Schadensersatz wegen der Verletzung einer internationalen Gerichtsstandsvereinbarung?

因违反国际管辖协议而造成的损害赔偿？

• 批准号: 354841670
• 负责人: Dr. Jennifer Antomo
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: Lehrstuhl für BR, Internationales Privatrecht und Rechtsvergleichung
• 依托单位国家: 德国
• 项目类别: Publication Grants
• 财政年份: 2017
• 资助国家: 德国
• 起止时间: 2016-12-31 至 2018-12-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/354841670?language=en
• 关键词: Schadensersatz; wegen; der; Verletzung; einer

Parties to international commercial contracts often agree on the exclusive jurisdiction of a certain state's courts. However, such international choice of court agreements are not always respected by the parties and neither are they binding in some jurisdictions. Remedies, such as anti-suit injunctions, do not always protect the party relying on the agreement from the consequences of being sued in a derogated forum. The dissertation examines if it would be possible to claim damages for the breach of an international choice of court agreement. lt also analyses relevant foreign case law, and discusses the topic's dogmatic and political aspects from the German courts' perspective. The work then goes on to explore the differences arising from the application of the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements and the revised Brussels I Regulation.

国际商事合同的当事人通常就某一国家法院的专属管辖权达成一致。然而，这种国际选择法院协议并不总是得到当事各方的尊重，在一些法域中也不具有约束力。反诉讼禁令等补救措施并不总是保护依赖协议的一方免受在减损的法庭上被起诉的后果。本文探讨了是否有可能对违反国际选择法院协议的行为提出损害赔偿要求。分析了国外相关判例法，并从德国法院的角度探讨了该论题的教条性和政治性。然后，这项工作继续探讨《海牙选择法院协定公约》和经修订的《布鲁塞尔一号条例》的适用所产生的差异。