Territorialization from below? Belongings and state building, Leipzig 1485-1806

自下而上的领土化？

• 批准号: 322898684
• 负责人: Professorin Dr. Birgit Emich
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: Lehrstuhl für Geschichte der Frühen Neuzeit
• 依托单位国家: 德国
• 项目类别: Research Grants
• 财政年份: 2016
• 资助国家: 德国
• 起止时间: 2015-12-31 至 2022-12-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/322898684?language=en
• 关键词: Territorialization; below; Belongings; state; building

The nation state is deemed to be modernitys classic paradigm of order: state and nation are conceptually imagined as belonging together; the (implicit) assumption is that citizenship and the principle of territoriality came to be congruent. However, current research and sociopolitical debates both demonstrate that this national territorial conception of belonging reaches its limit: transnational and supranational entities as well as nonterritorially organized belongings replace territorial concepts of belonging or transform them. Therefore, the nation state paradigm can no longer claim extensive validity. This begs the question what might come after the nation state. At the same time, there is a growing interest in the era before the nation state that is, in its formation during the premodern age and its alternatives and variants. This is where the proposed project fits in. Inspired and informed by current processes of dissolution, it focuses on the paradigms formation, or to be more precise, on the connection between belonging and territorialization in the early modern era. Based on the example of the city of Leipzig over the period from 1485 to 1806, the goal is to map the interconnectedness and coexistence of multi tied belongings, their various spatial rang and their historicity. In a first step it will be asked which spaces were created and defined by the various key stakeholders (sovereign, urban, ecclesiastical, and academic) in early modern Leipzig. The second step involves asking for the transmission belts between this normative determination and the anchoring of these specifications in the townspeoples everyday life. On the basis of maps, cityscapes, and other symbolic representations, as well as city council and ceremonial records, it will be examined how and which differing spaces were visualized as well as which practices and rituals were used for the production of a mental map, that is for anchoring the authorities spatial arrangements in the minds of the urban dwellers. In a third step, the focus shifts towards the humans that move and interact within these urban spaces. Interrogation records and supplications in which the protagonists locate themselves spatially provide ample information of how they construed their own spaces and to what extent the authorities specifications were relevant in this process. As these configurations of spatial belongings change over the course of the early modern era, the project addresses this issue repeatedly in order to shed light on the highly relevant connection between territorialization, state building and belonging from a historical perspective. At the same time, the project introduces the facet of territorialization from below, which has hardly been considered until now, to the classic narrative of state building.

民族国家被认为是现代秩序的经典范式：国家和民族在概念上被想象为属于一起；（隐含的）假设是公民身份和领土原则是一致的。然而，目前的研究和社会政治辩论都表明，这种国家领土归属概念已经达到了极限：跨国和超国家实体以及非领土组织的财产取代了领土归属概念或改变了它们。因此，民族国家范式不再具有广泛的有效性。这就引出了一个问题：民族国家之后会发生什么？与此同时，人们对民族国家之前的时代也越来越感兴趣，即前现代时期民族国家的形成及其替代品和变体。这就是拟议的项目适合的地方。受当前解体过程的启发和启发，它关注范式的形成，或者更准确地说，关注近代早期归属与领土化之间的联系。以1485年至1806年期间的莱比锡为例，目标是绘制出多种联系的物品的相互联系和共存，它们的各种空间范围和它们的历史性。在第一步中，它将被问及在早期现代莱比锡，哪些空间是由不同的关键利益相关者（主权、城市、教会和学术）创建和定义的。第二步涉及要求在规范确定和这些规范在城镇居民日常生活中的锚定之间的传送带。在地图、城市景观和其他象征性表征以及市议会和仪式记录的基础上，将研究如何以及哪些不同的空间被可视化，以及哪些实践和仪式被用于制作心理地图，这是为了在城市居民的脑海中锚定当局的空间安排。在第三步中，重点转向在这些城市空间中移动和互动的人。审问记录和请求提供了充足的信息，说明他们如何解释自己的空间，以及当局的规范在多大程度上与这一过程有关。由于这些空间财产的配置在近代早期的过程中发生了变化，该项目反复解决了这个问题，以便从历史的角度阐明领土化、国家建设和归属之间的高度相关联系。与此同时，该项目从下面引入了领土化的方面，这是迄今为止很少被考虑到的，以经典的国家建筑叙事。