课题基金 / 基金详情

IRELAND : UNKNOWN KINGDOM OF CONSTITUTIONAL JUSTICE

IRELAND : UNKNOWN KINGDOM OF CONSTITUTIONAL JUSTICE
爱尔兰:未知的宪法正义王国
批准号:
05620018
负责人:
MOTOYAMA Ken
金额:
$0.64万
依托单位:
依托单位国家:
日本
项目类别:
Grant-in-Aid for General Scientific Research (C)
财政年份:
1993
资助国家:
日本
项目状态:
已结题
起止时间:
1993 至 1994

项目摘要

项目成果

MOTOYAMA Ken的其他基金

相似基金

相关文献

中文摘要
翻译
爱尔兰的宪法司法在日本并不那么有名。但它在爱尔兰政治或社会生活中的影响今天决不能忽视。它的制度本身是在1937年爱尔兰宪法规定。在颁布时,德瓦莱拉从未想过它的积极作用,而只是把它放在宪法文本上。在20世纪50年代之前,宪法案件也很少。但自20世纪60年代以来,此类案件呈爆炸性增长。到那时,爱尔兰社会的现代化已经开始,人们开始意识到他们的人权或公民权利。欧盟的加入加速了这一进程。本研究的目的是介绍日本的宪法司法制度及其运作,并衡量其对爱尔兰宪法司法或政治发展的意义。此外,通过本研究,我们还获得了其他一些收获。这主要表现在:(1)英国法的影响逐渐向后,美国法的影响逐渐向前,然后是欧共体法的影响。(B)当代英国关于成文宪法或选举改革的争论,最近开始把爱尔兰宪政制度作为其前身来看待,笔者在论文中或多或少地写过上述问题。但由于时间的限制,笔者未能对爱尔兰宪法的历史发展进行分析和描述。
英文摘要
Irish constitutional justice has not been so famous in Japan. But its influence in Irish political or social life must not be negligible today. Its system itself is provided in the 1937 Irish Constitution. At the time of the enactment De Valera had never thought of its active functon, but just put it on the text of the Constitution. There were very few constitutional cases until 1950s in effect, too. But since 1960s those cases have been increased explosively. By that time the modernization of Irish society has been begun, and the people began to be conscious of their human rights or citizen rights. The membership to the EC (now Eu) has accelerated this process.The purpose of this study is to introduce the constitutional justice system and its working to Japan, and to measure its significance for the development of the constitutional justice or politics in Ireland.In addition, through this study we also have been able to acquire several other attainments. Those are the followings--(a)the influence of English law goes gradually backward, and instead, the influences of the American law, and then the EC law go forward.(b)Contemporary debates of a written constitution or the electoral reform in Britain recently began to look at the system and function of Irish Constitutional system as their predecessor.This writer has more or less written about the above matters in the essays. But this writer failed to analise and describe the historical development of the Irish Constitution mainly because of the lack of time.this must be done near future.
期刊论文(22)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
元山 健: "アイルランドにおける憲法裁判の展開-序論的考察-" 東邦大学教養紀要. 25. 39-52 (1993)
Ken Motoyama:“爱尔兰宪法法院的发展 - 介绍性考虑”东邦大学文科公告 25. 39-52 (1993)。
DOI: --
发表时间:
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者: []
通讯作者:
元山健: "アイルランドにおける憲法裁判の展開-序論的考察-" 東邦大学教養紀要. 25. 39-52 (1993)
Ken Motoyama:“爱尔兰宪法法院的发展 - 介绍性考虑”东邦大学文科公告 25. 39-52 (1993)。
DOI: --
发表时间:
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者: []
通讯作者:
元山健: "アイルランド選挙制度考-単記移譲式の経験を総括する-" 早稲田法学. 69. 23-50 (1994)
Ken Motoyama:“对爱尔兰选举制度的思考——单注移交仪式的经验总结——”《早稻田法律研究》69. 23-50 (1994)。
DOI: --
发表时间:
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者: []
通讯作者:
元山健: "成文憲法制定論議とその射程" 比較法研究. 56. 131-135 (1994)
Ken Motoyama:“关于成文宪法的建立及其范围的辩论”《比较法研究》56。131-135(1994)。
DOI: --
发表时间:
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者: []
通讯作者:
共 11 条
    Historical Range of the 1937 Irish Constitutions enacted between two Wars
    Unstable Prospects of Modern Unwritten Constitution Under the Thatcher Governments
    • 批准号:
      02620013
    • 项目类别:
      Grant-in-Aid for General Scientific Research (C)
    • 资助金额:
      $0.64万
    • 财政年份:
      1990
    • 负责人:
      MOTOYAMA Ken
    • 依托单位:
    海外基金