Coordination Funds

受到第一个项目阶段结果的鼓舞，在今后三年中，期刊文学研究股愿意继续调查定期出版形式，以此作为文学传媒史的试验田。基本材料--语文方法不仅构成一种方法论，而且是把握研究股目标的一种综合理论方法。定期出版物，其广谱是在>期刊<的一般概念下集合在一起的，它产生以特定方式存在的文本形式，并产生特定的使用方式。到目前为止，在该项目中进行的研究表明，进一步区分>书籍<和>报纸<的两极，并在其复杂的自我定位和归属中考虑每个单独的案例是多么重要。正是在这一背景下，研究股将其调查期延长至漫长的19世纪之后。通过拓宽视角，我们希望能够掌握期刊是如何作为一种媒介不断构成的。最初，它是一种参考媒体；然后，从19世纪末开始，它越来越多地被视为与竞争的大众媒体(电影、广播和电视)有关。调查期的历史延长还旨在通过使期刊类材料以及其中所反映的媒体星座多样化，从而获得系统性的利益。最重要的媒介差异问题是，期刊媒介是如何在与其他媒介的对比关系和模仿关系中构成的。将进一步研究第一阶段采用的期刊文献研究中的基本关键区别。我们将继续处理这些区别，但我们将以第二个三个区别来补充，这三个区别允许媒体形式和接受历史文化的更大差异。除了期刊-媒体/媒体星座的基本区别外，期刊-文学接收的时间和空间坐标将被更仔细地审查。“市场/转移”的区分瞄准了期刊文化的空间性。一方面，期刊出现在一个有别于其他地方但又与其他地方有交流的地方。另一方面，期刊本身被理解为一个市场，来自不同媒体的各种杂文在这里争夺关注。用“短暂/永久”的区分来分析期刊文化的时代性。通过与时间的流逝捆绑在一起，期刊可以被显著地定义；但它也提出了重复、在选集或书籍中重复使用、以及存档的问题，必须与20世纪的广播媒体相抗衡。

Encouraged by the results of the first project phase, during the next three years, the Research Unit »Journal Literature« would like to continue their investigation into periodic forms of publication as a test field for a literary-media history. The underlying material-philological approach does not merely constitute a methodology but is, moreover, a comprehensive theoretical way of grasping the object of the Research Unit. Periodic forms of publication, whose broad spectrum is assembled under the general concept of ›journal‹, produce textual forms which are extant in specific ways and give rise to specific modes of use. The research carried out so far in the project has shown how vital it is to further differentiate between the poles of ›book‹ and ›newspaper‹ and to consider each individual case in its complex self-positionings and ascriptions. It is against this background that the Research Unit is extending its investigation period beyond the ›long 19th century‹. By broadening the perspective, we hope to be able to grasp how ›the journal‹ is continuously constituted as a medium. Initially, it is a medium of reference; and then, from the end of the 19th century onwards, it is to be seen increasingly in relation to competing mass media (film, radio, and television). The historical extension of the period of investigation also aims at obtaining systematic benefits, by diversifying the journal-type material, as well as the media constellations that are reflected in it. The overriding media-differential question is how journal-mediality gets constituted in contrastive but also in imitative relation to other media. Basic key distinctions in the study of journal-literature employed in the first phase will be pursued further. We will continue working with these distinctions, but we will supplement them with a second triad of distinctions which allow for a greater differentiation of media formats and of historical cultures of reception. In addition to the fundamental distinction of ›journal-mediality/media constellations‹, the temporal and the spatial coordinates of journal-literary reception will be more closely examined. The ›market/transfer‹ distinction targets the spatiality of journal culture. On the one hand journals appear at a place that is distinguished from but stands in an exchange with other places. On the other hand, the journal itself is understood as a marketplace in which miscellaneous coming from various media competes for attention. The temporality of journal culture is analysed using the distinction ›ephemerality/permanence‹. The journal can be strikingly defined via its tie to the fleeting passage of time; but it also raises the question of repetition, of re-use in anthologies or books, and of archiving, and has to be positioned against broadcast media of the 20th century.