Transnational paradigms in Eastern Europe research in Germany and Poland during the interwar period.

德国和波兰东欧研究的强度和动态有许多共同的先决条件和基础，使它们具有可比性。由于国家存在的历史维度，这两个国家都对东方有着浓厚的兴趣，这是强烈的政治化和东欧研究在两国历史研究中的暴露地位的结果。毕竟是（苏联）俄罗斯，在德国和波兰的东欧研究中占据着关键地位。它的地缘政治评估对两国都具有很高的重要性，甚至在一定程度上具有生存重要性，也决定了作为传统大国政策空间的中东欧的立场。相关研究发表了关于德国和波兰东欧研究的重要论文。此外，他也很好地研究了德国东方研究和波兰西方研究是如何相互关联的。另一方面，两种东欧研究之间的结构类比和沟通桥梁没有被探讨。这导致了一个创新的研究领域，该领域采用跨国的方法，探索了通过嵌入研究而导致范式相似性的感知、交流模式和相互联系。考虑到研究情况和东欧研究框架内的权重，该项目集中于四个主要重点，这些重点主要涉及对东欧历史中直接和重要现象的研究观点，它们在意见形成和概念化方面发展了一种势在必行的方法，因为它们决定了在现代科学领域的参与和主导地位，从而获得了重要的政治相关性。东方作为一个潜在的文化和政治文明空间的领域和扩张。俄国革命和承认社会革命是一个历史范畴。布尔什维克主义与暴政类型学的创造。普罗米修斯主义作为一种对东方行动负有特殊责任的历史条件主义，关注东欧研究的直接政治剥削和有效性。该项目的目的是提供以下问题的答案：在两次世界大战之间的两个已建立的东欧研究中心，如何在存在高度政治障碍的情况下建立跨国思维模式、概念和评估标准，这些模式、概念和评估标准对各国东欧研究的结构、问题、结果和国际定位产生持久影响。

Intensity and dynamics of Eastern Europe research in Germany and Poland have a number of common prerequisites and fundamentals that make them comparable. In both countries there is a strong interest in the East due to the historical dimension of state existence, which is the result of the strong politicization and the exposed position of Eastern Europe research within historical research in both countries. After all, it is (Soviet) Russia, which occupies a key position in Eastern Europe research in Germany and Poland. Its geopolitical assessment is of both high and, to a certain extent, even existential importance for both countries and also decides on the position towards and in Central Eastern Europe as a traditional power policy space.Relevant research has presented important papers on German and Polish Eastern Europe research. Also, is well studied how German Eastern research and Polish Western research were related to each other. On the other hand, the structural analogies and communicative bridges between the two Eastern European studies are not explored. This results in an innovative field of research which, with the methodical approach of the transnational, explores the perceptions, communication patterns, and also interconnections that have led to paradigmatic similarities through their embedding in research.Taking into account the research situation and the weighting within the framework of Eastern European research, the project concentrates on four main focuses, which are mainly related to research perspectives towards immediate and important phenomena within Eastern European history, and which have developed an imperative approach in terms of opinion formation and conceptualization insofar as they decided over participation and dominance in the modern science landscape and thus gained a significant political relevance.1. East as a potential cultural- and political-civilizing space for domain and expansion.2. Revolution in Russia and the recognition of the social revolution as a historical category.3. Bolshevism and the creation of typology of tyranny.4. Prometheism as a doctrine of the historical conditionality of a particular responsibility to action in the East, focussing on the direct political exploitation and effectiveness of Eastern Europe research.The aim of the project is to provide answers to the question how, in the two established centers of Eastern Europe research during the interwar period, transnational thought models, conceptualities and assessment criteria are established despite the existing high political obstacles, which have a lasting influence on the structure, problems, results and international positioning of national Eastern Europe research.