权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Grenzüberschreitende Arbeitnehmerüberlassung. Die Konstitutierung von Märkten und transnationaler Regulierung im interregionalen Vergleich

跨境临时就业。

基本信息

批准号：
227795227
负责人：
Professorin Karen A. Shire, Ph.D.
金额：
--
依托单位：
Fachgebiet Gesellschaftsvergleich und die Gesellschaft Japans
依托单位国家：
德国
项目类别：
Research Grants
财政年份：
2012
资助国家：
德国
起止时间：
2011-12-31 至 2015-12-31
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/227795227?language=en
关键词：
Grenz berschreitende Arbeitnehmer berlassung.Die

项目摘要

The proposed research examines the creation of cross-border labor markets for temporary agency work. The focus is on the role of private labor market intermediaries and the emerging governance of cross-border temporary placements in two world regions – the European Union and East Asia. Theoretically the research draws together theories of transnational organizations and the economic sociology of market-making. Both perspectives foreground the role of actors and focus on the negotiated order of institution-building to regulate labor markets. The leading research questions concern how and why markets for temporary labor are taking on transnational dimensions, and whether these markets can and will be governed by transnational institutions, or remain outside the scope of current international and national regulations of temporary agency work. In order to generalize beyond the EU as the typical unit of reference for many transnationalization studies, the research design is inter-regionally comparative, building on the language-based regional competence of the research team in East Asian studies. Private firm organizations (transnational temporary staffing firms) and interest communities (employer and labor representatives) form the units of analysis, while the interplay of national and (supranational) regional activities constitute the levels of analysis in the proposed research design. The state of research on the transnationalization of temporary staffing indicates that in both Europe and East Asia the integration of transformation countries into regional economies has intensified the extension of agency placements across national borders: in East Asia, to and from China, and in Europe, from Hungary, the Czech Republic and especially Poland. A number of variations and some surprising similarities between Europe and East Asia are hypothesized. The first addresses regional differences in the transnationalization of the staffing industry, with European global players developing a transnational identity, while transnationalization in East Asia has developed through the diffusion of the Japanese model of staffing to other East Asian contexts. A second regional difference involves the national embeddedness of labor, which is particularly strong in Europe, and may be hindering the emergence of regulations for cross-border staffing placements. The weaker role of organized labor in representing temporary agency workers in East Asia has largely excluded labor from intra-regional labor market-making, but the emergence of social movement type labor unions may be creating a stronger transnational community for labor representation in East Asia in its place. Finally, given signs of regulatory fragmentation in the EU, new governance forms may be the most effective form of regulating cross-border labor markets in both regional contexts.

拟议的研究探讨了为临时机构工作建立跨境劳动力市场的问题。重点是私人劳动力市场中介机构的作用，以及世界两个地区-欧盟和东亚-跨境临时安置的新兴治理。在理论上，这项研究汇集了跨国组织理论和市场决策的经济社会学。这两种观点都突出了行动者的作用，并侧重于通过谈判建立制度以规范劳动力市场的秩序。主要的研究问题涉及临时劳动力市场是如何以及为什么正在采取跨国层面，以及这些市场是否可以和将由跨国机构管理，或保持在目前的国际和国家的临时机构工作的规定范围之外。为了超越欧盟作为许多跨国化研究的典型参考单位，研究设计是区域间的比较，建立在东亚研究团队的语言为基础的区域能力。私营企业组织（跨国临时员工公司）和利益团体（雇主和劳工代表）形成的分析单位，而国家和（超国家）区域活动的相互作用构成了拟议的研究设计的分析层次。关于临时工作人员跨国化的研究状况表明，在欧洲和东亚，转型国家融入区域经济，加剧了机构安置跨越国界的扩展：在东亚，从中国到中国，在欧洲，从匈牙利、捷克共和国，特别是波兰。欧洲和东亚之间的一些变化和一些令人惊讶的相似之处被假设。第一个解决区域差异的跨国化的人员配置行业，与欧洲的全球球员发展的跨国身份，而跨国化在东亚已经通过日本模式的人员配置到其他东亚环境的扩散。第二个地区差异涉及劳动力的国家嵌入性，这在欧洲尤其强烈，可能会阻碍跨境人员安置法规的出现。在东亚，有组织的劳工在代表临时代理工人方面的作用较弱，在很大程度上将劳工排除在区域内劳动力市场的形成之外，但社会运动型工会的出现可能会在东亚创造一个更强大的跨国劳工代表社区。最后，鉴于欧盟监管分散的迹象，新的治理形式可能是在这两个区域背景下监管跨境劳动力市场的最有效形式。