Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Award: The Fit between Producers and Consumers in Traditional Society

哈佛大学的马修·利布曼博士和埃里克·约翰逊将研究一个扩张中的国家的核心生产与其殖民边界上的消费之间的关系。最近的考古工作揭示了人类使用“外国制造”物品来塑造有意义的社会身份的许多方式。然而，这种对身份的关注往往会淡化生产和消费之间重要的经济相互依赖关系。研究人员将分析公元1750年至1900年期间新泽西贝壳珠制造中心的考古遗迹。在这些地方，欧裔美国人生产贝壳珠子，出口给大平原上的美洲原住民消费者。在不断扩张的美国国家边界上的相互作用如何影响新泽西的工业化？哪些因素导致向土著消费者生产和销售产品的成功和失败？原住民消费者如何使用泽西制造的珠子来实现他们自己的社会和政治目标？今天，美国制造业的大部分依赖于居住在国外的消费者的口味。推动工业的力量--以及工人的成功或奋斗--往往与生产者无法直接理解的遥远的政治和文化因素联系在一起。通过调查国家政策对早期美国工业家和原住民民族命运的影响，这项研究为经济，国家政策和国际事务之间的关系提供了关键的见解。该项目进行的考古发掘将为学生提供培训考古学科学方法的机会。研究人员将通过当地历史学会和新泽西州立博物馆与社区利益相关者进行学术交流，以展示美国当地工业如何与大平原上的土著文化、经济和冲突密切相关。研究人员将研究生产和消费之间随时间的变化，以确定影响美国工业兴衰的因素。贝壳珠子在北美已经生产了数千年，但到了美国革命时期，北方新泽西的爱尔兰和荷兰定居者成为毛皮贸易珠子的主要出口商。结合对现有博物馆藏品的分析，新泽西的发掘将以“原始工业”和“工业”贝壳珠制造场所为目标，以碎片、废物、珠坯、工具和成品珠的形式收集考古数据。这些将与历史账目、工厂分类账和毛皮贸易记录一起进行沿着审查，以跟踪“工业化”的要素，如效率、技术、标准化和产出规模。考古学，历史，人种学和肖像数据将被用来跟踪广泛的区域趋势，在整个世纪的贝壳珠原住民使用。不同的部落、性别和年龄是如何佩戴珠子的？在什么情况下，为了什么目的？该奖项反映了NSF的法定使命，并被认为是值得通过使用基金会的知识价值和更广泛的影响审查标准进行评估的支持。

Dr. Matthew Liebmann and Eric Johnson of Harvard University will investigate the relationship between production in the core of an expanding state and consumption on its colonial borders. Recent work in archaeology reveals the many ways that humans use "foreign-made" objects to forge meaningful social identities. Yet this focus on identity tends to downplay important economic interdependencies between production and consumption. Researchers will analyze the archaeological remains of shell bead manufacturing centers New Jersey between 1750 and 1900 CE. At these sites, Euro-Americans produced shell beads for export to Native American consumers on the Great Plains. How did interactions on the borders of an expanding American state impact industrialization in New Jersey? What factors led to the successes and failures of making and selling products to indigenous consumers? And how did Native consumers use Jersey-made beads to achieve their own social and political goals? Today, much of the American manufacturing sector relies on the tastes of consumers who live outside the country's boundaries. The forces that drive industry - and the success or struggles of workers - are often tied to distant political and cultural factors beyond the immediate understanding of producers. By investigating the effects of state policies on the fortunes of both early American industrialists and Native nations, this research offers key insights into the relationship between the economy, state policy, and international affairs. The archaeological excavations conducted by this project will provide opportunities for student training in scientific methods of archaeology. Researchers will engage publically with community stakeholders through local historical societies and the New Jersey State Museum in an effort to show how a local American industry was intimately tied to indigenous cultures, economies, and conflicts on the Great Plains.Researchers will examine changes over time between production and consumption in order to determine the factors that influenced the rise and fall of an American industry. Shell beads have been made in North America for thousands of years, but by the American Revolution, Irish and Dutch settlers in northern New Jersey became the major exporters of beads for the fur trade. Combined with analysis of existing museum collections, excavations in New Jersey will target "proto-industrial" and "industrial" shell bead manufacturing sites to gather archaeological data in the form of debris, waste, bead blanks, tools, and finished beads. These will be examined along with historical accounts, factory ledgers, and fur trade records to track elements of "industrialization" such as efficiencies, technologies, standardization, and scale of output. Archaeological, historical, ethnographic, and portraiture data will be used to track broad regional trends in Native uses of shell beads throughout the 19th century. How were beads worn by different tribes, genders, and ages? In what contexts, and to what end?This award reflects NSF's statutory mission and has been deemed worthy of support through evaluation using the Foundation's intellectual merit and broader impacts review criteria.