WORKSHOP: Ethics in Experimental Political Science- May 2016

实验政治学中对伦理问题的认识正在增长。本次研讨会汇集了政治学学者和研究诚信学者，以解决在伦理设计，审查和实验研究的实施的关键需求。与以往的政治科学讨论不同，本次研讨会既包括从事实验研究的政治科学家，也包括人类受试者研究伦理方面的专家，以制定最佳实践建议，以保护人类受试者、研究人员、政治科学领域、高等教育机构和公众对科学的投资。实验政治学中对伦理问题的认识正在增长。本次研讨会汇集了政治学学者和研究诚信学者，以解决在伦理设计，审查和实验研究的实施的关键需求。与过去的政治科学讨论不同，这次研讨会既包括从事实验研究的政治科学家，也包括人类受试者研究的伦理学专家。特邀演讲者和讨论者将在小组和圆桌会议上讨论以下问题领域：(1)同意和欺骗性研究中的特殊问题；(2)管理偶然发现、附带损害和社区损害；(3)与社区及业界伙伴合作，进行负责任的研究；(4)加强社区对国际资助研究的审查和同意能力；(5)在评估风险、危害和剥削时，确定描述性和规范性基线；(6)量化心理危害；(7)使用预先存在的数据集时的特殊注意事项。

General SummaryAwareness of ethical issues in experimental political science is growing. This workshop brings together political science scholars and research integrity scholars to address critical needs in the ethical design, review, and implementation of experimental research. Unlike past discussions within political science, this workshop includes both political scientists engaged in experimental research and experts in the ethics of human-subjects research to develop best practice recommendations that will protect human subjects, researchers, the field of political science, institutions of higher learning, and the public's investment in science.Technical SummaryAwareness of ethical issues in experimental political science is growing. This workshop brings together political science scholars and research integrity scholars to address critical needs in the ethical design, review, and implementation of experimental research. Unlike past discussions within political science, this workshop includes both political scientists engaged in experimental research and experts in the ethics of human-subjects research. Invited speakers and discussants will address in both panel and round table form the following issue areas: (1) special issues in consent and deceptive research; (2) managing incidental findings and collateral and community harms; (3) working with community and industry partners to conduct responsible research; (4) enhancing community capacity for review and consent in internationally sponsored research; (5) identifying descriptive and normative baselines when assessing risk, harm, and exploitation; (6) quantifying psychological harms; and (7) special concerns when using pre-existing data sets.