Narrative Style of the Tour of Hell in the Acts of Philip

把地狱之旅包括在《腓力行传》的一个手稿中，而不是另一个手稿中，提出了一个问题：这种被禁止的杜撰写作，很可能是5-6世纪边缘社区的产物，如何在圣经中锚定自己，在关于来世的教义讨论中，在地狱的体裁之旅中，以及在其他所谓的使徒伪经行为中。这个项目的重要性体现在它揭示了经典作品和非经典作品之间更紧密的叙事关系，并展示了在ActPhil的情况下，这个外国语料库是如何在整个作品中不可或缺的，即使没有它，作品也同样发挥着作用。在这项原创研究中，计划持续三年，根据之前的但有限的文献，将使用三个层次的风格来分析ActPhil 1中的地狱之旅的叙事风格：1.识别或刻画；2.技术或方法，如何写作和如何阅读；3.质量和语言语域。这本带有强烈道德规范的文本将与其明确的来源进行比较，以说明官方教会忏悔和流行宗教文学之间、正典和非正典之间以及跨越犹太、基督教和伊斯兰著作的宗教间分歧的思想的连续性和间断性。该项目将基于典故和来源中的常见材料来确定ActPhil的作者是如何去工作的，将地狱之旅融入他更伟大的作品中，以形成一个合理的整体。将对这两份著名的手稿进行比较，一份包含巡演，另一份不包含，以及明显的编辑活动，带来了两个明显不同但有道理的阅读。在《菲利普使徒行传》的节录活动中，读者群体(主流教会)的态度如何帮助形成了关于受人尊敬的使徒菲利普传教活动的最终文本，带有强烈的道义基调，这一点是显而易见的。今天，我们也发现，社区的期望正在塑造宗教话语，尽管可能比古代更加多样化。具有讽刺意味的是，这位ActPhil的作者将他的作品植根于拒绝他的宗教和文学传统。

The inclusion of the tour of hell in one of the manuscripts of the Acts of Philip and not another raises the question how this banned apocryphal writing, most probably a product of a fringe community from the fifth-sixth century, anchors itself in the Holy Scriptures, in doctrinal discussions on the after-life, the genre tours of hell, and in the other so-called apocryphal acts of the apostles. The importance of this project is seen in its exposing the closer narrative relations between the canonical and non-canonical writings, and shows how, in the case of ActPhil, this foreign corpus is integral in the whole work, even as the work functions equally well without it. In this piece of original research, which is planned to run for three years, in light of the preceding but limited literature, the narrative style of the Tour of Hell in ActPhil 1 will be analysed using a three-tier approach to style: 1. identification or characterisation; 2 technique or method, how composed and how read; 3. quality and language register. This text with its strong moral codes will be compared to its clear sources, to illustrate the continuity and discontinuity of thought between the official church confessions and the popular religious literature, between the canonical and the non-canonical, and across the inter-religious divide of Jewish, Christian and Islamic writings. The project will base its orientation on the allusions and common material in the sources to ascertain how the author of ActPhil went to work, incorporating the tour of hell into his greater work to form a sensible whole. A comparison will be drawn between the two noted manuscripts, the one containing the tour and the other not, and the clear redactional activity that has brought about two clearly different but justified readings. Within the redaction activity of the Acts of Philip it is clear how the attitudes of the reading community (the main stream church) helped shape the final text on the missionary activities of the revered Apostle Philip with a strong moralistic undertone. Today too, we find community expectations shaping religious discourse, though probably more diversely than in antiquity. Ironically, the author of ActPhil has anchored his work in a religious and literary tradition that has rejected him.