Procedural Law Theory - An inquiry into the different approaches to analyse legal rules of preocedure

程序法理论——对分析关注法律规则的不同方法的探究

• 批准号: 282333498
• 负责人: Professor Dr. Philipp Reimer
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: Lehrstuhl für Öffentliches Recht mit Schwerpunkt Verwaltungsrecht
• 依托单位国家: 德国
• 项目类别: Publication Grants
• 财政年份: 2015
• 资助国家: 德国
• 起止时间: 2014-12-31 至 2015-12-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/282333498?language=en
• 关键词: Procedural; Law; Theory; inquiry; into

(1) The book falls into two parts, the first of which deals with philosophy of science as it relates to the study of procedural law. It analyses what different research questions can be pursued in this regard. Besides (procedural-)legal dogmatics, which can be defined as the study of law from the perspective of courts and other practical lawyers with a view to applying legal rules to individual cases, other research questions are also possible, and indeed to be found in academia. For these other questions, the term "Procedural Law Theory" (Verfahrenstheorie) is coined. Those questions within Procedural Law Theory that aim at legal norms rather than at empirical facts are described here as a distinguishable field of study, to be called "juridical Procedural Law Theory". These questions deserve additional studying. It is Juridical Theory when norms are put into contexts and interpreted as to their meaning; that way, Juridical Theory arrives at horizons of meaning and valuations that legal dogmatics can neither perceive nor discuss as it does not look beyond the applicative dimension of norms. Within the study of procedural law, therefore, Juridical Theory can function as a discipline of reflection as well as a discipline-relay because it provides opportunities to connect to related but distinct academic fields. This concept can help answer the much-discussed question if, and to what extent, interdisciplinarity is possible in legal scholarship. (2) The second part of the book dives into the substance of Juridical Procedural Law Theory and attempts to chart the issues that any non-dogmatical approach to procedural norms might want to study. This attempt does not directly pick up the traditional theoretical concepts describing procedural rule-sets as a whole (like "principles of procedure" [Verfahrensmaximen], "purposes of procedure"); rather, the charting follows the different aspects of procedure that such rule-sets would normally be about. The proceeding bodies (such as courts) and their internal structure, the sequence of events within a procedure, and the role of participants therein are the three main topics addressed here.Within these three fields, the potential of juridical Procedural Law Theory as a discipline of reflection and as a discipline-relay is exemplified by a plurality of issues normally regulated by procedural law. Here it can be specifically noted that procedural-law requirements for the actual decision-making (e.g., with a juridical or non-juridical standard; with or without discretion) are closely connected to central concepts of legal theory. With another example, oral hearings with their typical imagery and symbolism (like the strict arrangement of seating in a courtroom, the gowns, the formalised speech) can be related to interpretations they have been given by cultural studies.

(1) 本书分为两部分，第一部分涉及与程序法研究相关的科学哲学。它分析了在这方面可以追求哪些不同的研究问题。除了（程序）法律教义学（可以定义为从法院和其他实践律师的角度对法律进行研究，以期将法律规则应用于个案）之外，其他研究问题也是可能的，而且确实可以在学术界找到。对于这些其他问题，“程序法理论”（Verfahrenstheorie）这个术语被创造出来。程序法理论中那些针对法律规范而不是经验事实的问题在这里被描述为一个独特的研究领域，被称为“司法程序法理论”。这些问题值得进一步研究。当规范被置于上下文中并解释其含义时，这就是司法理论；这样，司法理论就达到了法律教义学既无法感知也无法讨论的意义和评价视野，因为它没有超越规范的应用维度。因此，在程序法研究中，司法理论可以充当一门反思学科和学科接力，因为它提供了与相关但不同的学术领域联系的机会。这个概念可以帮助回答人们广泛讨论的问题：在法律学术中跨学科性是否以及在何种程度上是可能的。 (2) 本书的第二部分深入探讨了司法程序法理论的实质内容，并试图列出任何非教条性的程序规范方法可能想要研究的问题。这种尝试并没有直接采用描述整个程序规则集的传统理论概念（例如“程序原则”[Verfahrensmaximen]、“程序目的”）；相反，图表遵循了此类规则集通常涉及的程序的不同方面。程序机构（例如法院）及其内部结构、程序中事件的顺序以及参与者在其中的作用是本文讨论的三个主要主题。在这三个领域中，司法程序法理论作为反思学科和学科接力的潜力通过通常由程序法规范的多元化问题得到了例证。这里可以特别指出的是，程序法对实际决策的要求（例如，具有司法或非司法标准；有或没有自由裁量权）与法学理论的中心概念密切相关。再举一个例子，口头听证会的典型意象和象征意义（如法庭上严格的座位安排、礼服、正式的演讲）可以与文化研究给出的解释相关。