INFEWS/T3 RCN: EngageINFEWS - A Research Coordination Network for Community and Stakeholder Engagement Critical to Food, Energy, and Water Systems

INFEWS/T3 RCN：EngageINFEWS - 对食品、能源和水系统至关重要的社区和利益相关者参与的研究协调网络

• 批准号: 1856059
• 负责人: Andrew Kliskey
• 金额: $ 74.96万
• 依托单位: Regents of the University of Idaho
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 项目类别: Continuing Grant
• 财政年份: 2019
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2019-08-15 至 2025-07-31
• 项目状态: 未结题
• 来源: https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1856059&HistoricalAwards=false
• 关键词: INFEWS; T3; RCN; EngageINFEWS; Research

Scientific efforts that focus on innovations at the nexus of food, energy, and water systems (INFEWS) necessarily require that scientists work closely with non-scientists to produce beneficial, appropriate, and useable sustainability outcomes. Scientific approaches that involve communities, industry, tribal organizations, non-governmental organizations, government agencies, and other stakeholders have been called "community-engaged research" or "stakeholder engagement." The EngageINFEWS research coordination network (RCN) brings together a diverse group of scientists and non-scientists to develop and document a cohesive set of best practices for community engaged research at the intersection of food, energy, and water systems (FEWS) science. EngageINFEWS aims to advance knowledge of community-engaged research and to help food, energy, and water systems (FEWS) science serve the needs of various stakeholders interested in FEWS. Results of this RCN will serve to ensure that human communities are equipped with the best possible tools to respond to both chronic and acute social and environmental changes impacting food, energy, and water systems (FEWS). Community- and stakeholder-engaged research seeks to create a productive and collaborative space for scholarship that involves non-scientists in scientific work. The framework developed by the EngageINFEWS research collaborative network (RCN) considers how principles of collaborative governance may be useful in developing and understanding best practices for working both in and with communities to improve FEWS research. The overarching hypothesis of this RCN is that appropriate approaches to community and stakeholder engagement are determined by the context of specific FEWS projects and differ based on each context. EngageINFEWS is informed by two framing questions: 1) How are community and stakeholder engagement best integrated into interdisciplinary FEWS projects? 2) How can INFEWS teams conduct productive community and stakeholder engagement to support research and educational activities? The overarching goal of the EngageINFEWS RCN is to develop a set of current and best practices across FEWS efforts. This goal is being achieved using a framework co-created by EngageINFEWS network members that is iterative, interdisciplinary, reflexive, and evaluative. This includes creating a long term, sustainable effort which can work with and alongside existing FEWS initiatives to ensure that research is responsive to the needs, concerns, and priorities of the people and institutions that are most affected by FEW system dynamics, vulnerabilities, and change.This award reflects NSF's statutory mission and has been deemed worthy of support through evaluation using the Foundation's intellectual merit and broader impacts review criteria.

关注粮食、能源和水系统（INFEWS）创新的科学努力必然要求科学家与非科学家密切合作，以产生有益的、适当的和可用的可持续性成果。涉及社区、工业、部落组织、非政府组织、政府机构和其他利益相关者的科学方法被称为“社区参与的研究”或“利益相关者参与”。“EngageINFEWS研究协调网络（RCN）汇集了不同的科学家和非科学家群体，以开发和记录一套有凝聚力的最佳实践，用于食品，能源和水系统（FEWS）科学交叉领域的社区参与研究。EngageINFEWS旨在促进社区参与研究的知识，并帮助食品，能源和水系统（FEWS）科学服务于对FEWS感兴趣的各种利益相关者的需求。 该RCN的结果将有助于确保人类社区配备最佳工具，以应对影响粮食、能源和水系统的慢性和急性社会和环境变化。社区和学术界参与的研究旨在为学术创造一个富有成效和协作的空间，让非科学家参与科学工作。由EngageINFEWS研究合作网络（RCN）开发的框架考虑了合作治理的原则如何有助于开发和理解在社区内和与社区合作以改善FEWS研究的最佳实践。本RCN的总体假设是，社区和利益相关者参与的适当方法由特定FEWS项目的背景决定，并根据每个背景而有所不同。EngageINFEWS由两个框架问题提供信息：1）社区和利益相关者的参与如何最好地融入跨学科FEWS项目？2)INFEWS团队如何进行富有成效的社区和利益相关者参与，以支持研究和教育活动？EngageINFEWS RCN的首要目标是在FEWS工作中制定一套当前的最佳实践。这一目标正在通过EngageINFEWS网络成员共同创建的框架来实现，该框架具有迭代性，跨学科性，反思性和评估性。这包括创建一个长期的，可持续的努力，可以与现有的FEWS倡议一起工作，以确保研究能够响应受FEWS系统动态，脆弱性，该奖项反映了NSF的法定使命，并被认为是值得通过使用基金会的智力价值和更广泛的评估支持影响审查标准。

项目成果

Stakeholder-Driven Policies and Scenarios of Land System Change and Environmental Impacts: A Case Study of Owyhee County, Idaho, United States

• DOI: 10.3390/su16010467
• 发表时间: 2024-01-01
• 期刊: SUSTAINABILITY
• 影响因子: 3.9
• 作者: Huang，Li;Cronan，Daniel;Carlucci，Fabio
• 通讯作者: Carlucci，Fabio

Energy policy for energy sovereignty: Can policy tools enhance energy sovereignty?

能源主权的能源政策：政策工具能否增强能源主权？

• DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2020.05.056
• 发表时间: 2020
• 期刊: Solar Energy
• 影响因子: 6.7
• 作者: Schelly, Chelsea;Bessette, Douglas;Brosemer, Kathleen;Gagnon, Valoree;Arola, Kristin L.;Fiss, Andrew;Pearce, Joshua M.;Halvorsen, Kathleen E.
• 通讯作者: Halvorsen, Kathleen E.

Understanding Socio-Technological Systems Change through an Indigenous Community-Based Participatory Framework

通过基于土著社区的参与框架了解社会技术系统的变化

• DOI: 10.3390/su13042257
• 发表时间: 2021
• 期刊: Sustainability
• 影响因子: 3.9
• 作者: Schaefer, Marie;Schmitt Olabisi, Laura;Arola, Kristin;Poitra, Christie M.;Matz, Elise;Seigel, Marika;Schelly, Chelsea;Adesanya, Adewale;Bessette, Doug
• 通讯作者: Bessette, Doug

Improving solar development policy and planning through stakeholder engagement: The Long Island Solar Roadmap Project

通过利益相关者参与改善太阳能发展政策和规划：长岛太阳能路线图项目

• DOI: 10.1016/j.tej.2019.106678
• 发表时间: 2019
• 期刊: The Electricity Journal
• 作者: Schelly, Chelsea;Price, Jessica;Delach, Aimee;Thapaliya, Rupak;Leu, Karen
• 通讯作者: Leu, Karen

Contrasting stakeholder and scientist conceptual models of food-energy-water systems: a case study in Magic Valley, Southern Idaho

对比利益相关者和科学家的食物-能源-水系统概念模型：爱达荷州南部魔谷的案例研究

• DOI: 10.18174/sesmo.2020a16312
• 发表时间: 2019
• 期刊: Socio-Environmental Systems Modelling
• 作者: Villamor, Grace B.;Griffith, David L.;Kliskey, Andrew;Alessa, Lilian
• 通讯作者: Alessa, Lilian