Schadensersatz wegen der Verletzung einer internationalen Gerichtsstandsvereinbarung?

因违反国际管辖协议而造成的损害赔偿？

• 批准号: 354841670
• 负责人: Dr. Jennifer Antomo
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: Lehrstuhl für BR, Internationales Privatrecht und Rechtsvergleichung
• 依托单位国家: 德国
• 项目类别: Publication Grants
• 财政年份: 2017
• 资助国家: 德国
• 起止时间: 2016-12-31 至 2018-12-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/354841670?language=en
• 关键词: Schadensersatz; wegen; der; Verletzung; einer

Parties to international commercial contracts often agree on the exclusive jurisdiction of a certain state's courts. However, such international choice of court agreements are not always respected by the parties and neither are they binding in some jurisdictions. Remedies, such as anti-suit injunctions, do not always protect the party relying on the agreement from the consequences of being sued in a derogated forum. The dissertation examines if it would be possible to claim damages for the breach of an international choice of court agreement. lt also analyses relevant foreign case law, and discusses the topic's dogmatic and political aspects from the German courts' perspective. The work then goes on to explore the differences arising from the application of the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements and the revised Brussels I Regulation.

国际商业合同的当事方通常就某个州法院的专属管辖权达成共识。但是，当事方并不总是尊重这种国际法院协议的选择，在某些司法管辖区也没有约束力。诸如反诉讼禁令之类的补救措施并不总是保护当事方，依靠该协议免受被贬低的论坛中被起诉的后果。论文探讨了是否有可能要求违反国际法院协议的损害赔偿。 LT还分析了相关的外国判例法，并从德国法院的角度讨论了该主题的教条和政治方面。然后，这项工作继续探讨了《海牙公约》在选择法院协议和我监管的布鲁塞尔的适用中产生的差异。