Infusing Argumentation into the SCALE-UP Environment
将论证融入 SCALE-UP 环境中
基本信息
- 批准号:1712201
- 负责人:
- 金额:$ 29.98万
- 依托单位:
- 依托单位国家:美国
- 项目类别:Standard Grant
- 财政年份:2017
- 资助国家:美国
- 起止时间:2017-08-15 至 2023-07-31
- 项目状态:已结题
- 来源:
- 关键词:
项目摘要
Scientific argumentation and decision-making abilities are critical for our college graduates to become active participants in the 21st century workforce. Research has shown that by learning the skills of scientific argumentation, students can become more effective problem solvers. There have been few efforts to help students in large enrollment gateway undergraduate science classes develop these skills. The project will transform an introductory physics course for future engineers into a format that integrates scientific argumentation. The main objective of this project is to develop strategies to help students to engage in scientific argumentation when they work in groups to solve problems and complete labs. Additionally, the project will prepare faculty and teaching assistants to learn strategies that help students develop argumentation skills. The project will assess the impact of these changes on student learning, attitudes, and retention. Prior research has shown that argumentative tasks can enhance conceptual understanding, epistemic beliefs and problem solving skills. This project will develop strategies to foster scientific argumentation in novel contexts including context-rich problems and contrasting cases. Prompts supporting both written and oral argumentation will be adapted and refined to create design principles for argumentative tasks. These strategies will be first implemented in the SCALE-UP format and then be adapted to courses in other formats. A two-phase concurrent mixed methods approach will be utilized to assess the impact of these interventions on students' conceptual understanding, epistemological beliefs, problem solving and argumentative skills, attitudes, and retention. The investigators anticipate higher gains in students' conceptual understanding, problem solving skills, and attitudes, as well as a drop in DFW rates.
科学论证和决策能力对于我们的大学毕业生成为 21 世纪劳动力的积极参与者至关重要。研究表明,通过学习科学论证的技巧,学生可以成为更有效的问题解决者。很少有人努力帮助大招生入门本科科学课程的学生发展这些技能。该项目将把面向未来工程师的物理入门课程转变为整合科学论证的形式。该项目的主要目标是制定策略,帮助学生在小组解决问题和完成实验时进行科学论证。此外,该项目还将帮助教师和助教学习帮助学生培养论证技能的策略。该项目将评估这些变化对学生学习、态度和保留率的影响。先前的研究表明,论证任务可以增强概念理解、认知信念和解决问题的能力。该项目将制定策略,在新的背景下促进科学论证,包括背景丰富的问题和对比案例。支持书面和口头论证的提示将进行调整和完善,以创建论证任务的设计原则。这些策略将首先以 SCALE-UP 形式实施,然后适应其他形式的课程。将采用两阶段并行混合方法来评估这些干预措施对学生概念理解、认识论信念、问题解决和论证技能、态度和记忆力的影响。研究人员预计学生的概念理解、解决问题的能力和态度将得到提高,同时 DFW 率也会下降。
项目成果
期刊论文数量(7)
专著数量(0)
科研奖励数量(0)
会议论文数量(0)
专利数量(0)
Argumentation with Contrasting Cases : Facilitation of Deep Structure Learning
对比案例论证:促进深度结构学习
- DOI:
- 发表时间:2017
- 期刊:
- 影响因子:0
- 作者:Rebello, Carina M;Beardmore, David;Towle, Bryce
- 通讯作者:Towle, Bryce
Scaffolding Evidence-Based Reasoning in a Technology Supported Engineering Design Activity
在技术支持的工程设计活动中搭建基于证据的推理
- DOI:
- 发表时间:2019
- 期刊:
- 影响因子:0
- 作者:Rebello, C.M.
- 通讯作者:Rebello, C.M.
Using natural language processing to predict student problem solving performance
使用自然语言处理来预测学生解决问题的表现
- DOI:10.1119/perc.2021.pr.munsell
- 发表时间:2021
- 期刊:
- 影响因子:0
- 作者:Munsell, Jeremy;Rebello, N. Sanjay;Rebello, Carina M.
- 通讯作者:Rebello, Carina M.
Using a Hybrid of Argumentation and Problem Solving Prompts to Facilitate Undergraduates' Problem Solving Performance and Confidence
结合使用论证和解决问题提示来提高本科生解决问题的表现和信心
- DOI:
- 发表时间:2019
- 期刊:
- 影响因子:0
- 作者:Rebello, C.M.
- 通讯作者:Rebello, C.M.
