Pastoral care in the shadows of the High-Court. Edition and analysis of the handwritten records from a Lutheran diacon around 1600.

关心死刑犯的灵魂是德意志早期忏悔辩论中最突出的争论领域之一。它的批判性评价，特别是评价所有教派的神职人员对其牧灵工作的态度，迄今为止，除了一些案例研究外，还没有成为历史研究的中心。在纽伦堡的日耳曼国家博物馆的档案中，有约翰内斯·哈根多恩的手写记录。约翰内斯·哈根多恩是路德教的执事，在1605年至1620年期间，他负责照顾那些被判处死刑的人。因此，在过去的几十年里，有相当多的人试图编辑哈根多恩的文本，这并不奇怪。这个设想项目的目的是实现这个版本，使约翰内斯·哈根多恩的记录能够被更广泛的科学观众所访问。此外，该项目将从比较的角度来看待哈根多恩的文本。为此，我们将与Hagendorn的记录一起分析耶稣会牧灵关怀最重要的文件之一——Pedro de Leon的记录。Pedro de Leon是一位耶稣会牧师，在1578年至1616年期间在锡维拉照顾了300名被判处死刑的人。尽管佩德罗·德·莱昂的日记早在1981年就被编辑过，但迄今为止，刑法史领域的研究人员一直忽视它。这两种传统在很多方面都是相似的，但同时也指出了对权威的认知和解释以及被判刑者和作者自己作为牧师和监护人的角色的明显的忏悔差异。哈根多恩期刊对前现代史的许多研究领域都具有高度的相关性。该项目将侧重于在犯罪史和刑法背景下对文本进行评价和分析。他的著作证明了新教教会对死刑的无条件认可，以及他们只关心那些受到酷刑惩罚威胁的人。作为牧师，他比任何人都更接近被鄙视的人。除了有关刑罚制度的细节外，哈根多恩的文本还提供了对囚犯的教育水平、监狱条件、精神状态以及行为和精神需求的见解。他描述了牧师在刑罚系统中的角色，他们经常超越自己的实际职责。此外，他对酷刑审讯期间的交流过程提供了深刻的见解，他本人以及司法人员和囚犯亲属都参与了这一过程。通过这种方式，约翰内斯·哈根多恩的日记比当时任何其他文献都更能让我们接近被判死刑的人所遭受的折磨和痛苦。

Caring for the souls of those sentenced to death was one of the most prominent fields of contestation in the early confessional debates in the Reich. Its critical evaluation, especially the evaluation of the attitude of the clergy of all confessions towards their pastoral work, has not been at the centre of historical research so far, apart from a few case studies.In the archives of the Germanic National museum in Nuremberg lie the handwritten records of Johannes Hagendorn, a Lutheran deacon who was responsible for the pastoral care of those sentenced to death from 1605-1620. Therefore, it is not surprising that there were quite a few attempts at editing the text of Hagendorn over the last decades. It is the aim of the envisioned project to realize the edition and make the records of Johannes Hagendorn accessible to a broader scientific audience. Furthermore, the project will look at Hagendorns text in a comparative perspective. For this purpose, one of the most important documents of the Jesuit pastoral care, the records of Pedro de Leon, who was a Jesuit pastor cared for 300 men sentenced to death in Sivilla between 1578 and 1616, will be analysed alongside the records of Hagendorn. Although Pedro de Leons diary has already been edited in 1981, it has so far been ignored by researchers working in the field of the history of criminal law. Both traditions are similar in multiple ways, but at the same time point to evidently confessional differences in the perception and interpretation of the authority as well as the sentenced men and the authors own role as pastors and caretakers. Hagendorns journal is highly relevant for numerous research areas in premodern history. The project will focus on the evaluation and analysis of the text in the context of the history of criminality [delinquency] and criminal law. His writings prove the unconditional approval of the death penalty by the protestant church as well as the fact that they only cared for those threatened with torturesome punishment. As a pastor, he was closer to the contemned than anybody else. Alongside details about the penal system, Hagendorns text offers insight into the level of education, the prison conditions, the mental state as well as the behavior and the spiritual needs of the prisoners. He describes the role of the pastor within the penal system that often surmounted their actual duties. Furthermore, he offers insight into the communicative processes during torturesome interrogations, in which he himself, as a well as the judicial persons and relatives of the prisoners took part. In this way, the journal of Johannes Hagendorn brings us close to the torture and pain of the condemned men than any other document of the time.