Quoting as a narrative strategy.A digital hermeneutic analysis of intertextual phenomena using the example of the letters of Church Father Jerome.

这个（正在进行的）项目的目标是开发和建立一个有区别的分类系统，用于分析引文和典故，更仔细地检查引文作为一种话语叙事策略，并使人们能够更深入地了解基督教古代晚期的文化杂交过程。除了全面介绍教父杰罗姆的互文策略外，该项目还旨在对（晚期）古代的引用技巧进行概括性的系统陈述。该项目基于两个同等重要的支柱：一个主要基于计算机的分析路径，以及一个历史文化解释路径。具体而言，作为第一个目标，基于计算机的互文现象检测的混合方法的方法应扩展到一个普遍适用的文本参考的数字解释学分析模型。第二个目标是通过对杰罗姆使用古代和圣经前文本的全面结构和语义分析，全面了解他的参考技术。为了能够将计算机辅助结果与维吉尔的《埃涅阿斯纪》互文使用的富有成效的试点项目的结果进行比较，并解释它们，此外，还对维吉尔的《牧歌》和《乔治卡》、西塞罗的全部作品以及作者和作品进行了文本比较，但在杰罗姆的书信体中还没有发现引用。为此，数字滤波器规格必须通过附加的语义参数来改进。为了更深入地理解杰罗姆的互文策略，本文将分析扩展到奥古斯丁和安布罗斯的书信体。关于它的文化科学的内在价值，杰罗姆的引用技术的叙事学研究，以及继续，首先，通过系统地检查杰罗姆的报价从圣经和经典的综合分类网格的手段。第二，语义参照分析有助于更深入地理解信件的内容，并有助于对杰罗姆早期通信网络中的友谊信件进行创新性的（个性化的）解释。为了对早期书信中引用的技巧进行分类和评价，分析的语料库将扩大，包括杰罗姆后期的书信和不同主题的书信，以及杰罗姆作品中其他类型的文本（例如圣经祈祷文）。新的语料库将接受一个类似的系统性检验，因为大量的发现是可以预期的，系统的研究将有助于找到互文现象的适当的呈现形式，确保一个友好的方式来传达结果，超越传统的广泛的附录。

The objective of the (ongoing) project is to develop and establish a differentiated classification system for the analysis of quotations and allusions, which more closely examines quoting as a discursive-narrative strategy und enables a deeper understanding of cultural hybridization processes of Christian late antiquity. Beyond a comprehensive account of Church Father Jerome’s intertextual strategy, the project aims to formulate generalizing methodical statements about quoting techniques in (late) antiquity.The project rests on two pillars of equal importance: a primarily computer-based as well as a historico-cultural hermeneutic path of analysis. Specifically, as a first goal, the mixed-methods approach of computer-based detection of intertextual phenomena shall be expanded into a universally applicable digital hermeneutic analysis model for text references. The second goal is to develop a holistic picture of Jerome’s referencing technique based on a comprehensive structurally- as well as semantically-oriented analysis of his usage of antique and biblical pre-texts.In order to be able to compare the computer-aided results to the findings of the highly fruitful pilot project on the intertextual usage of Virgil’s Aeneid and interpret them, additional text comparisons are drawn to Virgil’s Eclogues and Georgica, Cicero’s oeuvre as well as authors and works, from which no quotations have been found in Jerome’s epistolary corpus yet. For this, the digital filter specifications must be improved through additional semantic parameters. For an even further-reaching historical contextualization of Jerome’s intertextual strategy, the analyses are extended to Augustine’s and Ambrose’s epistolary corpora. With regard to its intrinsic value for the cultural sciences, the narratological investigation of Jerome’s quoting technique is continued as well, first, by systematically examining Jerome’s quotations from the Bible and the classics by means of a comprehensive classification grid. Second, the semantic reference analysis is supposed to contribute to a deeper understanding of the contents of the letters and to innovative (individual) interpretations of the letters of friendship in Jerome’s early communication network. For a subsequent classification and evaluation of the quoting techniques employed in the early letters, the analyzed corpus will be expanded and include letters from Jerome’s later period and letters with different main topics, as well as other types of texts (e.g. Biblical praefationes) of Jerome’s oeuvre. The new corpus is then subjected to an analog systematic examination.Because a large number of findings is to be expected, methodical research shall help to find adequate forms of presentation of intertextual phenomena ensuring a recipient-friendly way to communicate the results which transcend traditional extensive appendices.