Die Congregatio Victorina des Pariser Augustinerchorherren Johannes von Toulouse (+ 1659).Kritische Edition des Textes samt einer Studie zum Mittelalterbild eines frühneuzeitlichen Historikers

维克托编年史的图卢兹约翰(1590-1659)似乎知道，直到我们的时代，只有法国历史的专家，特别是巴黎历史以及圣维克多修道院的历史。这位生活在整个17世纪的教士不仅在他的家修道院里承担了一系列的责任。此外，图卢兹的约翰留下了重要的史学著作集。在完成这个项目的第一部分，也就是维克多里纳诺斯特拉的约翰的评论版，并在开始编辑他的《维克托里纳会议》之后，我们打算，在我们正在申请的研究项目的第二部分期间，也完成这个版本的图卢兹的第二部早期工作。一旦完成了《维克托里纳会议》的版本，我们想要对我们在这个项目内编辑的托洛萨努斯的作品进行实质性的历史研究。我们主要想要坚持的问题是，在我们可以从他的著作中推断出的情况下，他对中世纪的概念和观点是什么。除了本笃会修道士让·马比隆(+1713)，图卢兹的约翰，一位佳能的常客，被认为是17世纪欧洲历史学的领军人物之一。然而，这一估值将在我们的版本和计划出版的专著的基础上成为可能。

The Victorine chronicler John of Toulouse (1590-1659) seems to be known, up to our times, only to specialists of the history of France, particularly of the history of Paris as well as that of the abbey of Saint-Victor. This canon who lived throughout the 17th century, did not only occupy a series of responsabilities within his home abbey. Furthermore, John of Toulouse left an important corpus of historiographical works. While finishing the first part of this project, that is to say the critical edition of Johns Commentaria rerum pene omnium in domo nostra Victorina, and after starting the edition of his Congregatio Victorina, we intend, during the second part of the research project which for we are applying hereby, to complete also this edition of Johns of Toulouse second early work.Once having completed the edition of the Congregatio Victorina, we want to dedicate a substantial historical study to John of Tolosanus works which we have edited within this project. Mainly we want to insist on the question of what may have been his concept of and his view on the Middle Ages insofar we can deduce this from his writings. Besides the Benedictine monk Jean Mabillon (+ 1713) John of Toulouse, a Canon regular, is supposed to be considered one of the leading figures of European historiography during the 17th century. This valuation, however, will become possible on the basis of our editions and through the planned monograph.