How do health professionals translate available evidence on early childhood allergy prevention into health-literacy responsive practice? (Health Professionals)

卫生专业人员如何将儿童早期过敏预防的现有证据转化为健康素养响应实践？

• 批准号: 427399268
• 负责人: Dr. Susanne Brandstetter, since 10/2021
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: Lehrstuhl für Medizinische Soziologie
• 依托单位国家: 德国
• 项目类别: Research Units
• 财政年份: 2019
• 资助国家: 德国
• 起止时间: 2018-12-31 至 2021-12-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/427399268?language=en
• 关键词: How; do; health; professionals; translate

Pediatricians, general practitioners (GPs) and midwives are in regular contact with expectant and new parents. Research has shown that preventive counseling by health professionals can be effective in improving patients’ health literacy (HL) and health behavior. Providing effective advice on early childhood allergy prevention (ECAP) relies on two aspects: First, health professionals need to keep informed on the dynamically changing research evidence on ECAP, as well as consider popular misconceptions and fears, and to translate this knowledge into clear recommendations to advise their patients’ families (knowledge translation). Second, they need to know and employ counseling techniques that respond to parental HL needs and create a HL-supportive practice setting (health literacy-responsive care). Due to a lack of research in this area, it is paramount to better understand how evidence is translated by health professionals into practical knowledge, to understand their views and practices with regard to ECAP and HL, and to explore barriers and facilitators which they may encounter in their daily practice. The objective of WP3 is to explore a) how German health professionals in ambulatory care take up, make sense of and transfer research evidence on ECAP to their patients’ families and b) how they consider HL challenges in their ECAP counselling and organization of their practice setting. A qualitative exploratory research design was chosen, complemented by developing and piloting a standardized questionnaire in the third project year. Tasks (1) and (2): In order to explore the health professionals’ views on ECAP knowledge translation and HL-responsive care, semi-standardized qualitative interviews will be conducted with pediatricians/GPs (1) and midwives (2). Task (3): In order to contrast and enrich data from (1) and (2), qualitative expert interviews will be conducted with health professionals who hold a functional position within an organization specialized in allergy/HL, and who can provide a superordinate perspective. Task (4): Based on the results from (1) to (3), a standardized questionnaire and study design will be developed for assessing perceived barriers, enablers and challenges of health professionals in ECAP and HL-responsive care. A pilot study will be conducted for evaluating the usability of the questionnaire in a large-scale survey. WP3 focuses on the healthcare environment shaping parental HL in ECAP. It is linked to “WP2-Living Systematic Review”, which provides the up-to-date research evidence on ECAP, and to “WP1-Conflict of Interest”, with regard to the relevance of COI in guideline generation for health professionals’ care practice. “WP4-User Needs” addresses the parental views on HL in ECAP, therefore, mutual consultation is planned when developing the interview guides and for triangulating the results.

儿科医生、全科医生和助产士经常与准父母和新父母接触。研究表明，卫生专业人员的预防性咨询可以有效提高患者的健康素养（HL）和健康行为。提供有效的儿童早期过敏预防（ECAP）建议依赖于两个方面：首先，卫生专业人员需要了解动态变化的ECAP研究证据，同时考虑流行的误解和恐惧，并将这些知识转化为明确的建议，以建议患者家属（知识转化）。其次，他们需要了解和使用咨询技术，以回应父母的HL需求，并创造一个HL支持的实践环境（健康素养响应式护理）。由于这一领域缺乏研究，因此至关重要的是要更好地了解卫生专业人员如何将证据转化为实践知识，了解他们对ECAP和HL的看法和做法，并探索他们在日常实践中可能遇到的障碍和促进因素。WP3的目标是探讨a)德国门诊保健专业人员如何接受、理解和向患者家属传递关于ECAP的研究证据；b)他们如何在ECAP咨询和实践环境组织中考虑HL挑战。选择了一种定性探索性研究设计，并在项目第三年制定和试行一份标准化问卷。任务(1)和(2)：为了探讨卫生专业人员对ECAP知识翻译和hl响应式护理的看法，将对儿科医生/全科医生(1)和助产士(2)进行半标准化定性访谈。任务(3)：为了对比和丰富(1)和(2)的数据，将与在过敏/HL专业组织中担任职能职位的卫生专业人员进行定性专家访谈，他们可以提供上级视角。任务(4)：基于(1)至(3)的结果，将开发一份标准化的问卷和研究设计，以评估卫生专业人员在ECAP和hl响应性护理中感知到的障碍、促进因素和挑战。将进行一项试点研究，以评价问卷在大规模调查中的可用性。WP3关注的是影响ECAP亲本HL的医疗环境。它与“wp2 -实时系统评价”和“wp1 -利益冲突”相关联，前者提供了关于ECAP的最新研究证据，后者涉及COI在卫生专业人员护理实践指南制定中的相关性。“wp4 -用户需求”解决了家长对ECAP中HL的看法，因此，在制定访谈指南和对结果进行三角测量时，计划进行相互咨询。