Autocracy or the Negotiation of Power? Prince Leopold III. Friedrich Franz of Anhalt-Dessau (1758-1817) and his practice of government
Autocracy or the Negotiation of Power? Prince Leopold III. Friedrich Franz of Anhalt-Dessau (1758-1817) and his practice of government
批准号:
264490880
负责人:
Professor Dr. Andreas Pecar
金额:
$0.0万
依托单位:
依托单位国家:
德国
项目类别:
Research Grants
财政年份:
2014
资助国家:
德国
项目状态:
已结题
起止时间:
2013-12-31 至 2019-12-31
中文摘要
利奥波德三世亲王弗里德里希·弗朗茨(1758-1817)以他所谓的“花园王国”沃利茨而闻名。在历史研究中,他被认为是启蒙运动和十八世纪末重大政治改革的倡导者。他作为一个开明的改革者的声誉主要是由温克尔曼,歌德或巴塞多等当代作家的陈述创造的。然而,他的政治统治的日常实践还没有任何详细的研究。因此,他的政府实践是这个研究项目的一部分。弗朗茨王子的“Kabinettsprotokolle”是一个独特的来源,可以深入了解他的政府方式。它们包含了所有向统治者提出的请愿以及他的回应和决定(约105.000条目),从而打开了一个专制统治者在七年战争和拿破仑帝国崩溃之间的时间的治理实践的详细洞察。研究项目应该分析“Kabinettsprotokolle”这是第一次,应该使我们能够重新考虑利奥波德·弗里德里希·弗朗茨作为其领土的开明改革者的观点。他的治理实践可以被理解为他本人、他的官员和他的臣民之间的一种权力谈判。调查的一部分是将安哈尔特-德绍的统治实践与神圣罗马帝国的其他领土进行比较,以确定相当典型和特殊的谈判权力要素。经过两年半的工作,王子的决策和回应比任何其他关于神圣罗马帝国德国领土请愿的调查都要多。然而,对“Kabinettsprotokolle”的调查以及对决定和反应的编目花费的时间比我们第一次申请时预期的要多。如果我们将获得延长一年的资金,我们可以完成弗朗茨王子的决定和回应的编目,我们可以在一本准备印刷的专著中介绍调查结果。
英文摘要
Prince Leopold III Friedrich Franz (1758-1817) is particularly famous for his so called “garden kingdom” of Wörlitz. In historical research he is known as an advocate of enlightenment and of substantial political reform at the end of the eighteenth century. His reputation as an enlightened reformer was mainly created by statements of contemporary authors like Winckelmann, Goethe or Basedow. The daily practice of his political rule, however, was not yet part of any detailed research. His practice of government is therefore part of this research project. The “Kabinettsprotokolle” of prince Franz are a unique source of getting deep insights in his specific way of government. They contain all petitions addressed to the ruler and his responses and decisions (approximately 105.000 entries) and therefore open a detailed insight in the governing practice of an autocrat ruler in the time between the Seven-Years-War and the collapse of the Napoleonic Empire.The research project should analyze the “Kabinettsprotokolle” for the first time and should enable us to reconsider the view of Leopold Friedrich Franz as an enlightened reformer of his territory. His governmental practice could be understood as a kind of negotiation of power between himself, his office-holders and his subjects. It will be part of the investigation to compare the ruling practice within Anhalt-Dessau with other territories of the Holy Roman Empire to identify rather typical as well as particular elements of negotiating power.After two and a half year of work more decesions and responses of the Prince are yet registered than in any other investigation about petitioning in German territories of the Holy Roman Empire. The investigation of the “Kabinettsprotokolle“ and the cataloguing of the decisions and responses has been more time spending, however, than expected at the time of our first application. If we will get a prolongation of funding for a further year we could complete the cataloguing of the decisions and responses of Prince Franz and we could present the results of the investigation in a monograph ready for print.
期刊论文(0)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
Text recycling in England during the 17th century– The transfer of ideas and debates in the English Civil War and the republic (1638-1661)
-
批准号:401648696
-
项目类别:Research Grants
-
资助金额:$0.0万
-
财政年份:2018
-
负责人:Professor Dr. Andreas Pecar
-
依托单位:
The university policy of Brandenburg-Prussia in the early stages of the University of Halle (1688-1740)
-
批准号:265579832
-
项目类别:Research Grants
-
资助金额:$0.0万
-
财政年份:2014
-
负责人:Professor Dr. Andreas Pecar
-
依托单位:
Frühe Neuzeit
-
批准号:158293816
-
项目类别:Heisenberg Fellowships
-
资助金额:$0.0万
-
财政年份:2010
-
负责人:Professor Dr. Andreas Pecar
-
依托单位:
海外基金