Impact of Argumentation Scaffolds in Contrasting Designs Tasks on Elementary Pre-Service Teachers’ Use of Science Ideas in Engineering Design
对比设计任务中论证支架对小学职前教师的影响——在工程设计中运用科学思想
- DOI:
- 发表时间:2017
- 期刊:
- 影响因子:0
- 作者:Uruena, Yuri B.;Rebello, Carina M;Dasgupta, Chandan;Magana, A J;Rebello, N. Sanjay
- 通讯作者:Rebello, N. Sanjay
{{
item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
- DOI:
{{ item.doi }} - 发表时间:
{{ item.publish_year }} - 期刊:
- 影响因子:{{ item.factor }}
- 作者:
{{ item.authors }} - 通讯作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ journalArticles.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ monograph.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ sciAawards.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ conferencePapers.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ patent.updateTime }}
Carina Rebello其他文献
Carina Rebello的其他文献
{{
item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
- DOI:
{{ item.doi }} - 发表时间:
{{ item.publish_year }} - 期刊:
- 影响因子:{{ item.factor }}
- 作者:
{{ item.authors }} - 通讯作者:
{{ item.author }}
{{ truncateString('Carina Rebello', 18)}}的其他基金
Developing Students' Problem-Solving Skills in Introductory Undergraduate Physics Courses
在本科物理入门课程中培养学生解决问题的能力
- 批准号:
2111138 - 财政年份:2022
- 资助金额:
$ 29.98万 - 项目类别:
Standard Grant
Improving the Problem Solving Skills of Engineering Undergraduate Students by Infusing Engineering Design in Introductory Physics
将工程设计融入物理入门提高工程本科生解决问题的能力
- 批准号:
2021389 - 财政年份:2020
- 资助金额:
$ 29.98万 - 项目类别:
Standard Grant
相似海外基金
Preparing Science Teachers To Engage Multilingual Learners in Scientific Argumentation Through Mixed-Reality Simulations
让科学教师做好准备,通过混合现实模拟让多语言学习者参与科学论证
- 批准号:
2321205 - 财政年份:2024
- 资助金额:
$ 29.98万 - 项目类别:
Standard Grant
Methodology of Argument Construction in Medieval Indian Argumentation Theory
中世纪印度论证理论的论证构建方法论
- 批准号:
23K18636 - 财政年份:2023
- 资助金额:
$ 29.98万 - 项目类别:
Grant-in-Aid for Research Activity Start-up
Argumentation in scholarly biomedical literature: Computational theory, implementation, and supporting deep learning software
生物医学学术文献中的争论:计算理论、实现和支持深度学习软件
- 批准号:
RGPIN-2020-06463 - 财政年份:2022
- 资助金额:
$ 29.98万 - 项目类别:
Discovery Grants Program - Individual
Computational Modeling of Argumentation Understanding
论证理解的计算建模
- 批准号:
22H00524 - 财政年份:2022
- 资助金额:
$ 29.98万 - 项目类别:
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A)
Collaborative Research: Conference: Promoting Cross-Disciplinary Dialogue Between Experts in Argumentation and Innovative Technologies
协作研究:会议:促进论证与创新技术专家之间的跨学科对话
- 批准号:
2230224 - 财政年份:2022
- 资助金额:
$ 29.98万 - 项目类别:
Standard Grant
Collaborative Research: Conference: Promoting Cross-Disciplinary Dialogue Between Experts in Argumentation and Innovative Technologies
协作研究:会议:促进论证与创新技术专家之间的跨学科对话
- 批准号:
2230225 - 财政年份:2022
- 资助金额:
$ 29.98万 - 项目类别:
Standard Grant
An automated, fully auditable company revenue analysis generator, using natural language processing and argumentation theory to replace a currently manual process
自动化、完全可审计的公司收入分析生成器,使用自然语言处理和论证理论来取代当前的手动流程
- 批准号:
10017815 - 财政年份:2022
- 资助金额:
$ 29.98万 - 项目类别:
Collaborative R&D
Trajectories of Conflict: The Dynamics of Argumentation in the UN Security Council
冲突轨迹:联合国安理会的争论动态
- 批准号:
AH/V003305/1 - 财政年份:2021
- 资助金额:
$ 29.98万 - 项目类别:
Research Grant
Argumentation in scholarly biomedical literature: Computational theory, implementation, and supporting deep learning software
生物医学学术文献中的争论:计算理论、实现和支持深度学习软件
- 批准号:
RGPIN-2020-06463 - 财政年份:2021
- 资助金额:
$ 29.98万 - 项目类别:
Discovery Grants Program - Individual
How direct teaching of metadiscursive nouns and rhetorical patterns affects L2 argumentation essays
元话语名词和修辞模式的直接教学如何影响二语论证论文
- 批准号:
21K13001 - 财政年份:2021
- 资助金额:
$ 29.98万 - 项目类别:
Grant-in-Aid for Early-Career Scientists














{{item.name}}会员




