Identification of Falsifications in Survey Data
Identification of Falsifications in Survey Data
批准号:
218596777
负责人:
Professorin Dr. Natalja Menold
金额:
$0.0万
依托单位国家:
德国
项目类别:
Research Grants
财政年份:
2012
资助国家:
德国
项目状态:
已结题
起止时间:
2011-12-31 至 2015-12-31
中文摘要
在项目第一阶段的基础上,我们从三个方面扩展我们的分析。首先,考虑到了部分造假的情况,即面试官只伪造了一些面试和/或部分面试。分析了现有的方法在多大程度上仍然适用于这种情况。其次,结合心理学中的动机理论,拓展了对面试官动机的研究。在此理论背景下,提出了关于部分造假的类型和程度的假设。我们将使用一个实验来测试这些假设,并得出更多关注部分证伪的指标。第三,在存在部分证伪的情况下,确定性聚类法的使用似乎不够充分。取而代之的是,考虑了允许将一个面试者的数据描述为两个分布的混合的概率聚类方法。为了克服这些方法的数值问题,采用了优化启发式方法。此外,建模方法扩展到两个以上的组,允许根据动机或经验等因素进行不同类型的证伪。所有结果都被用来改进问卷和调查方法,以通过增强面试者的积极性和增加事后发现的机会来阻止造假。
英文摘要
Building on the first phase of the project, we extend our analysis in three aspects. First, the case of partial falsifications is taken into account, i.e. that interviewers falsify only some interviews and/or only parts of interviews. It is analyzed to what extent the existent methods are still useful in this setting. Second, the study of interviewers’ motivation is extended taking into account also theories of motivation from psychology. Based on this theoretical background, hypothesis about the type and extent of partial falsifications are derived. We will use an experiment to test these hypotheses and to derive further indicators focusing on partial falsifications. Third, in the presence of partial falsifications, the use of deterministic clustering methods does not appear adequate. Instead, probabilistic clustering methods are considered which allow describing the data for one interviewer as a mixture of two distributions. To overcome numerical problems of these methods, optimization heuristics are used. Furthermore, the modelling approach is extended to more than two clusters, allowing for different types of falsifications depending on factors such as motivation or experience. All results are used to improve questionnaires and survey methodology in order to deter falsifications by enhancing interviewers’ motivation and increasing the chance of ex post detection.
期刊论文(5)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
登录
查看更多内容
How Do Real and Falsified Data Differ? Psychology of Survey Response as a Source of Falsification Indicators in Face-to-Face Surveys
真实数据和伪造数据有何不同?
DOI:
10.1093/ijpor/edt017
发表时间:
2014
期刊:
International Journal of Public Opinion Research
影响因子:
1.8
作者:
[Menold, Kemper]
通讯作者:
Kemper
DOI:
10.3233/sji-140834
发表时间:
2014
期刊:
Statistical journal of the IAOS
影响因子:
--
作者:
[De Haas, Winker]
通讯作者:
Winker
DOI:
10.1027/1614-2241/a000078
发表时间:
2014
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
[Kemper, Menold]
通讯作者:
Menold
Interviewer effects in real and falsified interviews: Results from a large scale experiment
真实和虚假面试中的面试官效应:大规模实验的结果
DOI:
10.3233/sji-150908
发表时间:
2015
期刊:
Statistical journal of the IAOS
影响因子:
--
作者:
[Winker, Menold, Landrock]
通讯作者:
Landrock
Ensuring valid comparisons of self-reports in heterogeneous populations and marginalised groups (ENSURE)
-
批准号:427257768
-
项目类别:Research Units
-
资助金额:$0.0万
-
财政年份:2019
-
负责人:Professorin Dr. Natalja Menold
-
依托单位:
Identification of Falsifications in Survey Data
-
批准号:161902349
-
项目类别:Priority Programmes
-
资助金额:$0.0万
-
财政年份:2010
-
负责人:Professorin Dr. Natalja Menold
-
依托单位:
海外基金