课题基金 / 基金详情

Trajectories of Conflict: The Dynamics of Argumentation in the UN Security Council

Trajectories of Conflict: The Dynamics of Argumentation in the UN Security Council
冲突轨迹:联合国安理会的争论动态
批准号:
AH/V003305/1
负责人:
Chris Reed
金额:
$36.13万
依托单位:
依托单位国家:
英国
项目类别:
Research Grant
财政年份:
2021
资助国家:
英国
项目状态:
已结题
起止时间:
2021 至 --

项目摘要

项目成果

Chris Reed的其他基金

相似基金

相关文献

中文摘要
翻译
点击翻译按钮获取中文摘要
英文摘要
Conflict is inherently dynamic. Positions morph, contexts change, factions and allegiances realign, and even when everything else appears to be in stasis, there is change in the language used to express conflict - in the framings and nuances and emotions. Our aim is to understand this dynamism and to test that understanding at scale.We will develop novel, integrative theory and then apply that theory both to understand ways in which conflict is presented linguistically and also how it evolves, not just in terms of its underlying positions but also in its presentation. We eschew domain- or theme-specific conflict, and instead site our study within the foremost venue for conflict of the highest level and greatest import: the UN Security Council. Rather than focus on a single issue or region or period of the Security Council, our goal is to work with the entirety of its activity in which significant conflict is presented: a dataset of almost one million words. Across the 25 years of almost daily meetings, our techniques will offer insight both to geopolitical analysts and to the general public into how conflicts at the Council emerge and evolve, combining analysis of local discourse features such as vagueness and emotionality with structural features such as justification-giving and patterns of reasoning, and finally considering how positions in conflict are framed. Across all of these aspects there are interacting dynamics, which our theory of conflict trajectories aims to understand so that it will become possible for the first time to map the language of conflict simultaneously in great detail and at very large scale.This is the first time that the techniques of big data have driven the study of the language of conflict. Though we will bring such computational techniques to bear, our focus is on delivering the foundational theory, the analytical techniques and the dataset resources that can subsequently underpin future computational research and indeed into applied innovation delivering value for scholars of political science, international relations and as well as for professionals working in diplomacy and geopolitical analysis and ultimately the general public.
期刊论文(3)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
The waltonian foundations of argument technology
沃尔顿论论证技术的基础
DOI: --
发表时间: 2021
期刊: Journal of Applied Logics
影响因子: --
作者: [Reed C.]
通讯作者: Reed C.
Disagreement space in argument analysis
论证分析中的分歧空间
DOI: --
发表时间: 2022
期刊: 1st Workshop on Perspectivist Approaches to Disagreement in NLP, NLPerspectives 2022 as part of Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, LREC 2022 Workshop
影响因子: --
作者: [Hautli-Janisz A.]
通讯作者: Hautli-Janisz A.
IfCoLoG Journal of Logics and their Applications
IfCoLoG 逻辑学杂志及其应用
DOI: --
发表时间: 2021
期刊: The Waltonian Foundations of Argument Technology
影响因子: --
作者: [Reed C]
通讯作者: Reed C
Argument Mining
  • 批准号:
    EP/N014871/1
  • 项目类别:
    Research Grant
  • 资助金额:
    $86.66万
  • 财政年份:
    2016
  • 负责人:
    Chris Reed
  • 依托单位:
Dialectical Argumentation Machines
  • 批准号:
    EP/G060347/1
  • 项目类别:
    Research Grant
  • 资助金额:
    $71.49万
  • 财政年份:
    2009
  • 负责人:
    Chris Reed
  • 依托单位:
海外基金