权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Grenzüberschreitende Arbeitnehmerüberlassung. Die Konstitutierung von Märkten und transnationaler Regulierung im interregionalen Vergleich

跨境临时就业。

基本信息

批准号：
227795227
负责人：
Professorin Karen A. Shire, Ph.D.
金额：
--
依托单位：
Fachgebiet Gesellschaftsvergleich und die Gesellschaft Japans
依托单位国家：
德国
项目类别：
Research Grants
财政年份：
2012
资助国家：
德国
起止时间：
2011-12-31 至 2015-12-31
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/227795227?language=en
关键词：
Grenz berschreitende Arbeitnehmer berlassung.Die

项目摘要

The proposed research examines the creation of cross-border labor markets for temporary agency work. The focus is on the role of private labor market intermediaries and the emerging governance of cross-border temporary placements in two world regions – the European Union and East Asia. Theoretically the research draws together theories of transnational organizations and the economic sociology of market-making. Both perspectives foreground the role of actors and focus on the negotiated order of institution-building to regulate labor markets. The leading research questions concern how and why markets for temporary labor are taking on transnational dimensions, and whether these markets can and will be governed by transnational institutions, or remain outside the scope of current international and national regulations of temporary agency work. In order to generalize beyond the EU as the typical unit of reference for many transnationalization studies, the research design is inter-regionally comparative, building on the language-based regional competence of the research team in East Asian studies. Private firm organizations (transnational temporary staffing firms) and interest communities (employer and labor representatives) form the units of analysis, while the interplay of national and (supranational) regional activities constitute the levels of analysis in the proposed research design. The state of research on the transnationalization of temporary staffing indicates that in both Europe and East Asia the integration of transformation countries into regional economies has intensified the extension of agency placements across national borders: in East Asia, to and from China, and in Europe, from Hungary, the Czech Republic and especially Poland. A number of variations and some surprising similarities between Europe and East Asia are hypothesized. The first addresses regional differences in the transnationalization of the staffing industry, with European global players developing a transnational identity, while transnationalization in East Asia has developed through the diffusion of the Japanese model of staffing to other East Asian contexts. A second regional difference involves the national embeddedness of labor, which is particularly strong in Europe, and may be hindering the emergence of regulations for cross-border staffing placements. The weaker role of organized labor in representing temporary agency workers in East Asia has largely excluded labor from intra-regional labor market-making, but the emergence of social movement type labor unions may be creating a stronger transnational community for labor representation in East Asia in its place. Finally, given signs of regulatory fragmentation in the EU, new governance forms may be the most effective form of regulating cross-border labor markets in both regional contexts.

拟议的研究探讨了临时代理工作跨境劳动力市场的创建。重点是私营劳动力市场中介机构的作用以及欧盟和东亚这两个世界地区新兴的跨境临时安置治理。理论上，该研究综合了跨国组织理论和市场制造的经济社会学理论。这两种观点都强调了行为者的作用，并重点关注通过谈判达成的制度建设秩序，以规范劳动力市场。主要的研究问题涉及临时劳动力市场如何以及为何呈现跨国规模，以及这些市场是否能够并且将会受到跨国机构的管理，或者仍然处于当前国际和国家临时代理工作法规的范围之外。为了将欧盟作为许多跨国化研究的典型参考单位进行推广，研究设计是跨区域比较的，建立在东亚研究研究团队基于语言的区域能力的基础上。私营公司组织（跨国临时工公司）和利益共同体（雇主和劳工代表）构成了分析单位，而国家和（超国家）区域活动的相互作用构成了拟议研究设计中的分析层次。关于临时人员跨国化的研究状况表明，在欧洲和东亚，转型国家融入区域经济加剧了机构配置的跨国界延伸：在东亚，往返于中国；在欧洲，往返于匈牙利、捷克共和国，尤其是波兰。欧洲和东亚之间存在许多差异和一些令人惊讶的相似之处。第一个问题解决了人力资源行业跨国化的区域差异，欧洲全球参与者发展了跨国身份，而东亚的跨国化则是通过日本人力资源模式向其他东亚环境的传播而发展起来的。第二个区域差异涉及劳动力的国家嵌入性，这在欧洲尤其强烈，可能会阻碍跨境人员配置法规的出现。东亚地区有组织的劳工在代表临时代理工人方面的作用较弱，这在很大程度上将劳动力排除在区域内劳动力市场之外，但社会运动型工会的出现可能正在为东亚的劳工代表创建一个更强大的跨国社区。最后，鉴于欧盟监管碎片化的迹象，新的治理形式可能是在这两个区域背景下监管跨境劳动力市场的最有效形式。