RAPID: Research+Practice Collaboratory: Tools and Methods for Forming Research-Practice Partnerships

华盛顿大学作为研究+实践合作实验室的牵头组织，将举办三个研讨会，为构建新的CSforAll征求（NSF 17-525）所需的研究-实践伙伴关系（RPPs）提供技术支持。 实践研讨会以2016年9月举行的简短版本为蓝本，旨在1.激发对RPP在支持可持续的、以公平为导向的CS教育方面的新努力的价值的兴趣，2.提高对稳健RPPs形成和维持的认识; 3.支持团队开发适当的RPP研究问题和项目设计，从而使实践和理论都受益。研讨会将于2017年1月在三个城市举行：亚特兰大、洛杉矶和芝加哥。 潜在的PI将适用于3-4人的团队。 团队应包括一名K-12教育工作者，负责课程和教学，专业发展/认证或评估，一名K-12教育工作者，负责在建筑物或教室层面实施变革，以及在相关情况下，一名社区利益相关者，该利益相关者是州或地区一级公平的有效倡导者。 如果团队已经确定了一名教育研究员，该研究员也应该参加。将邀请更多的教育研究人员与这些小组合作。 将生成一份简短的报告，总结感兴趣的领域，可能的紧张局势，以及新发现的机会，在研究人员和从业人员之间建立更强的联系，可以推进以公平为导向的CSforAll努力。

The University of Washington, as the lead organization of the Research + Practice Collaboratory, will run three workshops to provide technical support for constructing the kinds of research-practice partnerships (RPPs) that are required by the new CSforAll Solicitation (NSF 17-525). The hands-on workshops, modeled on a shorter version held in September of 2016, are designed to1. Generate interest in the value of RPPs in supporting new efforts in sustainable, equity-oriented CS education, 2. Advance understanding on the formation and maintenance of robust RPPs, and 3. Support teams in the development of appropriate RPP research questions and project designs that could result in benefits to both practice and theory. The workshops will be held in January 2017 in three cities: Atlanta, Los Angeles, and Chicago. Prospective PIs will apply in teams of 3-4 people. Teams should include a K-12 educator with responsibility for curriculum and instruction, professional development/certification, or assessment, a K-12 educator who will be responsible for implementing changes at the building or classroom level, and, if relevant, a community stakeholder that is an effective advocate for equity at the state or district level. If the team has already identified an education researcher, that researcher should attend as well. Additional education researchers will be invited to work with the teams. A brief report will be generated summarizing the areas of interest, possible tensions, and newly identified opportunities with respect to creating stronger connections between researchers and practitioners that can advance the equity-oriented CSforAll effort.