权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Collaborative Research: Research Initiation: RUI: Is it Rocket Science or Brain Science? Developing an Approach to Measuring Engineering Intuition

合作研究：研究启动：RUI：是火箭科学还是脑科学？

基本信息

批准号：
1927250
负责人：
Elif Miskioglu
金额：
$ 13.76万
依托单位：
Bucknell University
依托单位国家：
美国
项目类别：
Standard Grant
财政年份：
2019
资助国家：
美国
起止时间：
2019-10-01 至 2022-09-30
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1927250&HistoricalAwards=false
关键词：
Collaborative Research Initiation RUI Rocket

项目摘要

Engineers are tasked with designing, developing, and building solutions to complex problems. By nature, their decisions can have critical consequences, such as in the space shuttle Challenger disaster and the Boeing 737 Max 8 faulty sensor incident. In both of these events, the vehicle was cleared to fly by an engineer. Avoiding such engineering mistakes requires not only technical knowledge but also the ability to rapidly assess whether a solution is feasible and appropriate. The skill of engineering intuition (often referred to as a "gut feeling") becomes increasingly important as engineers become further removed from the problem-solving process. Today's engineers rely on sophisticated software tools where the assumptions and computations leading to a solution are hidden from the user. They must be able to evaluate whether a computer output is reasonable or ridiculous. This intuition is thought to be developed through professional experience but could also be acquired in the classroom as part of the formal development of engineering expertise. No clear definition of intuition or methods for identifying an individual's level of intuition exist despite the well-documented importance of intuition in developing expertise. The gap in knowledge and resources around engineering intuition limits educators as there is no clear path on how to develop engineering intuition in the classroom. A definition and means of measuring engineering intuition is needed to equip engineering educators with the tools to create classroom activities that promote intuition development as currently engineers must rely on variable experiences and opportunities to gain intuition. Furthermore, building intuition has the potential to foster student confidence, which disproportionately affects the persistence and resilience of underrepresented minorities in engineering majors and careers. The link between intuition, experience, and access to opportunity can empower students to persist in engineering careers and narrow the existing opportunity gaps in engineering.This project initially defines engineering intuition as the ability to assess solution feasibility and predict outcomes or options within an engineering scenario. The project will begin by interviewing practicing expert engineers to determine the alignment of their definition of intuition with ours and identify the constructs that encompass engineering intuition. This study will use a mixed-methods approach to provide qualitative insights into expert engineering intuition that can be leveraged to create a quantitative instrument with acceptable validity and reliability evidence to support further use by engineering scholars and educators. Grounded in frameworks for expertise development such as the Dreyfus model and Fuzz-Trace Theory, the project aims to answer the following research questions: (1) What are practicing professional engineers' perceptions of discipline-specific intuition and its use in the workplace?; (2) Where does intuition manifest in expert engineering decision-making and problem-solving processes?; (3) How does the motivation and identity of practicing professional engineers relate to discipline-specific intuition?; and (4) What would an instrument designed to validly and reliably measure engineering intuition look like? The proposed research bridges the theory-to-practice gap to develop engineering intuition by defining intuition and its relationship to other constructs (e.g., motivation) and developing a procedure for measuring and identifying how discipline-specific intuition is developed.This award reflects NSF's statutory mission and has been deemed worthy of support through evaluation using the Foundation's intellectual merit and broader impacts review criteria.

