权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Economy and Social Freedom

经济与社会自由

基本信息

批准号：
375138170
负责人：
Dr. Hannes Kuch
金额：
--
依托单位：
依托单位国家：
德国
项目类别：
Research Grants
财政年份：
2017
资助国家：
德国
起止时间：
2016-12-31 至 2020-12-31
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/375138170?language=en
关键词：
Economy Social Freedom

项目摘要

In liberal political philosophy, the status of the market remained uncontroversial for a long time, or it was even idealized in a one-sided way, usually under the assumption that markets as such are primarily efficiency-enhancing institutions. In the last couple of years, however, markets proved to be crisis-prone, amplifiers of inequality and institutions with an internal dynamics of their own, permeating non-economic spheres of life in a problematic way. This is why markets today come increasingly under critical philosophical scrutiny. At the same time, the recent world economic crisis not only shook the faith in the efficiency of free markets, it also contributed to the philosophical and public revival of the notion of socialism. Against this backdrop, my research project examines the normative foundations and the institutional framework of what in the tradition of John Stuart Mill and John Rawls is called liberal socialism: an economic form overcoming the capitalist dimensions of the market while ensuring political freedoms and democratic rights. The research project builds on the Hegelian notion of social freedom for outlining a normative justification and the institutional requirements of a liberal socialism. According to the notion of social freedom, others should not primarily be understood as barriers to individual freedom, but as a condition and even enlargement of it. This notion allows for the insight that it neither suffices to redistribute economic output in solidarity, nor to equalize the initial economic conditions. What matters above all is, instead, the adequate realization of solidarity within economic practices themselves. The liberal socialism put forward here still grants an important role to the market. But it argues for transforming the market constitutively, so that its ethical deficits can be reduced significantly, for example as regards the exploitation of power imbalances or the externalization of social costs. In this perspective, market socialism not only aims at taming the market by regulatory or welfare policies, but at transforming it constitutively: It is about socializing the market from within, by changing its constitutive rules and by strengthening its internal regulative mechanisms.The research project is not only of contemporary socio-political significance, it also brings political and social philosophy into a closer dialogue. By combining the philosophy of the market with institutional proposals from economics and the social sciences, it also operates with a decisively interdisciplinary approach.

在自由主义政治哲学中，市场的地位在很长一段时间内都没有争议，或者甚至被片面地理想化，通常是在市场本身主要是提高效率的机构的假设下。然而，在过去的几年里，市场被证明是容易发生危机的，是不平等的放大器，是具有自身内在动力的机构，以一种有问题的方式渗透到生活的非经济领域。这就是为什么今天的市场越来越多地受到批判性哲学的审视。与此同时，最近的世界经济危机不仅动摇了人们对自由市场效率的信念，也促使社会主义概念在哲学和公共领域的复兴。在此背景下，我的研究项目探讨了规范基础和制度框架，在约翰·斯图尔特·穆勒和约翰·罗尔斯的传统中被称为自由社会主义：一种克服市场资本主义维度的经济形式，同时确保政治自由和民主权利。该研究项目建立在黑格尔的社会自由概念的基础上，概述了自由社会主义的规范性理由和制度要求。根据社会自由的概念，他人不应首先被理解为个人自由的障碍，而应被理解为个人自由的条件，甚至是个人自由的扩大。相反，最重要的是在经济实践本身中充分实现团结。这里提出的自由社会主义仍然赠款市场重要的作用。但它主张从本质上改造市场，从而大大减少市场的道德缺陷，例如利用权力不平衡或社会成本外部化。从这个角度来看，市场社会主义的目标不仅是通过管制或福利政策来驯服市场，而且是从根本上改造市场：通过改变市场的构成规则和加强其内部调节机制，从内部使市场社会化。本研究项目不仅具有当代社会政治意义，而且还使政治和社会哲学更密切地对话。通过将市场哲学与经济学和社会科学的制度建议相结合，它还以决定性的跨学科方法运作。