The Lord of Time. A Model of Eternity Utilizing Ideas from Schelling’s Late Philosophy and from Physical Models.

《时代先生》（Der Herr der Zeit）Ein Ewigkeitsmodell im Anschluss an Schellings Spätphilosophie und physikalische Modle "以这样的论点开始：所有可能的与时间的关系对于上帝来说都是可用的，上帝可以在这些关系之间自由选择。上帝可以让所有的时刻同时存在于一个时刻。但他也可以改变他与时间的关系，例如，通过采取及时的存在。本论文是从引言中上帝的无限性出发的：如果任何与时间的关系都超出了上帝的限制，上帝就不是真正的无限的，证明本论文的逻辑一致性是本文的目的。这是通过开发一个模型来实现的，该模型可以描述不同时间关系之间的转换。为了找到对这个模型有用的思想和概念，我们研究了物理理论中使用的时间概念。重点放在理论，特别是挑战经典的时间概念，如相对论。作为思想的第二个来源，谢林晚期哲学中的时间概念和永恒概念被讨论。谢林的哲学是迄今为止有趣的，因为他已经制定了一个过渡，物理学和谢林的哲学中都有一种方法，似乎特别适合于描述与时间的不同关系之间的过渡：如果时间不是动力学的先决条件，而是动力学的结果，则在所有时间的及时性和在场之间的转换是可能的。根据这种方法，可以从动力学中抽象出动力学的规则结构和模式。根据动态，这种形式可以是及时性，全部或多次出现，或多次出现。如果动力不受外在因素的限制，这些形式之间的转换也是可能的。因此，本作品中提出的永恒模型可以概括为：上帝是动态的。他的行为不受外在因素或结构的限制。因此，他的行为的形式，在他的行为中演变的模式和结构，是那些最适合于预期行为的形式，并且可以因行为而异。

The dissertation „Der Herr der Zeit. Ein Ewigkeitsmodell im Anschluss an Schellings Spätphilosophie und physikalische Modelle“ begins with the thesis that all possible relations to time are available for God, who can choose freely between these relations. God can have all moments of time simultaneously present in one moment. But He can also change his relation to time, e.g. by taking on a timely existence. This thesis is derived from God’s infinity in the introduction: If any relation to time would be out of God’s limits, God would not be truly infinite.Proving the logical consistency of this thesis is the aim of the dissertation. This is achieved by developing a model, that can describe transitions between different relations to time. To find ideas and concepts useful for this model, the concepts of time used in physical theories are examined. The focus is laid on theories that especially challenge classical concepts of time, like the relativity theories. As a second source of ideas the concepts of time and eternity in Schelling’s late philosophy are discussed. Schelling’s philosophy is in so far interesting for this dissertation as he already formulated a transition from (timeless) eternity to time.One approach found in both, physics and Schelling’s philosophy, seems to be especially suited to describe transitions between different relations to time: If time is not a prerequisite of dynamics, but emerges as a consequence of dynamics, then transitions between timeliness and presence of all times are possible. According to this approach regular structures and patterns of the dynamics can be abstracted from the dynamics as a form. Depending on the dynamics this form can be timeliness, presence of all or many times, or a net of many times. If the dynamics are not restricted by external factors transitions between these forms are possible, too.Thus the model of eternity proposed in this work can be summarized as following: God acts dynamically. In his acts he is not restricted by external factors or structures. Thus the forms of his acts, the patterns and structures evolving in his acts, are those that are most suitable for the intended acts and can differ from act to act.