工程师的任务是设计，开发和构建复杂问题的解决方案。从本质上讲，他们的决定可能会产生严重的后果，例如挑战者号航天飞机灾难和波音737 Max 8故障传感器事件。在这两次事件中，飞行器都是由一名工程师批准飞行的。避免此类工程错误不仅需要技术知识，还需要快速评估解决方案是否可行和适当的能力。随着工程师越来越远离解决问题的过程，工程直觉（通常被称为“直觉”）的技能变得越来越重要。今天的工程师依赖于复杂的软件工具，其中导致解决方案的假设和计算对用户是隐藏的。他们必须能够评估计算机输出是否合理或荒谬。这种直觉被认为是通过专业经验开发的，但也可以在课堂上获得，作为工程专业知识正式发展的一部分。尽管直觉在发展专业知识方面的重要性有充分的证据证明，但没有明确的直觉定义或识别个人直觉水平的方法。围绕工程直觉的知识和资源的差距限制了教育工作者，因为如何在课堂上培养工程直觉没有明确的路径。测量工程直觉的定义和手段，需要装备工程教育工作者的工具，以创建课堂活动，促进直觉的发展，目前工程师必须依靠可变的经验和机会来获得直觉。此外，建立直觉有可能培养学生的信心，这不成比例地影响了工程专业和职业中代表性不足的少数民族的持久性和弹性。直觉，经验和机会之间的联系可以使学生坚持工程职业生涯，缩小工程领域现有的机会差距。该项目最初将工程直觉定义为评估解决方案可行性和预测工程场景中的结果或选项的能力。该项目将开始采访实践专家工程师，以确定他们的直觉定义与我们的一致性，并确定包含工程直觉的结构。本研究将使用混合方法的方法，提供定性的见解，专家工程直觉，可以利用创建一个定量工具，可接受的有效性和可靠性证据，以支持工程学者和教育工作者进一步使用。本项目以德雷福斯模型和模糊轨迹理论等专业知识发展框架为基础，旨在回答以下研究问题：（1）实践专业工程师对特定学科直觉的看法及其在工作场所的使用？(2)直觉在专家工程决策和问题解决过程中表现在哪里？(3)实践专业工程师的动机和身份与专业直觉有什么关系？以及（4）设计用于有效和可靠地测量工程直觉的仪器是什么样子的？拟议的研究弥合了理论与实践的差距，通过定义直觉及其与其他结构（例如，该奖项反映了NSF的法定使命，并通过使用基金会的知识价值和更广泛的影响审查标准进行评估，被认为值得支持。

项目成果

期刊论文数量（5）

专著数量（0）

科研奖励数量（0）

会议论文数量（0）

专利数量（0）

Practicing Engineers’ Definition of Their Expertise: Emergent Themes and Frequency by Gender Identity and Role Change into Management

执业工程师的专业知识定义：按性别认同和管理角色转变划分的新兴主题和频率

DOI：
发表时间：
2021
期刊：
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference
影响因子：
0
作者：
Bolton, C.;Miskioğlu, E.;Martin, K. M.;Aaron, C.;Carberry, A. R.
通讯作者：
Carberry, A. R.

Predicting and Evaluating Engineering Problem Solving (PEEPS): Instrument Development

预测和评估工程问题解决 (PEEPS)：仪器开发

DOI：
发表时间：
2021
期刊：
Research in Engineering Education Symposium & Australasian Association for Engineering Education Conference
影响因子：
0
作者：
Martin, Kaela M.;Miskioglu, Elif;Noble, Cooper;McIntyre, Allison;Bolton, Caroline;Carberry, Adam R.
通讯作者：
Carberry, Adam R.

Is it Rocket Science or Brain Science? Developing an Approach to Measure Engineering Intuition

是火箭科学还是脑科学？

DOI：
发表时间：
2021
期刊：
2021 ASEE Annual Conference
影响因子：
0
作者：
Miskioglu, E.;Martin, K. M.;Carberry, A. R.;Bolton, C.;Aaron, C.
通讯作者：
Aaron, C.

Nurses, Managers, and Engineers – Oh My! Disciplinary Perceptions of Intuition and Its Role in Expertise Development

护士、经理和工程师 — 天哪！

DOI：
10.1109/fie44824.2020.9274026
发表时间：
2020
期刊：
2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE
影响因子：
0
作者：
Aaron, Caitlyn;Miskioglu, Elif;Martin, Kaela M.;Shannon, Brooke;Carberry, Adam
通讯作者：
Carberry, Adam

Work In Progress: Experts’ Perceptions of Engineering Intuition

正在进行的工作：专家对工程直觉的看法