人是自愿受雇于这些职位的，D）兼职工作并不集中在低工资职业。将用ISSP和其他与宏观数据有关的调查数据来检验这一模式，包括一个国家级数据集，其中将包含部分2000年至2010年期间，50多个国家和几个时间点的时间工作和其他劳动力市场特征。更广泛的影响从这项研究中获得的关于工人不安全感来源的知识对学者和政策制定者关注兼职和其他形式的非标准工作对工人健康、家庭和社区的影响。调查结果还将影响到欧洲部分地区关于“灵活保障”政策的辩论，这些政策旨在调和雇主对灵活工作安排（如非全时工作）的偏好与工人的就业保障。此外，新的国家级数据集将提供给感兴趣的学者、教师和研究人员，以研究兼职工作和其他类型的非标准工作。这些数据还可以用其他宏观或微观层面的数据加以补充，以审查其他社会经济成果。此外，该项目将涉及对定量研究方法，比较社会学以及工作和职业感兴趣的本科生和研究生，研究人员将寻求在该项目的每个阶段提供帮助的助手，并因此获得宝贵的研究技能。最后，主要研究人员将根据本项目制作几份报告和学术出版物。