Evaluation of spatial audio quality in non-standardized test environments

非标准化测试环境中的空间音频质量评估

• 批准号: 219464429
• 负责人: Professor Dr.-Ing. Karlheinz Brandenburg
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: Institut für Medientechnik
• 依托单位国家: 德国
• 项目类别: Research Grants
• 财政年份: 2012
• 资助国家: 德国
• 起止时间: 2011-12-31 至 2015-12-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/219464429?language=en
• 关键词: Evaluation; spatial; audio; quality; non

Audio quality perception is already subject of different evaluation for a long time. Especially developments in the last few years in the domain of multichannel audio theoretically enable a realistic audio reproduction, but its quality for practical applications still needs to be evaluated. Despite extensive research on spatial audio quality there are still aspects that are not yet fully understood, for example the composition of the quality parameters. Quality evaluations are generally done in standardized test environments, hereinafter referred to as laboratory. Furthermore, mainly standardized evaluation methods are used, which usually measure the basic audio quality compared to a reference signal. The unidimensional, quantitative results of these methods are only comparable and repeatable in standardized test environments. They neither take into account the multidimensionality of audio quality nor the actual context of use. Furthermore, individual quality scales of subjects are not considered and quality ratings are averaged over all subjects. Another critical aspect is that the reference signal is not always known or defined. Recent research that tries to understand the multidimensionality of audio quality perception uses descriptive evaluation methods. These methods allow an individual quality rating often without a reference and participants own descriptions. Different studies already showed that timbre and spaciousness are two very important aspects of spatial audio quality. However, there is still some disagreement on the type and weighting of the quality elements and their influence on the overall quality. Except some evaluations in concert halls, the context of use it not evaluated in existing evaluations so far. Though, the subjective audio quality very much depends on the room acoustics and cannot be transferred simply to other rooms. In this project valid and repeatable evaluation and analysis methods will be developed to better understand human quality perception and to rate the perceived spatial audio quality. The goal of the project is to analyze the dimensions of audio quality perception as well as to evaluate the influence of the test environment on quality perception. The results will show the weighting and influence of the different quality parameters dependent on the context of use. They can be used directly for the development of objective quality evaluation methods and to improve coding algorithms.

长期以来，音频质量感知一直是不同评价的主题。特别是最近几年多声道音频领域的发展，理论上能够实现逼真的音频再现，但其实际应用的质量仍然需要评估。尽管对空间音频质量进行了广泛的研究，但仍然存在尚未完全理解的方面，例如质量参数的组成。质量评估通常在标准化的测试环境中进行，以下称为实验室。此外，主要使用标准化的评估方法，其通常测量与参考信号相比的基本音频质量。这些方法的一维定量结果仅在标准化测试环境中具有可比性和可重复性。它们既不考虑音频质量的多维性，也不考虑实际使用环境。此外，不考虑受试者的个人质量量表，质量评级是所有受试者的平均值。另一个关键方面是参考信号并不总是已知或定义的。最近的研究，试图了解音频质量感知的多维度使用描述性评估方法。这些方法允许个人质量评级，通常没有参考和参与者自己的描述。不同的研究已经表明，音色和空间感是空间音频质量的两个非常重要的方面。然而，在质量要素的类型和权重及其对总体质量的影响方面仍存在一些分歧。除了在音乐霍尔斯的一些评价，使用的情况下，它没有评估在现有的评估。但是，主观音频质量在很大程度上取决于房间声学，不能简单地转移到其他房间。在该项目中，将开发有效且可重复的评估和分析方法，以更好地了解人类质量感知并对感知的空间音频质量进行评级。该项目的目标是分析音频质量感知的维度以及评估测试环境对质量感知的影响。结果将显示取决于使用环境的不同质量参数的权重和影响。它们可以直接用于开发客观质量评价方法和改进编码算法。