Evolution, Content, Functions, Effectiveness, and Enforcement of the Pan-European General Principles of Good Administration of the Council of Europe

欧洲委员会泛欧善政总原则的演变、内容、职能、有效性和执行

• 批准号: 274964159
• 负责人: Professor Dr. Ulrich Stelkens
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: Deutsches Forschungsinstitut für öffentliche Verwaltung Speyer (FÖV)
• 依托单位国家: 德国
• 项目类别: Research Grants
• 资助国家: 德国
• 项目状态: 未结题
• 来源: https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/274964159?language=en
• 关键词: Evolution; Content; Functions; Effectiveness; Enforcement

The project aims to explore the evolution, the content, the functions, the effectiveness and the possibilities of enforcing the pan-European principles of good administration. These are expressed in the rich trove of international conventions of the Council of Europe (CoE), recommendations of the Committee of Ministers of the CoE, resolutions of its other various bodies (such as the Venice Commission) and the case law of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). These sources often refer to and build upon each other. They from a ‘coherent whole’, specifying as a ‘package’ concrete legal requirements for the administrative law of the CoE Member States in order to legitimize administrative action and to ensure the respect of the rule of law and individual rights by the administration.‘Phase 1’ of the project, completed in 2020, took stock of the sources of the pan-European principles of good administration, identified their range and the topics they cover and analysed their harmonizing effect and its limits for the administrative law of the CoE Member States and, thus, their effectiveness within these legal orders. This was done with the help of experts from 28 CoE Member States. A state practice was identified according to which these principles, as a ‘package’, concretise the founding values of the CoE as mentioned in Article 3 of the Statute of the CoE (SCoE). Thus, these principles are binding upon the CoE Member States as regional international law. Their development is the result of the CoE Member States' common historical experience with regard to the requirements of a ‘good’ administrative law. However, as a ‘package’, these principles leave a wide margin of appreciation to the CoE Member States as to how and to what extent these principles are to be implemented into the national legal system. In particular, they do not lead to the harmonisation of the (considerable) differences in the "administrative legal mindsets" of the CoE Member States.Building on this, the current ‘phase 2’ of the project aims to explain the content and function of the different pan-European general principles of good administration, topic by topic, from the perspective of different European administrative legal cultures and ‘illustrated’ with material from the case law of the ECtHR, the reports of the CoE institutions as well as national and Union law sources. This presentation can provide both a point of reference for comparative administrative law and background information for examining whether and to what extent the concrete ‘configuration’ of national administrative law respects the limits of Article 3 SCoE. Furthermore, the project will analyse whether the pan-European general legal principles of good administration ‘as a package’ are also an expression of general principles of Union law and whether and by what means the European Union (EU) can enforce and promote their observance both vis-à-vis EU Member States and its Associated European Partner States.

该项目旨在探索执行泛欧良好管理原则的演变、内容、功能、有效性和可能性。这些内容体现在欧洲委员会（CoE）丰富的国际公约、欧洲委员会部长委员会的建议、其其他各个机构（例如威尼斯委员会）的决议以及欧洲人权法院（ECtHR）的判例法中。这些来源通常相互引用和构建。它们来自一个“连贯的整体”，具体规定了欧洲委员会成员国行政法的“一揽子”具体法律要求，以使行政行为合法化，并确保行政部门尊重法治和个人权利。该项目的“第一阶段”于 2020 年完成，盘点了泛欧良好行政原则的来源，确定了其范围和涵盖的主题，并分析了其协调效果及其局限性。 欧洲委员会成员国的行政法，以及它们在这些法律命令中的有效性。这是在来自 28 个 CoE 成员国的专家的帮助下完成的。根据国家实践，这些原则作为一个“一揽子计划”，具体化了《CoE 规约》(SCoE) 第 3 条中提到的 CoE 的基本价值观。因此，这些原则作为区域国际法对欧洲委员会成员国具有约束力。它们的发展是欧洲委员会成员国关于“良好”行政法要求的共同历史经验的结果。然而，作为一个“一揽子计划”，这些原则为欧洲委员会成员国在如何以及在多大程度上将这些原则落实到国家法律体系中留下了很大的余地。特别是，它们不会导致欧洲委员会成员国“行政法律思维方式”（相当大的）差异的协调。 在此基础上，该项目当前的“第二阶段”旨在从不同欧洲行政法律文化的角度逐个主题地解释不同泛欧良好行政一般原则的内容和功能，并以欧洲人权法院判例法、欧洲人权委员会报告中的材料进行“说明” 机构以及国家和联邦法律来源。本报告既可以为比较行政法提供参考，也可以为审查国家行政法的具体“配置”是否以及在多大程度上尊重《SCoE》第3条的限制提供背景信息。此外，该项目将分析泛欧洲良好管理的一般法律原则“作为一个整体”是否也是欧盟法律一般原则的表达，以及欧盟（EU）是否以及通过什么方式可以强制执行和促进对欧盟成员国及其欧洲伙伴国的遵守。